Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With rookies. He would get his ass ate up by someone that actually debates the point.Shapiro is vary good at taking an argument, changing it into something different, and winning the new argument.Ben Shapiro is the man and would smother anyone in a debate. Don't believe me? Check out YouTube and 100s of examples.
Shapiro couldnt debate his way out of a wet paper bag. His whole stitch is to get people emotional. That doesnt work on people that know better.
Yet YouTube proves otherwise. I guess very few people "know better"? IMO you've lost every debate on these boards. Too emotional for you?
Yes. Every single video was posted dummy. How do you think it got there?You tube only proves someone posted a video dummy.Ben Shapiro is the man and would smother anyone in a debate. Don't believe me? Check out YouTube and 100s of examples.
Shapiro couldnt debate his way out of a wet paper bag. His whole stitch is to get people emotional. That doesnt work on people that know better.
Yet YouTube proves otherwise. I guess very few people "know better"? IMO you've lost every debate on these boards. Too emotional for you?
In your opinion? No one takes your opinion seriously. If you consider humor an emotion you could say its close..
One or two sure, but over 100? Nope. Learn stats. Dummy.
If the kid had simply said established sentience Shapiro would have lost the debate. And this was a kid? Big whoop. Shapiro should be embarrassed.STUDENT:
“I just wanted to know why exactly do you think a first-trimester fetus has moral value?” the unidentified student asked.
SHAPIRO:
“A first trimester fetus has moral value because whether you consider it a potential human life or a full-on human life, it has more value than just a cluster of cells. If left to its natural processes, it will grow into a baby.”
"So the real question is where are you gonna draw the line? Are you gonna draw the line at the heartbeat? Because it’s very hard to draw the line at the heartbeat. There are people who are adults who are alive because of a pacemaker and they need some sort of outside force generating their heartbeat.”
"Are you going to do it based on brain function? OK, well what about people who are in a coma? Should we just kill them?”
"The problem is that whenever you draw any line other than the inception of the child, you end up drawing a false line that can be applied to people who are adults. So either human life has intrinsic value or it doesn’t.”
SHAPIRO:
“We both agree that adult human life has intrinsic value — can we start from that premise?”
STUDENT:
I believe that sentience (the capacity to feel and perceive, or to reason morally) is what gives something moral value, not necessarily being a human alone”
SHAPIRO:
“OK, so when you’re asleep, can I stab you?”
STUDENT:
“I’m still considered sentient when I’m asleep,”
SHAPIRO:
“OK, if you are in a coma from which you may awake, can I stab you?”
STUDENT:
“Well, then, uhh, no - That’s still potential sentience."
SHAPIRO:
"I agree it is potential sentience. You know what else is potential sentience? Being a fetus”
The student should thank Mr. Shapiro for the FREE EDUCATION / LESSON!
Watch: Student asks Ben Shapiro why a fetus is human life — his answer leaves student speechless
Who is Cenk? Another student? Its amusing to see how a person thats been demolished in every debate I have seen him in and laughed off the thread thinks I value his respect.With rookies. He would get his ass ate up by someone that actually debates the point.Shapiro is vary good at taking an argument, changing it into something different, and winning the new argument.Ben Shapiro is the man and would smother anyone in a debate. Don't believe me? Check out YouTube and 100s of examples.
Shapiro couldnt debate his way out of a wet paper bag. His whole stitch is to get people emotional. That doesnt work on people that know better.
Yet YouTube proves otherwise. I guess very few people "know better"? IMO you've lost every debate on these boards. Too emotional for you?
He crushed Cenk and numerous others. You're too dumb to see that. Then again you have been destroyed in every debate on these boards. People consider you a joke. I at least treat you with some level of respect as fellow ex soldiers but man you've lost it.
I never said it was posted by the same person. I said it was posted. Only a dummy thinks you tube establishes credibility.Yes. Every single video was posted dummy. How do you think it got there?You tube only proves someone posted a video dummy.Shapiro couldnt debate his way out of a wet paper bag. His whole stitch is to get people emotional. That doesnt work on people that know better.
Yet YouTube proves otherwise. I guess very few people "know better"? IMO you've lost every debate on these boards. Too emotional for you?
In your opinion? No one takes your opinion seriously. If you consider humor an emotion you could say its close.
One or two sure, but over 100? Nope. Learn stats. Dummy.
Doesn't mean it was posted by the same person. Also means that proof is there for you to see it.
Who is Cenk? Another student? Its amusing to see how a person thats been demolished in every debate I have seen him in and laughed off the thread thinks I value his respect.With rookies. He would get his ass ate up by someone that actually debates the point.Shapiro is vary good at taking an argument, changing it into something different, and winning the new argument.Shapiro couldnt debate his way out of a wet paper bag. His whole stitch is to get people emotional. That doesnt work on people that know better.
