Beware the Morality of the Democrats

[Doc7505]

”Progressives” are on an unholy crusade.

They are religious zealots who blindly believe in their Agenda. Since, as they see it, their goals are righteous, they have the moral authority to judge anyone who opposes them as heretics. Once you have been identified as a non-believer, they have the moral authority to destroy you. They are within their rights to mock you, bully you, get you fired, make your life a living hell, and even punch you in the face, or worse.

This brand of extremism of the far left is especially dangerous. Normal radical extremists are usually rooted in some kind of codified law, such as Islam. However what we are seeing with the radical left is even more dangerous, because it is not codified in anything. It’s a loose set ideas that can change the rules on the fly. It is the evil of relativism. Since their religion is heavily rooted in identity politics, they can use any reason to destroy any person. One day you might be in their good graces because you are a black liberal socialist, the next day you are strung up because you once made a gay joke years ago and you are now a “bigot”.

~~~~~~
So basically, you've identified the Progressive Marxist Socialist Left not only as dangerous but bigoted, hypocritical and racist at every turn of their aims.

 

[otto105]

Beware the Morality of the Democrats​

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/02/beware_the_morality_of_the_democrats.html#ixzz5eVckcutM
​

By Jeffrey T. Brown ~~ The Democrats have laid claim to be the new arbiters of “morality.” They declare “immoral” anything that has the potential to thwart them, whether it’s a wall, a hat, a facial expression, or even religion itself, particularly Christianity. This has invited soul searching on the question of whether Democrats are right or wrong in their selective declaration of morality. Some are led to ask whether Democrats might be right -- could a wall be evidence of immorality? What if my desire to protect my country, my family and myself is actually bigoted, and therefore immoral? Such navel gazing by an objectively decent person is foolish. It is intended to bring about either a flawed acceptance of the left’s version of morality, or a subtle coercion to offer no further support for something that arguably offends others, presuming their good faith in being offended. The accusation of immorality, whether express or implied, represents a distraction from the Democrats’ efforts to subvert the country and its inherently moral principles.... The Democrats have laid claim to be the new arbiters of “morality.” They declare “immoral” anything that has the potential to thwart them, whether it’s a wall, a hat, a facial expression, or even religion itself, particularly Christianity. This has invited soul searching on the question of whether Democrats are right or wrong in their selective declaration of morality. Some are led to ask whether Democrats might be right -- could a wall be evidence of immorality? What if my desire to protect my country, my family and myself is actually bigoted, and therefore immoral?


~~~~~~
Our Framers believed in Liberty and their revolution was justified as it was to secure liberty from tyranny. The French and most other European Revolutions were not with the long-term aim of Liberty, but Equality. When violence and force is used for the aim of Equality, it always and everywhere results in TERROR.
A revolution for Liberty means that each man and woman has Individual, Constitutional Rights that are given by God and Inalienable. Violence and force to impose Equality is not even a legitimate revolution, and since it is about facetious "Positive Rights" granted by men, the "Collective" can only be enforced by violence and force. So when the Progressive Marxist Socialist Left begins their arguments standing on their heads talking backwards, it is not surprising that only violence and force will suffice in enforcing compliance for tyrants.
The so called modern Progressive Left isn't moral. They don't subscribe to the idea of morality, their actions cannot be predicted based on consistent moral grounds, they lie as a matter of course and they don't believe in anything they say they believe in. They are elitist opportunists in search of more power.
Consider immigration; Many of the Elitist left supported a wall before they didn't and saw illegal immigration as a problem before claiming that the crisis was manufactured. Facts don't back up their current position so they are left trying to trot out "morality". They claim that every vote should count, appeals to the power of a centralized federal government but when the votes are in and the people's representatives have voted for border control and the courts have confirmed laws concerning immigration, mayors simply declare they oversee a "sanctuary city". So if you can't reason with them, the vote doesn't count, law doesn't matter and the courts are ignored there isn't much left except a shooting war.

Can you tell me if our framers (who you claim belived in equality) were racists?

 

[deanrd]

Liberals are far more moral than Conservatives. Cause we actually care about people .

Cons are a bunch of moral phonies . They go to church on Sunday , but learn nothing while they are there . Jesus would spit in your hatefilled faces .

Yeah, like the way you want to punch 15 year old boys in the face for wearing a MAGA hat? Now that's caring! How about the way you encourage people in Honduras to travel 1500 miles only so they can be prevented from crossing the US border? Yeah, that's caring.

