Brain357
Platinum Member
- Mar 30, 2013
- 37,068
- 4,189
If it was feasible it would happen. But even with a republican congress nothing is going to happen. What you want is political suicide and nobody is going to do that. Heck cutting welfare now without creating jobs would quickly tank the economy so its economic suicide too.And those people get a check from the gov because their employer hoses them. Either the gov or the employers need to provide for them. If you want small gov the only answer is the employer. This isn't so hard to understand.
NO, they get a check from the government because fools like you voted to give it to them. However you rationalize that decision is beside the point. The way you get small government is by voting for it. Unfortunately there are too many ticks sucking on the ass of society to make that immediately feasible.
Immediately feasible? That is never feasible as long as employers keep cutting pay, benefits, and retirement. Those rich people you worship are moving us farther away each year.
It's easily feasible. As I've noted numerous times, employers are not the legal guardians of their employees. They aren't legally obligated to provide them with food, clothing or housing. That's purely a fetish of commies like you.
It's not politically feasible. It's feasible by any other measure.
What I want is for things to continue as they are now, people freely negotiating a wage with their employers. How is that going to "tank the economy?" If anything, what you are demanding would tank Wal-Mart and any other company that pays less than a "living wage."
Almost everything you post is commie bullshit.
Commies want small government? Everything I suggest would get people off welfare and give the economy a boost.