Yet YouTube proves otherwise. I guess very few people "know better"? IMO you've lost every debate on these boards. Too emotional for you?
He crushed Cenk and numerous others. You're too dumb to see that. Then again you have been destroyed in every debate on these boards. People consider you a joke. I at least treat you with some level of respect as fellow ex soldiers but man you've lost it.
When you see the child reacting to its world, breathing for itself and transitioning between moods.If the kid had simply said established sentience Shapiro would have lost the debate. And this was a kid? Big whoop. Shapiro should be embarrassed.STUDENT:
“I just wanted to know why exactly do you think a first-trimester fetus has moral value?” the unidentified student asked.
SHAPIRO:
“A first trimester fetus has moral value because whether you consider it a potential human life or a full-on human life, it has more value than just a cluster of cells. If left to its natural processes, it will grow into a baby.”
"So the real question is where are you gonna draw the line? Are you gonna draw the line at the heartbeat? Because it’s very hard to draw the line at the heartbeat. There are people who are adults who are alive because of a pacemaker and they need some sort of outside force generating their heartbeat.”
"Are you going to do it based on brain function? OK, well what about people who are in a coma? Should we just kill them?”
"The problem is that whenever you draw any line other than the inception of the child, you end up drawing a false line that can be applied to people who are adults. So either human life has intrinsic value or it doesn’t.”
SHAPIRO:
“We both agree that adult human life has intrinsic value — can we start from that premise?”
STUDENT:
I believe that sentience (the capacity to feel and perceive, or to reason morally) is what gives something moral value, not necessarily being a human alone”
SHAPIRO:
“OK, so when you’re asleep, can I stab you?”
STUDENT:
“I’m still considered sentient when I’m asleep,”
SHAPIRO:
“OK, if you are in a coma from which you may awake, can I stab you?”
STUDENT:
“Well, then, uhh, no - That’s still potential sentience."
SHAPIRO:
"I agree it is potential sentience. You know what else is potential sentience? Being a fetus”
The student should thank Mr. Shapiro for the FREE EDUCATION / LESSON!
Watch: Student asks Ben Shapiro why a fetus is human life — his answer leaves student speechless
Where does this "established sentience" come from? How do you know it when you see it?
I never said it was posted by the same person. I said it was posted. Only a dummy thinks you tube establishes credibility.Yes. Every single video was posted dummy. How do you think it got there?You tube only proves someone posted a video dummy.Yet YouTube proves otherwise. I guess very few people "know better"? IMO you've lost every debate on these boards. Too emotional for you?
In your opinion? No one takes your opinion seriously. If you consider humor an emotion you could say its close.
One or two sure, but over 100? Nope. Learn stats. Dummy.
Doesn't mean it was posted by the same person. Also means that proof is there for you to see it.
When you see the child reacting to its world, breathing for itself and transitioning between moods.If the kid had simply said established sentience Shapiro would have lost the debate. And this was a kid? Big whoop. Shapiro should be embarrassed.STUDENT:
“I just wanted to know why exactly do you think a first-trimester fetus has moral value?” the unidentified student asked.
SHAPIRO:
“A first trimester fetus has moral value because whether you consider it a potential human life or a full-on human life, it has more value than just a cluster of cells. If left to its natural processes, it will grow into a baby.”
"So the real question is where are you gonna draw the line? Are you gonna draw the line at the heartbeat? Because it’s very hard to draw the line at the heartbeat. There are people who are adults who are alive because of a pacemaker and they need some sort of outside force generating their heartbeat.”
"Are you going to do it based on brain function? OK, well what about people who are in a coma? Should we just kill them?”
"The problem is that whenever you draw any line other than the inception of the child, you end up drawing a false line that can be applied to people who are adults. So either human life has intrinsic value or it doesn’t.”
SHAPIRO:
“We both agree that adult human life has intrinsic value — can we start from that premise?”
STUDENT:
I believe that sentience (the capacity to feel and perceive, or to reason morally) is what gives something moral value, not necessarily being a human alone”
SHAPIRO:
“OK, so when you’re asleep, can I stab you?”
STUDENT:
“I’m still considered sentient when I’m asleep,”
SHAPIRO:
“OK, if you are in a coma from which you may awake, can I stab you?”
STUDENT:
“Well, then, uhh, no - That’s still potential sentience."
SHAPIRO:
"I agree it is potential sentience. You know what else is potential sentience? Being a fetus”
The student should thank Mr. Shapiro for the FREE EDUCATION / LESSON!
Watch: Student asks Ben Shapiro why a fetus is human life — his answer leaves student speechless
Where does this "established sentience" come from? How do you know it when you see it?
