bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,166
- 47,312
They weren't made at Trump's request, scumbag.The FBI under Trump made several requests of Twitter so your example is real life and it certainly doesn't bother me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They weren't made at Trump's request, scumbag.The FBI under Trump made several requests of Twitter so your example is real life and it certainly doesn't bother me.
Nope. People who work on classified projects agree to keep classified information secret before they take the job. That isn't censorship, moron.It is necessary for classified information.
I don't need one. I'm not a moron like you.No it's not. You should buy a dictionary.
Lol, "cult speak".>>>> You agree with me or you're a Nazi.
It was his FBI. How do you know he didn't request it?They weren't made at Trump's request, scumbag.
"His" FBI? ROFL! What a joke. The deep state has its own agenda.It was his FBI. How do you know he didn't request it?
Here is some censorship for you.Nope. People who work on classified projects agree to keep classified information secret before they take the job. That isn't censorship, moron.
I don't need one. I'm not a moron like you.
Lol, there you have it. The arguement is lost so now it's the "deep state"."His" FBI? ROFL! What a joke. The deep state has its own agenda.
So what's different about Twitter?
The theory that government agencies infested with Democrats and RINOs do the bidding of Republican presidents doesn't pass the laugh test.Lol, there you have it. The arguement is lost so now it's the "deep state".
Obviously you can't be taken seriously.
Enjoy your derp state.
What's different is requesting Twitter post or not post something doesn't meet the criterion listed in the article for what the courts have historically accepted as legal government censorship.So what's different about Twitter?
At least you admit you don’t support the First Amendment. Are there any other amendments you don’t support?The FBI under Trump made several requests of Twitter so your example is real life and it certainly doesn't bother me.
The deep state was your arguement. It's a fall back provided by Trump and amplified exponentially by your media masters.The theory that government agencies infested with Democrats and RINOs do the bidding of Republican presidents doesn't pass the laugh test.
Apparently you believe I'm required to accept your bullshit premises.
Sorry, turd. That's just plain wrong. Requesting is indistinguishable from demanding.What's different is requesting Twitter post or not post something doesn't meet the criterion listed in the article for what the courts have historically accepted as legal government censorship.
Of course the actual point was the federal government does censor despite what has been contended in this thread.
yada yada yada.The deep state was your arguement. It's a fall back provided by Trump and amplified exponentially by your media masters.
It's never Republicans fault when you can just say derp state.
Really the only reason this is even an issue with the right is because the FBI raided Mar Lago among other things that made Trump mad. When Trump get mad he attacks. When Trump attacks, his supportive media outlets also attack.
I don't even think a lot of trump worshippers even realize that most of this stuff happened under Trump not Biden. They don't care.
The fact is I don't see any lawsuits over what you are suggesting is an open shut case of government censorship.
Why is that? Do you know how utterly stupid you look when you claim something as serious as the government violating the first amendment has happened but their are no lawsuits winning cases?
Can you tell me why that is without using the term deep state?
Then you need a dictionary.Sorry, turd. That's just plain wrong. Requesting is indistinguishable from demanding.
You need a book on reality.Then you need a dictionary.
It was his FBI. How do you know he didn't request it?
Like the dictionary?You need a book on reality.
A copy of the Bill of Rights would be a good start.Like the dictionary?
The STASI hated Trump and staged a coup against him before he even took office.
Yawn, more conspiracies.The STASI are clearly the guardians of the swamp, making DC safe for corruption.
Yep, I am sure the lawsuits will include that...have you seen any yet?A copy of the Bill of Rights would be a good start.