Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone that believes the "GOP was celebrating shutting down the government" is a dumbass.
Even if they did "shut it down", which they didn't, NO WAY any of them celebrates it as it KILLED THEM with the bogus press no matter how anyone spins it.
Only a fool believes the Republicans wanted to see what the Democrats in the Senate did.
Paul Broun is brilliant.
Master Bull Shitter and the DUMB MASSES right wing KOOKS here eat it up.
But he has MASSIVE opposition here.
What Broun says is all crap, would not vote him for anything.
BTW, the Democrats in the Senate shut down the government, not the Republicans.
So the Dem Senate rejects the GOP's demand that the individual mandate be delayed for one year (they should have demanded that the mandate be delayed until hell froze over), which the House GOP knew would be rejected. So if the GOP would have demanded that all Dems kill themselves and the Dems in the Senate rejected that proposal, the Dems would be blamed for the shutdown?
Why was the GOP celebrating shutting down the government, until the every opinion poll showed a huge drop in the GOP favorability? I mean the right had a huge circle jerk on these very pages celebrating the shutdown. After the poll results started showing up, they blamed the Dems!
I just love it when folks rewrite history! Party on down!
You just admitted the Democrats shut down the government.
But there really was NO shutdown of government.
"non essential services" and some Blue Flu and that was it.
The Senate is majority Democrat and they refused to pass the bill that was sent over from the House.
The House is duly elected and has every right to send over a majority bill.
And the Senate had every right not to pass a bill that WOULD HAVE FUNDED the government.
But the Democratic held Senate did not and thus funding stopped flowing.
But your partisan spin was funny!
Correction.You just admitted the Democrats shut down the government.
But there really was NO shutdown of government.
"non essential services" and some Blue Flu and that was it.
The Senate is majority Democrat and they refused to pass the bill that was sent over from the House.
The House is duly elected and has every right to send over a majority bill.
And the Senate had every right not to pass a bill that WOULD HAVE FUNDED the government.
But the Democratic held Senate did not and thus funding stopped flowing.
But your partisan spin was funny!
So the Dem Senate rejects the GOP's demand that the individual mandate be delayed for one year (they should have demanded that the mandate be delayed until hell froze over), which the House GOP knew would be rejected. So if the GOP would have demanded that all Dems kill themselves and the Dems in the Senate rejected that proposal, the Dems would be blamed for the shutdown?
Why was the GOP celebrating shutting down the government, until the every opinion poll showed a huge drop in the GOP favorability? I mean the right had a huge circle jerk on these very pages celebrating the shutdown. After the poll results started showing up, they blamed the Dems!
I just love it when folks rewrite history! Party on down!
You just admitted the Democrats shut down the government.
But there really was NO shutdown of government.
"non essential services" and some Blue Flu and that was it.
The Senate is majority Democrat and they refused to pass the bill that was sent over from the House.
The House is duly elected and has every right to send over a majority bill.
And the Senate had every right not to pass a bill that WOULD HAVE FUNDED the government.
But the Democratic held Senate did not and thus funding stopped flowing.
But your partisan spin was funny!
No, I pointed out how ludicrous your statement was. The GOP knew the Dems would say NO. That would be like you asking Kate Upton to marry you. The answer would be no, so why in the hell would you ask Upton to marry you? It certainly would defy logic.
My statement about the mandate clearly demonstrates I am and have always been against the mandate. So I agreed with the right to end Obamacare. On the other hand, my post clearly demonstrates that in my opinion the that the right is rewriting history, their immediate reaction to the shutdown was to take credit for it, but as mentioned, when the poll results came out, that clearly reversed themselves . It was as clear as black and white.
What makes him a "brilliant man"?
well the fact that he is a neurosurgeon; and the fact he isn't cowed by rabid lib race politics; and unafraid to leave the liberal PLANTATION
That doesn't make him brilliant. It means that he excels in a field.
Rep. Paul Broun from Georgia is also a physician. He made the dumbass statement that evolution and the big bang theory are "lies straight from the pit of Hell."
Rafael 'Ted' Cruz is another one that's assumed to be smart just because he was an excellent law student. But he has been out-witted and out-smarted at every turn since joining the Senate. He shut down the government while having NO PLAN to stop Obamacare.
