Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Americans care deeply about this but Low information Democrat voters only care about getting their government cheese
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
Most Americans have never heard of Benghazi. They have no idea what happened. The media was successful in keeping the news away from the public.
Oh bullshit you wingnuts have been shouting from the roof top on this crap ,faux news tried soooo hard during the election to get this pushed as a scandal & the American people are not buying the bullshit . Mittens got his face kicked in on national tv , so yes the people know about it & they do not care.
GOP
Yeah, and if Bush were POTUS during Benghazi you'd be screaming like a stuck pig.
Benghazi was completely preventable. They had the warnings. Barry's State Department did nothing. Four very good men, one an Ambassador, died because of the Obama State Departments ineptitude.
The kicker for me was Barry jetting off to his fundraiser while HIS consulate was under attack and HIS Ambassador and three other very good men were dying. That tells me all I need to know about that fuck.
Most folks don't even know who they're Senators or Congressmen are. I doubt most could tell you anything about Benghazi because most don't watch anything and pay no attention.
You can bet your ass anyone in the Military was paying attention about Benghazi just as I was.
Same as all the other non-existent Obama scandals.
Real Americans care that 4 people were killed when the damn Rs refused security.
The R/rw's only care if they can use those deaths to hurt the president.
No one was told to stand down Military chief disputes "stand down" claim on Benghazi ? CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
Faux dupes
The quote you sited was in response to "Problem is his State Department did jack shit even though they had warnings up the ass. The whole thing was preventable."
Not a response to request for military support during the assault. But the answer to why the military was not sent in has been provided by the military leaders.
They were told to stand down. So you actually believe that Obama was lied to by his own military advisors who never explained why they did that and he and his administration repeated it and when he was told that he said it was fine because obviously the Military knew what they were doing. Seriously, you believe that?
Who is "they" and who told them to "Stand Down"
No one was told to stand down Military chief disputes "stand down" claim on Benghazi ? CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
Faux dupes
Even that says that different military said different things and offers nothing except that different military people said different things. CNN also reported that the troops were told to "stand down." Why exactly does that make the ones you agree with the ones who are telling the truth?
No one was told to stand down Military chief disputes "stand down" claim on Benghazi ? CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
Faux dupes
Even that says that different military said different things and offers nothing except that different military people said different things. CNN also reported that the troops were told to "stand down." Why exactly does that make the ones you agree with the ones who are telling the truth?
CNN gets stuff wrong from time to time.
No one was told to stand down Military chief disputes "stand down" claim on Benghazi ? CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
Faux dupes
Even that says that different military said different things and offers nothing except that different military people said different things. CNN also reported that the troops were told to "stand down." Why exactly does that make the ones you agree with the ones who are telling the truth?
No one was told to stand down Military chief disputes "stand down" claim on Benghazi ? CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
Faux dupes
Even that says that different military said different things and offers nothing except that different military people said different things. CNN also reported that the troops were told to "stand down." Why exactly does that make the ones you agree with the ones who are telling the truth?
No matter how much your fax brain tells you , they where not told to stand down .
Obama showed more emotion over wanting to just be left alone to eat his waffle than he did over the deaths of Americans in Benghazi.
Obama showed more emotion over wanting to just be left alone to eat his waffle than he did over the deaths of Americans in Benghazi.
Don't you think that is just a little bit overstated?
They were told to stand down. So you actually believe that Obama was lied to by his own military advisors who never explained why they did that and he and his administration repeated it and when he was told that he said it was fine because obviously the Military knew what they were doing. Seriously, you believe that?
Who is "they" and who told them to "Stand Down"
You didn't read the link your libbie bud provided, did you?
Who is "they" and who told them to "Stand Down"
You didn't read the link your libbie bud provided, did you?
I responded to what you posted.
Why don't Americans care more?
Let's see now. We have witnesses who are referred to as 'whistleblowers' who aren't testifying about any illegality or any secret insider information. That means they weren't really whistleblowers. They were merely given that moniker by people who liked the sound of it.
Then we have the so-called order to 'stand down.' There was no order to stand down. Again, it just sounded good in a sound byte.
The alleged Benghazi 'scandal' (another overused term) is another in a long line of manufactured outrages meant to gin up anti administration feeling in order to hopefully derail either the reelection of Obama (it failed) or Obama's 2nd term agenda on the Republicans' push toward the midterm election. And if this one doesn't work, they'll keep trying to find one.
You see, conservatives spent a few weeks bemoaning their unexpected loss to the president which took them completely by surprise due to their supreme confidence in light of four years of bashing Obama in every medium imaginable. Now they've brushed that loss aside, and instead of learning anything from their loss(es), they're back to their old tactics, in part, because it's their modus operandi. Because God only knows that governance isn't it.
You can judge everything by Watergate. At first people didn't care about what the president knew or didn't know about a 3rd rate burglary but the media cared-a lot. Today people don't much care about the responsibility of the secretary of state or whether an ambassador was killed through the negligence of the administration unless the media cares and the left wing media only cares about protecting the administration.
Why don't Americans care more?
Let's see now. We have witnesses who are referred to as 'whistleblowers' who aren't testifying about any illegality or any secret insider information. That means they weren't really whistleblowers. They were merely given that moniker by people who liked the sound of it.
Then we have the so-called order to 'stand down.' There was no order to stand down. Again, it just sounded good in a sound byte.
The alleged Benghazi 'scandal' (another overused term) is another in a long line of manufactured outrages meant to gin up anti administration feeling in order to hopefully derail either the reelection of Obama (it failed) or Obama's 2nd term agenda on the Republicans' push toward the midterm election. And if this one doesn't work, they'll keep trying to find one.
You see, conservatives spent a few weeks bemoaning their unexpected loss to the president which took them completely by surprise due to their supreme confidence in light of four years of bashing Obama in every medium imaginable. Now they've brushed that loss aside, and instead of learning anything from their loss(es), they're back to their old tactics, in part, because it's their modus operandi. Because God only knows that governance isn't it.
Obama covering it up proves that it's a non issue that shouldn't be investigated. Wow, Nixon would have liked you being a Republican in the 70s...
Here are two big ones:Why don't Americans care more?
Let's see now. We have witnesses who are referred to as 'whistleblowers' who aren't testifying about any illegality or any secret insider information. That means they weren't really whistleblowers. They were merely given that moniker by people who liked the sound of it.
Then we have the so-called order to 'stand down.' There was no order to stand down. Again, it just sounded good in a sound byte.
The alleged Benghazi 'scandal' (another overused term) is another in a long line of manufactured outrages meant to gin up anti administration feeling in order to hopefully derail either the reelection of Obama (it failed) or Obama's 2nd term agenda on the Republicans' push toward the midterm election. And if this one doesn't work, they'll keep trying to find one.
You see, conservatives spent a few weeks bemoaning their unexpected loss to the president which took them completely by surprise due to their supreme confidence in light of four years of bashing Obama in every medium imaginable. Now they've brushed that loss aside, and instead of learning anything from their loss(es), they're back to their old tactics, in part, because it's their modus operandi. Because God only knows that governance isn't it.
Obama covering it up proves that it's a non issue that shouldn't be investigated. Wow, Nixon would have liked you being a Republican in the 70s...
What was covered up?
