martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 83,093
- 34,385
- 2,300
Being pro-choice is not the same thing as being pro-abortion. It just means that the right to decide this philosophical question remains with the only person qualified to make this decision according to her own views, the person who is pregnant. This is not an issue for government or for politicians or for religious leaders. I've known people who decided to continue a pregnancy to birth and people who chose to terminate the pregnancy.
ShoutYourAbortion - Wikipedia
Sorry, but unless medically nessasary or due to something like rape, a elective abortion due to the inconvenience of having a kid is something to be ashamed of. There are plenty of ways to prevent becoming pregnant.
You don't know anything per your sputtering about "inconvenience." What have you to say to those dumbfucks who do not want people to know about, and have access to, "ways to prevent becoming pregnant"? They try to enforce ignorance, and then complain. Sometimes these methods do not work. Abortion is only a backup.
A close friend of mine got pregnant by her husband, with an IUD, and she is a type I diabetic, but she chose to carry on with the pregnancy against her doctor's advice. She had to endure months of bed rest, and the birth was horrific. The point is that she made her own decision, without the input of the government and cheap politicians.
They should have used double protection. In Engineering only one method of control isn't considered control at all.