Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What legal expenses did Twitter incur when they deleted a post, or banned a poster?For legal processes in accordance with the law.
18 U.S. Code § 2706 - Cost reimbursement
www.law.cornell.edu
He is awful, but - there are others much more retarded than him.Only since you arrived...
LOL
Oh, so PARTS of the 1st Amendment matter - just not the free speech parts...
Not true - most of it happened under and at the behest of Xi's Biden regime. The election tampering during the Trump presidency was done by the STASI on behalf of, and at the behest of, the fascist DNC.
Once Quid Pro became Resident this expanded - less chance of getting caught.
The STASI and the fascist party never considered that Elon Musk would buy Twitter and expose this treason..
They didn't. The fed exercised their first amendment rights and made a request to twitter.What they did was shit all over the 1st Amendment in order to corrupt our election process and promote the authoritarian lockdowns.
Oh? Because religion is bad and must be suppressed?
But wait, you're defending censoring speech not approved of by your Reich, so you must view free speech as bad too?
Do you support outlawing Fox News?
You are talking nonsense.You know, go for a trifecta of shitting on civil rights? Demand freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of the press all be revoked?
For legal processes in accordance with the law.
18 U.S. Code § 2706 - Cost reimbursement
What legal expenses did Twitter incur when they deleted a post, or banned a poster?
This should be fun.......
transparency.twitter.com
Oh REALLY?
So you can show the OF1164 filed by Twitter?
You're such a clown.
transparency.twitter.com
Yes, free speech matters. That is why you should support the fed excercising their free speech rights by making a request.
Biden wasn't president when most of this happened.
Your conspiracies make you seem desperate.
Their was no treason, only requests to not post things.
They didn't. The fed exercised their first amendment rights and made a request to twitter.
No. Because of the constitution.
No. I support free speech in accordance with the law.
No.
You are talking nonsense.
Yeah, doesn't at all support your claim.United States - X Transparency Center
Insights into information requests and removal requests originating from the United States.
Enjoy.
Right, so we need to protect "free speech" by government. It's just words from the peasants that need to be outlawed...
It started when Trump was still president, but once Quid Pro became Resident, the flood gates were opened.
What conspiracies?
You mean "Rushing coalushun?"
The Twitter files are established fact.
The FBI deliberately thwarting the 1st Amendment to corrupt our elections is treason in my book.
The fed? You mean the federal reserve bank?
People in the federal government have constitutional rights. I can't believe you don't know this.The STASI has no civil rights - they are a police agency - civil rights laws are established to protect the people FROM them - you moron.
You mean the one you support violating?
Oh, so Congress must make law defining acceptable speech and enforce speech necessary to power by the state?
Well Seig Heil to you too..
Hey, you demand freedom of speech and freedom of religion be crushed - might as well go all in.
I do. They broke the law.I mean, I'm sure you celebrate the imprisonment of those who dared protest against Biden at the Reichstag Fire...
It's from Twitter. Lol.Yeah, doesn't at all support your claim.
Which hate site are you pulling this idiocy from? Legal Insurrection? Young Turks?
yes it is.No it is not.
Ok. I can't wait to see the case in court.yes it is.
Wrong. What if the government "asked" them not to put any black newscasters on the air?As long as they don't literally put a gun to each of their heads.
There's nothing legal about hiring people to censor your customers according to the FBI's wishes.Who was hired?
Trump's administration paid Twitter for legal processes in accordance with the law.
The government has no such rights.Yes, free speech matters. That is why you should support the fed excercising their free speech rights by making a request.
The regime is out of control and needs to be hauled into court for their blatant disregard of the First Amendment.
The Govt is prohibited from conspiring with private entities to censor speech. Just because they don't like said speech doesn't mean the Constitution is null and void.
Bring on the spin, Democrats.
Rachel Levine ripped for demanding censorship of 'misinformation' on 'gender-affirming care' for kids
HHS Assistant Secretary Dr. Levine took heat for a recently-surfaced clip in which the official asked Big Tech to censor views disputing the positives of "gender-affirming care."www.foxnews.com
Yes, lying is free speech, you witless baboon. Putting the government in charge of policing "misinformation" is the police state. You made it plain that you're a tool of totalitarianism.There is no allowance for lying to the people. That's NOT free speech, that's disinformation meant to misinform and inflame hatred. Hate speech against minorities should never be allowed - like Holocaust Denial.