Correction.You just admitted the Democrats shut down the government.
But there really was NO shutdown of government.
"non essential services" and some Blue Flu and that was it.
The Senate is majority Democrat and they refused to pass the bill that was sent over from the House.
The House is duly elected and has every right to send over a majority bill.
And the Senate had every right not to pass a bill that WOULD HAVE FUNDED the government.
But the Democratic held Senate did not and thus funding stopped flowing.
But your partisan spin was funny!
The majority democrat Senate has refused to pass nearly all bills that have been sent to over from the House, since 2010.
Then they have the nerve to claim that the GOP are a bunch of do-nothings.
Correction.You just admitted the Democrats shut down the government.
But there really was NO shutdown of government.
"non essential services" and some Blue Flu and that was it.
The Senate is majority Democrat and they refused to pass the bill that was sent over from the House.
The House is duly elected and has every right to send over a majority bill.
And the Senate had every right not to pass a bill that WOULD HAVE FUNDED the government.
But the Democratic held Senate did not and thus funding stopped flowing.
But your partisan spin was funny!
The majority democrat Senate has refused to pass nearly all bills that have been sent to over from the House, since 2010.
Then they have the nerve to claim that the GOP are a bunch of do-nothings.
Correction.You just admitted the Democrats shut down the government.
But there really was NO shutdown of government.
"non essential services" and some Blue Flu and that was it.
The Senate is majority Democrat and they refused to pass the bill that was sent over from the House.
The House is duly elected and has every right to send over a majority bill.
And the Senate had every right not to pass a bill that WOULD HAVE FUNDED the government.
But the Democratic held Senate did not and thus funding stopped flowing.
But your partisan spin was funny!
The majority democrat Senate has refused to pass nearly all bills that have been sent to over from the House, since 2010.
Then they have the nerve to claim that the GOP are a bunch of do-nothings.
Why should the Senate pass Republican sponsored bills from the House?
For the past five years, Republicans in the Senate have required the Democrats to have 60 votes to bring a bill to the floor. Why would Republicans think their bills can come up for a vote with only 45 votes?
How do they get brought to the floor for a vote, when they aren't even put on the calendar?Correction.You just admitted the Democrats shut down the government.
But there really was NO shutdown of government.
"non essential services" and some Blue Flu and that was it.
The Senate is majority Democrat and they refused to pass the bill that was sent over from the House.
The House is duly elected and has every right to send over a majority bill.
And the Senate had every right not to pass a bill that WOULD HAVE FUNDED the government.
But the Democratic held Senate did not and thus funding stopped flowing.
But your partisan spin was funny!
The majority democrat Senate has refused to pass nearly all bills that have been sent to over from the House, since 2010.
Then they have the nerve to claim that the GOP are a bunch of do-nothings.
Why should the Senate pass Republican sponsored bills from the House?
For the past five years, Republicans in the Senate have required the Democrats to have 60 votes to bring a bill to the floor. Why would Republicans think their bills can come up for a vote with only 45 votes?
Correction.
The majority democrat Senate has refused to pass nearly all bills that have been sent to over from the House, since 2010.
Then they have the nerve to claim that the GOP are a bunch of do-nothings.
Why should the Senate pass Republican sponsored bills from the House?
For the past five years, Republicans in the Senate have required the Democrats to have 60 votes to bring a bill to the floor. Why would Republicans think their bills can come up for a vote with only 45 votes?
every day you come here and lie to YOURSELF.
try researching the Dem MAJORITY LEADER'S VIEW on 60 votes. he is on record saying "THAT'S THE WAY WE DO BUSINESS HERE"
Reid has refused to even put those bills on the Senate calendar for the amendment process and debate.Correction.You just admitted the Democrats shut down the government.
But there really was NO shutdown of government.
"non essential services" and some Blue Flu and that was it.
The Senate is majority Democrat and they refused to pass the bill that was sent over from the House.
The House is duly elected and has every right to send over a majority bill.
And the Senate had every right not to pass a bill that WOULD HAVE FUNDED the government.
But the Democratic held Senate did not and thus funding stopped flowing.
But your partisan spin was funny!