He is no one to me. I have higher standards so I typically dont know many of the insignificant peons you admire. Dont be mad.Who is Cenk? Another student? Its amusing to see how a person thats been demolished in every debate I have seen him in and laughed off the thread thinks I value his respect.With rookies. He would get his ass ate up by someone that actually debates the point.Shapiro is vary good at taking an argument, changing it into something different, and winning the new argument.Yet YouTube proves otherwise. I guess very few people "know better"? IMO you've lost every debate on these boards. Too emotional for you?
He crushed Cenk and numerous others. You're too dumb to see that. Then again you have been destroyed in every debate on these boards. People consider you a joke. I at least treat you with some level of respect as fellow ex soldiers but man you've lost it.
You don't know who Cenk is? Oh my.
Cenk Uygur - Wikipedia
You suffer from PTSD I see as you're delusional. Please explain why you, yes you, have lost every single debate on these boards that I have observed. In fact you were embarrassed.
He is no one to me. I have higher standards so I typically dont know many of the insignificant peons you admire. Dont be mad.Who is Cenk? Another student? Its amusing to see how a person thats been demolished in every debate I have seen him in and laughed off the thread thinks I value his respect.With rookies. He would get his ass ate up by someone that actually debates the point.Shapiro is vary good at taking an argument, changing it into something different, and winning the new argument.
He crushed Cenk and numerous others. You're too dumb to see that. Then again you have been destroyed in every debate on these boards. People consider you a joke. I at least treat you with some level of respect as fellow ex soldiers but man you've lost it.
You don't know who Cenk is? Oh my.
Cenk Uygur - Wikipedia
You suffer from PTSD I see as you're delusional. Please explain why you, yes you, have lost every single debate on these boards that I have observed. In fact you were embarrassed.
You just lost the debate because you just used false equivalency which is a logical fallacy. Dude you arent even on the students level.I never said it was posted by the same person. I said it was posted. Only a dummy thinks you tube establishes credibility.Yes. Every single video was posted dummy. How do you think it got there?You tube only proves someone posted a video dummy.
In your opinion? No one takes your opinion seriously. If you consider humor an emotion you could say its close.
One or two sure, but over 100? Nope. Learn stats. Dummy.
Doesn't mean it was posted by the same person. Also means that proof is there for you to see it.
Doesn't make it not credible. I can post game 6 of the 1986-87 NBA championship game. Would that make the game invalid? See you just lost another debate. Man you're like the Cleveland Browns of these boards. Just an embarrassment. Don't you feel tired of looking perpetually stupid?
Funny considering that all liberal arguments use emotion instead of reason.Ben Shapiro is the man and would smother anyone in a debate. Don't believe me? Check out YouTube and 100s of examples.
Shapiro couldnt debate his way out of a wet paper bag. His whole stitch is to get people emotional. That doesnt work on people that know better. As it is he would have been beaten if the kid had kept his wits about him.
Nice opinion.When you see the child reacting to its world, breathing for itself and transitioning between moods.
When you see the child reacting to its world, breathing for itself and transitioning between moods.If the kid had simply said established sentience Shapiro would have lost the debate. And this was a kid? Big whoop. Shapiro should be embarrassed.STUDENT:
“I just wanted to know why exactly do you think a first-trimester fetus has moral value?” the unidentified student asked.
SHAPIRO:
“A first trimester fetus has moral value because whether you consider it a potential human life or a full-on human life, it has more value than just a cluster of cells. If left to its natural processes, it will grow into a baby.”
"So the real question is where are you gonna draw the line? Are you gonna draw the line at the heartbeat? Because it’s very hard to draw the line at the heartbeat. There are people who are adults who are alive because of a pacemaker and they need some sort of outside force generating their heartbeat.”
"Are you going to do it based on brain function? OK, well what about people who are in a coma? Should we just kill them?”
"The problem is that whenever you draw any line other than the inception of the child, you end up drawing a false line that can be applied to people who are adults. So either human life has intrinsic value or it doesn’t.”
SHAPIRO:
“We both agree that adult human life has intrinsic value — can we start from that premise?”
STUDENT:
I believe that sentience (the capacity to feel and perceive, or to reason morally) is what gives something moral value, not necessarily being a human alone”
SHAPIRO:
“OK, so when you’re asleep, can I stab you?”
STUDENT:
“I’m still considered sentient when I’m asleep,”
SHAPIRO:
“OK, if you are in a coma from which you may awake, can I stab you?”
STUDENT:
“Well, then, uhh, no - That’s still potential sentience."
SHAPIRO:
"I agree it is potential sentience. You know what else is potential sentience? Being a fetus”
The student should thank Mr. Shapiro for the FREE EDUCATION / LESSON!
Watch: Student asks Ben Shapiro why a fetus is human life — his answer leaves student speechless
Where does this "established sentience" come from? How do you know it when you see it?