James A. Fields Jr. sentenced to life in prison in Charlottesville car attack

Man shouting 'anti-Muslim slurs' kills 2 on Portland train, police say

Was there some connection between what I posted and what you posted? Did any Republican defend James A. Fields Jr?

I hear some of the Nazis in Charlottesville were "nice people".

You didn't hear it from Trump, asshole.

2:38

but you also had some people, some very fine people on both sides.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Since Trump's election, I have watched the pseuedocons saw off their own moral legs.

It's hilarious now to watch them sitting in judgment of others.

Fucking. Hilarious.

Did coonman tell you to say that?

 

[Bush92]

Beware the Morality of the Democrats​

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/02/beware_the_morality_of_the_democrats.html#ixzz5eVckcutM
​

By Jeffrey T. Brown ~~ The Democrats have laid claim to be the new arbiters of “morality.” They declare “immoral” anything that has the potential to thwart them, whether it’s a wall, a hat, a facial expression, or even religion itself, particularly Christianity. This has invited soul searching on the question of whether Democrats are right or wrong in their selective declaration of morality. Some are led to ask whether Democrats might be right -- could a wall be evidence of immorality? What if my desire to protect my country, my family and myself is actually bigoted, and therefore immoral? Such navel gazing by an objectively decent person is foolish. It is intended to bring about either a flawed acceptance of the left’s version of morality, or a subtle coercion to offer no further support for something that arguably offends others, presuming their good faith in being offended. The accusation of immorality, whether express or implied, represents a distraction from the Democrats’ efforts to subvert the country and its inherently moral principles.... The Democrats have laid claim to be the new arbiters of “morality.” They declare “immoral” anything that has the potential to thwart them, whether it’s a wall, a hat, a facial expression, or even religion itself, particularly Christianity. This has invited soul searching on the question of whether Democrats are right or wrong in their selective declaration of morality. Some are led to ask whether Democrats might be right -- could a wall be evidence of immorality? What if my desire to protect my country, my family and myself is actually bigoted, and therefore immoral?


~~~~~~
Our Framers believed in Liberty and their revolution was justified as it was to secure liberty from tyranny. The French and most other European Revolutions were not with the long-term aim of Liberty, but Equality. When violence and force is used for the aim of Equality, it always and everywhere results in TERROR.
A revolution for Liberty means that each man and woman has Individual, Constitutional Rights that are given by God and Inalienable. Violence and force to impose Equality is not even a legitimate revolution, and since it is about facetious "Positive Rights" granted by men, the "Collective" can only be enforced by violence and force. So when the Progressive Marxist Socialist Left begins their arguments standing on their heads talking backwards, it is not surprising that only violence and force will suffice in enforcing compliance for tyrants.
The so called modern Progressive Left isn't moral. They don't subscribe to the idea of morality, their actions cannot be predicted based on consistent moral grounds, they lie as a matter of course and they don't believe in anything they say they believe in. They are elitist opportunists in search of more power.
Consider immigration; Many of the Elitist left supported a wall before they didn't and saw illegal immigration as a problem before claiming that the crisis was manufactured. Facts don't back up their current position so they are left trying to trot out "morality". They claim that every vote should count, appeals to the power of a centralized federal government but when the votes are in and the people's representatives have voted for border control and the courts have confirmed laws concerning immigration, mayors simply declare they oversee a "sanctuary city". So if you can't reason with them, the vote doesn't count, law doesn't matter and the courts are ignored there isn't much left except a shooting war.

Morality and Democrats. Mutually exclusive terms.

 

[Bush92]

Since Trump's election, I have watched the pseuedocons saw off their own moral legs.

It's hilarious now to watch them sitting in judgment of others.

Fucking. Hilarious.

Did coonman tell you to say that?

“Camp town race track 5 mile long...do-da...do-da...de camp town race track 5 mile long all de do-da day.”

 

[airplanemechanic]

Whats funny is nothing from the left about coonman first apologizing about his yearbook photo on video to the nation, then saying it wasn't him, then saying that he wasn't sure.

The left is in freefall right now. And I'm laughing at them all the way down! LOL

 

[Bush92]

Liberals are far more moral than Conservatives. Cause we actually care about people .

Cons are a bunch of moral phonies . They go to church on Sunday , but learn nothing while they are there . Jesus would spit in your hatefilled faces .

Infanticide. Nuff said.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Liberals are far more moral than Conservatives. Cause we actually care about people .

Cons are a bunch of moral phonies . They go to church on Sunday , but learn nothing while they are there . Jesus would spit in your hatefilled faces .

Coonman, 'nuff said.

 

[Bush92]

Since Trump's election, I have watched the pseuedocons saw off their own moral legs.

It's hilarious now to watch them sitting in judgment of others.

Fucking. Hilarious.

Bill Clinton

 

[Bush92]

Since Trump's election, I have watched the pseuedocons saw off their own moral legs.

It's hilarious now to watch them sitting in judgment of others.

Fucking. Hilarious.

Bawney Fwank

 

[Bush92]

Since Trump's election, I have watched the pseuedocons saw off their own moral legs.

It's hilarious now to watch them sitting in judgment of others.

Fucking. Hilarious.

Kamala Toe Harris and Willie Brown.

 

[Bush92]

Since Trump's election, I have watched the pseuedocons saw off their own moral legs.

It's hilarious now to watch them sitting in judgment of others.

Fucking. Hilarious.

Kamala Toe Harris and Willie Brown.

 

[Doc7505]

Beware the Morality of the Democrats​

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/02/beware_the_morality_of_the_democrats.html#ixzz5eVckcutM
​

By Jeffrey T. Brown ~~ The Democrats have laid claim to be the new arbiters of “morality.” They declare “immoral” anything that has the potential to thwart them, whether it’s a wall, a hat, a facial expression, or even religion itself, particularly Christianity. This has invited soul searching on the question of whether Democrats are right or wrong in their selective declaration of morality. Some are led to ask whether Democrats might be right -- could a wall be evidence of immorality? What if my desire to protect my country, my family and myself is actually bigoted, and therefore immoral? Such navel gazing by an objectively decent person is foolish. It is intended to bring about either a flawed acceptance of the left’s version of morality, or a subtle coercion to offer no further support for something that arguably offends others, presuming their good faith in being offended. The accusation of immorality, whether express or implied, represents a distraction from the Democrats’ efforts to subvert the country and its inherently moral principles.... The Democrats have laid claim to be the new arbiters of “morality.” They declare “immoral” anything that has the potential to thwart them, whether it’s a wall, a hat, a facial expression, or even religion itself, particularly Christianity. This has invited soul searching on the question of whether Democrats are right or wrong in their selective declaration of morality. Some are led to ask whether Democrats might be right -- could a wall be evidence of immorality? What if my desire to protect my country, my family and myself is actually bigoted, and therefore immoral?


