Frankeneinstein
Gold Member
except for the coverage each gets for doing the same thingTrump called for the same thing. Yes the two sides have very little in real differences.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
except for the coverage each gets for doing the same thingTrump called for the same thing. Yes the two sides have very little in real differences.
Nor would I. Yet we have no lawsuits. Just a bunch of right wing propaganda.I have. More than you, I suspect. In any case, I won't suffer a government that doesn't respect my rights. Period.
When some shady FBI dude shows up over your shoulder, you going to say "no"?
I doubt the courts would see it that way.The force is implicit.
You can't answer that question because all you have are Jurassic media talking points.Due to lack of context; I can't answer that question accurately.
Let's stick to what happened, not some dark and stormy night narrative.
I doubt the courts would see it that way.
You can't answer that question because all you have are Jurassic media talking points.
I will deal with it when a judge deals with it. That won't happen though, so cling to your right wing fantasies.What I said is factual....Deal with it.
Don't worry. You'll still be able to piss & moan about the injustice of Trump getting his ass handed back to him in 2020 & him & his gang who couldn't think straight fucking up their coup attempt.The regime is out of control and needs to be hauled into court for their blatant disregard of the First Amendment.
The Govt is prohibited from conspiring with private entities to censor speech. Just because they don't like said speech doesn't mean the Constitution is null and void.
Bring on the spin, Democrats.
![]()
Rachel Levine ripped for demanding censorship of 'misinformation' on 'gender-affirming care' for kids
HHS Assistant Secretary Dr. Levine took heat for a recently-surfaced clip in which the official asked Big Tech to censor views disputing the positives of "gender-affirming care."www.foxnews.com
Because we have watered down the Constitution with poor Court decisions and overreaching legislation. Why do you keep asking tedious questions? Is it some version of gloating? Cheering for shit?Nor would I. Yet we have no lawsuits. Just a bunch of right wing propaganda.
Again; why is that?
from the link:
He doesn't come across as a scholar in any field from where i'm sitting.As President he has no role in what speech a website allows or disallows. But he never was a Constitutional scholar.
I've been saying it here for years: The two ends can be amazingly similar in their behaviors.Trump called for the same thing. Yes the two sides have very little in real differences.
He doesn't come across as a scholar in any field from where i'm sitting.
...if anything he evokes memories of high school, but he does seem to understand the first and second amendments better than the minions of socially educated minds we are currently selling diplomas to...
...and he does have a grasp of the constitutionally mandated electoral college that a socially educated mind just cannot grasp.
I'm not quite sure how to handle someone who debunks their own linkAs President he has no role in what speech a website allows or disallows.
and his only contribution to humanity was in 2016Trump understand whatever benefits him. Period.
I'm not quite sure how to handle someone who debunks their own link
and his only contribution to humanity was in 2016
I voted for johnson...I didn't give him/trump any chance of winning, not sure where that came from or how it happened.I do give him credit for beating Hillary.
I didn't want Trump to win but I really wanted Hillary to lose.
I voted for johnson...I didn't give him/trump any chance of winning, not sure where that came from or how it happened.
I don't post behind people's backs.Ahh... trolling for attention. How cute.![]()