You just lost the debate because you just used false equivalency which is a logical fallacy. Dude you arent even on the students level.I never said it was posted by the same person. I said it was posted. Only a dummy thinks you tube establishes credibility.Yes. Every single video was posted dummy. How do you think it got there?One or two sure, but over 100? Nope. Learn stats. Dummy.
Doesn't mean it was posted by the same person. Also means that proof is there for you to see it.
Doesn't make it not credible. I can post game 6 of the 1986-87 NBA championship game. Would that make the game invalid? See you just lost another debate. Man you're like the Cleveland Browns of these boards. Just an embarrassment. Don't you feel tired of looking perpetually stupid?
With rookies. He would get his ass ate up by someone that actually debates the point.Shapiro is vary good at taking an argument, changing it into something different, and winning the new argument.Ben Shapiro is the man and would smother anyone in a debate. Don't believe me? Check out YouTube and 100s of examples.
Shapiro couldnt debate his way out of a wet paper bag. His whole stitch is to get people emotional. That doesnt work on people that know better.
Yet YouTube proves otherwise. I guess very few people "know better"? IMO you've lost every debate on these boards. Too emotional for you?
Breathing indicates the body is reacting and working with its environment without the mom doing it for the fetus. Thats kind of part of what sentience is.When you see the child reacting to its world, breathing for itself and transitioning between moods.If the kid had simply said established sentience Shapiro would have lost the debate. And this was a kid? Big whoop. Shapiro should be embarrassed.STUDENT:
“I just wanted to know why exactly do you think a first-trimester fetus has moral value?” the unidentified student asked.
SHAPIRO:
“A first trimester fetus has moral value because whether you consider it a potential human life or a full-on human life, it has more value than just a cluster of cells. If left to its natural processes, it will grow into a baby.”
"So the real question is where are you gonna draw the line? Are you gonna draw the line at the heartbeat? Because it’s very hard to draw the line at the heartbeat. There are people who are adults who are alive because of a pacemaker and they need some sort of outside force generating their heartbeat.”
"Are you going to do it based on brain function? OK, well what about people who are in a coma? Should we just kill them?”
"The problem is that whenever you draw any line other than the inception of the child, you end up drawing a false line that can be applied to people who are adults. So either human life has intrinsic value or it doesn’t.”
SHAPIRO:
“We both agree that adult human life has intrinsic value — can we start from that premise?”
STUDENT:
I believe that sentience (the capacity to feel and perceive, or to reason morally) is what gives something moral value, not necessarily being a human alone”
SHAPIRO:
“OK, so when you’re asleep, can I stab you?”
STUDENT:
“I’m still considered sentient when I’m asleep,”
SHAPIRO:
“OK, if you are in a coma from which you may awake, can I stab you?”
STUDENT:
“Well, then, uhh, no - That’s still potential sentience."
SHAPIRO:
"I agree it is potential sentience. You know what else is potential sentience? Being a fetus”
The student should thank Mr. Shapiro for the FREE EDUCATION / LESSON!
Watch: Student asks Ben Shapiro why a fetus is human life — his answer leaves student speechless
Where does this "established sentience" come from? How do you know it when you see it?
What does breathing have to do with "established sentience"?
Plants react to their world, that means they've established sentience, right?
Alexa and Siri transition between moods, are they a new form of life?
Well that kid tried. Amazing how you were wrong again.With rookies. He would get his ass ate up by someone that actually debates the point.Shapiro is vary good at taking an argument, changing it into something different, and winning the new argument.Ben Shapiro is the man and would smother anyone in a debate. Don't believe me? Check out YouTube and 100s of examples.
Shapiro couldnt debate his way out of a wet paper bag. His whole stitch is to get people emotional. That doesnt work on people that know better.
Yet YouTube proves otherwise. I guess very few people "know better"? IMO you've lost every debate on these boards. Too emotional for you?
Yet no one ever tries. Amazing, that. Face it, he's very sharp.
Go sit down somewhere before you hurt yourself loser.You just lost the debate because you just used false equivalency which is a logical fallacy. Dude you arent even on the students level.I never said it was posted by the same person. I said it was posted. Only a dummy thinks you tube establishes credibility.Yes. Every single video was posted dummy. How do you think it got there?
Doesn't mean it was posted by the same person. Also means that proof is there for you to see it.
Doesn't make it not credible. I can post game 6 of the 1986-87 NBA championship game. Would that make the game invalid? See you just lost another debate. Man you're like the Cleveland Browns of these boards. Just an embarrassment. Don't you feel tired of looking perpetually stupid?
HA!!! You fell for it. I knew eventually you'd use my own "lost debate" tease against me. You're so predictable. Poke successful. At least you have the guts to reply. MarcATL turtled and ran and hid from me like the coward that he is. Good day.
He he he he he you got poked....he he he he he.