~~~~~~
Our Framers believed in Liberty and their revolution was justified as it was to secure liberty from tyranny. The French and most other European Revolutions were not with the long-term aim of Liberty, but Equality. When violence and force is used for the aim of Equality, it always and everywhere results in TERROR.
A revolution for Liberty means that each man and woman has Individual, Constitutional Rights that are given by God and Inalienable. Violence and force to impose Equality is not even a legitimate revolution, and since it is about facetious "Positive Rights" granted by men, the "Collective" can only be enforced by violence and force. So when the Progressive Marxist Socialist Left begins their arguments standing on their heads talking backwards, it is not surprising that only violence and force will suffice in enforcing compliance for tyrants.
The so called modern Progressive Left isn't moral. They don't subscribe to the idea of morality, their actions cannot be predicted based on consistent moral grounds, they lie as a matter of course and they don't believe in anything they say they believe in. They are elitist opportunists in search of more power.
Consider immigration; Many of the Elitist left supported a wall before they didn't and saw illegal immigration as a problem before claiming that the crisis was manufactured. Facts don't back up their current position so they are left trying to trot out "morality". They claim that every vote should count, appeals to the power of a centralized federal government but when the votes are in and the people's representatives have voted for border control and the courts have confirmed laws concerning immigration, mayors simply declare they oversee a "sanctuary city". So if you can't reason with them, the vote doesn't count, law doesn't matter and the courts are ignored there isn't much left except a shooting war.

Can you tell me if our framers (who you claim belived in equality) were racists?

The answer to that loaded question is simple. They were not racist during their time. What is considered racist in the 21st Century is not the same as the 18th,19th, and 20th Centuries. Would you consider Woodrow Wilson or Franklin D. Roosevelt racists for their actions during their era's?

 

[Bush92]

Liberals are far more moral than Conservatives. Cause we actually care about people .

Cons are a bunch of moral phonies . They go to church on Sunday , but learn nothing while they are there . Jesus would spit in your hatefilled faces .

