Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Perjury will enhance her democrat nomination chances and create a moveon.org/part2.Hillary is on record and any lying will cause her to be prosecuted for perjury.
Uhs... and Umm are not part of Gowdy's speech patterns.Please take your partisan bullshit and stow it.Very presidential-type speech from Hillary, compared to rambling from Gowdy and Roskam.
Roskam tried to interrupt her answer, right after Gowdy pledged there would be no such interruptions. That didn't make him look good. Hillary just cut him off, then schooled him.
Gowdy did not ramble, he is a veteran prosecutor and knows what he is doing at least with his opening statements.
One day libtards may realize that the rest of the world is not full of morons like the other libtards they associate with.
She is under oath during this hearing and subject to perjury charges.Hillary is on record and any lying will cause her to be prosecuted for perjury.
Or perhaps the answer is much more simple. She's telling the truth. To a brainwashed simpleton, it may not seem so.She is under oath during this hearing and subject to perjury charges.Hillary is on record and any lying will cause her to be prosecuted for perjury.
I can't believe she agreed to that......but she must think she's being protected like she was during the debates.
Yes, he didn't want the office he was working from to look like an armed camp. He wanted Libyans to be able to visit the office Americans had established. All that's been published before.At some point, didn't stevens turn down additional security? I might be wrong.. for some reason that is lingering in my mind..
Or perhaps the answer is much more simple. She's telling the truth. To a brainwashed simpleton, it may not seem so.She is under oath during this hearing and subject to perjury charges.Hillary is on record and any lying will cause her to be prosecuted for perjury.
I can't believe she agreed to that......but she must think she's being protected like she was during the debates.
She said the attack happened, no doubt about that. But it took about 10 days to get the entire picture from the CIA, the Libyan government and other experts.Or perhaps the answer is much more simple. She's telling the truth. To a brainwashed simpleton, it may not seem so.She is under oath during this hearing and subject to perjury charges.Hillary is on record and any lying will cause her to be prosecuted for perjury.
I can't believe she agreed to that......but she must think she's being protected like she was during the debates.
Her e-mail to the Egyptian Prime Minster said that it was not the video but a planned al-Qaeda attack.
She lied to the families and said it was the video.
Hillary is on record and any lying will cause her to be prosecuted for perjury.
She said the attack happened, no doubt about that. But it took about 10 days to get the entire picture from the CIA, the Libyan government and other experts.
That sounds about right.
Then why did she email Chelsea that it was an AlQaeda attack? That day?She said the attack happened, no doubt about that. But it took about 10 days to get the entire picture from the CIA, the Libyan government and other experts.Or perhaps the answer is much more simple. She's telling the truth. To a brainwashed simpleton, it may not seem so.She is under oath during this hearing and subject to perjury charges.Hillary is on record and any lying will cause her to be prosecuted for perjury.
I can't believe she agreed to that......but she must think she's being protected like she was during the debates.
Her e-mail to the Egyptian Prime Minster said that it was not the video but a planned al-Qaeda attack.
She lied to the families and said it was the video.
That sounds about right.