The majority democrat Senate has refused to pass nearly all bills that have been sent to over from the House, since 2010.
Then they have the nerve to claim that the GOP are a bunch of do-nothings.
The GOP house sent over a lot of bills they knew the Dems wouldn't pass. When the bills came back to them from the Senate, they didn't exactly make any changes to that legislation that showed they were less partisan than the Dems.
I blame both parties for the dysfunctional state of Washington DC, but then, I'm not married to any ideology.
How do they get brought to the floor for a vote, when they aren't even put on the calendar?Correction.
The majority democrat Senate has refused to pass nearly all bills that have been sent to over from the House, since 2010.
Then they have the nerve to claim that the GOP are a bunch of do-nothings.
Why should the Senate pass Republican sponsored bills from the House?
For the past five years, Republicans in the Senate have required the Democrats to have 60 votes to bring a bill to the floor. Why would Republicans think their bills can come up for a vote with only 45 votes?
We know who the obstructionists are, and it is not the Senate republicans.
Sen. Reid: 'It's Always Been The Case You Need 60 Votes'
www.republican.senate.gov/public/index.../blog?...*
United States Senate
Jul 29, 2011 - Reid Says: 'The Need To Muster 60 Votes… ... HARRY REID (D-NV): "As majority leader, I intend to run the Senate with respect for the rules ...
comical watchin left-wings say "republicans demanded 60 votes...."
repubs dont control the Senate do; and 60 votes is that Reid has demanded forever
libs are losers who lie to themselves
They don't get debated, let alone put up for a vote, unless they are put on the Senate calendar.How do they get brought to the floor for a vote, when they aren't even put on the calendar?Why should the Senate pass Republican sponsored bills from the House?
For the past five years, Republicans in the Senate have required the Democrats to have 60 votes to bring a bill to the floor. Why would Republicans think their bills can come up for a vote with only 45 votes?
We know who the obstructionists are, and it is not the Senate republicans.
Democratic bills in the Senate don't get debated either unless they have 60 votes.
Why should Republicans demand special treatment? Especially since they are the ones demanding 60 votes?
They don't get debated, let alone put up for a vote, unless they are put on the Senate calendar.How do they get brought to the floor for a vote, when they aren't even put on the calendar?
We know who the obstructionists are, and it is not the Senate republicans.
Democratic bills in the Senate don't get debated either unless they have 60 votes.
Why should Republicans demand special treatment? Especially since they are the ones demanding 60 votes?
Who is in charge of that duty, champ?
Reid has refused to even put those bills on the Senate calendar for the amendment process and debate.Correction.
The majority democrat Senate has refused to pass nearly all bills that have been sent to over from the House, since 2010.
Then they have the nerve to claim that the GOP are a bunch of do-nothings.
The GOP house sent over a lot of bills they knew the Dems wouldn't pass. When the bills came back to them from the Senate, they didn't exactly make any changes to that legislation that showed they were less partisan than the Dems.
I blame both parties for the dysfunctional state of Washington DC, but then, I'm not married to any ideology.
That is not a fact based on ideology.
Not even a good stab as stuffing me into your myopic box, sport. I express plenty of disgust for republicans.Reid has refused to even put those bills on the Senate calendar for the amendment process and debate.The GOP house sent over a lot of bills they knew the Dems wouldn't pass. When the bills came back to them from the Senate, they didn't exactly make any changes to that legislation that showed they were less partisan than the Dems.
I blame both parties for the dysfunctional state of Washington DC, but then, I'm not married to any ideology.
That is not a fact based on ideology.
I won't even post what I think of people who think it's just the other side that's fucked. I don't play that game.
Obviously, Kool Aid guzzlers like you don't. Doesn't change anything.They don't get debated, let alone put up for a vote, unless they are put on the Senate calendar.Democratic bills in the Senate don't get debated either unless they have 60 votes.
Why should Republicans demand special treatment? Especially since they are the ones demanding 60 votes?
Who is in charge of that duty, champ?
Who cares?
You mean like the debt ceiling bills, CRs and the recent budget pork festival didn't get debated?Democratic bills don't get debated either
Simple question:
Would you support Republicans allowing the Democratic bills to come up for a vote if Democrats allow the Republican bills to come up for a vote?