 

[Doc7505]

Liberals are far more moral than Conservatives. Cause we actually care about people .

Cons are a bunch of moral phonies . They go to church on Sunday , but learn nothing while they are there . Jesus would spit in your hatefilled faces .

~~~~~~
Surely you exclude all those Progressive Marxist Socialist Senators and Representative of Congress that attend Church, Mosque or Synagogue weekly while spouting Communist rhetorical lies on a daily basis.

 

[deanrd]

How do Republicans say the word "morality" without their tongues splitting in two and bursting into flame?

 

[Doc7505]

How do Republicans say the word "morality" without their tongues splitting in two and bursting into flame?

~~~~~~
Funny, we keep asking the same about people like you that prefer to elect and support racist Governors and sexual assaulters as Lt. Gov, meanwhile they decry their opposites and go after people like Judge Moore, and Judge Kavanaugh. It's strange that you would revere racists like Wilson and FDR that segregated Blacks and Whites in the military and created concentration (internment) camps to hold Japanese, Germans and Italians. Yet you claim that you're for equal rights. The question then is why did less than 60% of Democrats vote for the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

 

[otto105]

Beware the Morality of the Democrats​

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/02/beware_the_morality_of_the_democrats.html#ixzz5eVckcutM
​

By Jeffrey T. Brown ~~ The Democrats have laid claim to be the new arbiters of “morality.” They declare “immoral” anything that has the potential to thwart them, whether it’s a wall, a hat, a facial expression, or even religion itself, particularly Christianity. This has invited soul searching on the question of whether Democrats are right or wrong in their selective declaration of morality. Some are led to ask whether Democrats might be right -- could a wall be evidence of immorality? What if my desire to protect my country, my family and myself is actually bigoted, and therefore immoral? Such navel gazing by an objectively decent person is foolish. It is intended to bring about either a flawed acceptance of the left’s version of morality, or a subtle coercion to offer no further support for something that arguably offends others, presuming their good faith in being offended. The accusation of immorality, whether express or implied, represents a distraction from the Democrats’ efforts to subvert the country and its inherently moral principles.... The Democrats have laid claim to be the new arbiters of “morality.” They declare “immoral” anything that has the potential to thwart them, whether it’s a wall, a hat, a facial expression, or even religion itself, particularly Christianity. This has invited soul searching on the question of whether Democrats are right or wrong in their selective declaration of morality. Some are led to ask whether Democrats might be right -- could a wall be evidence of immorality? What if my desire to protect my country, my family and myself is actually bigoted, and therefore immoral?


~~~~~~
Our Framers believed in Liberty and their revolution was justified as it was to secure liberty from tyranny. The French and most other European Revolutions were not with the long-term aim of Liberty, but Equality. When violence and force is used for the aim of Equality, it always and everywhere results in TERROR.
A revolution for Liberty means that each man and woman has Individual, Constitutional Rights that are given by God and Inalienable. Violence and force to impose Equality is not even a legitimate revolution, and since it is about facetious "Positive Rights" granted by men, the "Collective" can only be enforced by violence and force. So when the Progressive Marxist Socialist Left begins their arguments standing on their heads talking backwards, it is not surprising that only violence and force will suffice in enforcing compliance for tyrants.
The so called modern Progressive Left isn't moral. They don't subscribe to the idea of morality, their actions cannot be predicted based on consistent moral grounds, they lie as a matter of course and they don't believe in anything they say they believe in. They are elitist opportunists in search of more power.
Consider immigration; Many of the Elitist left supported a wall before they didn't and saw illegal immigration as a problem before claiming that the crisis was manufactured. Facts don't back up their current position so they are left trying to trot out "morality". They claim that every vote should count, appeals to the power of a centralized federal government but when the votes are in and the people's representatives have voted for border control and the courts have confirmed laws concerning immigration, mayors simply declare they oversee a "sanctuary city". So if you can't reason with them, the vote doesn't count, law doesn't matter and the courts are ignored there isn't much left except a shooting war.

Can you tell me if our framers (who you claim belived in equality) were racists?

The answer to that loaded question is simple. They were not racist during their time. What is considered racist in the 21st Century is not the same as the 18th,19th, and 20th Centuries. Would you consider Woodrow Wilson or Franklin D. Roosevelt racists for their actions during their era's?

Yes, Woodrow Wilson was a racist. FDR was reacting to a national attack and used a racist tool.