Funny. They never removed the burning crosses. Guess the feds are too tough for that kinda work. They only pick on insurrectionists. lolSrsly? This is about removing, or not removing concertina wire. You're smarter than that scruff.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Funny. They never removed the burning crosses. Guess the feds are too tough for that kinda work. They only pick on insurrectionists. lolSrsly? This is about removing, or not removing concertina wire. You're smarter than that scruff.
You seem to miss the point that that those military assets are FEDERAL assets, not Texas assets.It's kind of funny in a way to see the usual suspects completely miss the reality that Texas has military assets within its borders, so if it comes to a shooting war, it will by no means be anything easy. In fact, it would be the fastest way ever to get TRUMP! re-elected and Quid Pro sent to retirement if he were to try it.
They're like SciFi automatons without a mothership. The DISUSTING FILTH in the media is almost completely ignoring this crisis and, therefore, so are all the communist-leaning message boards where our resident dimocrap scum get their talking points and witty rebuttals.The point on your head?
You're getting a hard on for a dog?
WTF is the matter with you leftards?
It says that the Biden Admin border officers have the right to remove the razor wire and can't be kept from doing so, nor kept away from the border. So, technically you are right. In a round about way, it's telling the Texas Nat Guard not to interfere with the removal, or suffer the consequences.You didn't read the SCOTUS Order, huh? It doesn't order Abbott/Texas to do not not do anything. Your Ignorance combine with arrogance is not a good look.
As I understand it, the complaint about the razor wire is that it prevents the Border patrol from assisting illegal aliens approaching the border from Mexico. So removing the wire allows the BP to assist illegal aliens in violating the border.Srsly? This is about removing, or not removing concertina wire. You're smarter than that scruff.
Yeah, um the Court said the Feds can cut razor wire. That's not anything to do with Abbott.![]()
Supreme Court says Biden administration can remove razor wire that Texas installed along border
Texas has assembled razor wire along some sections of the U.S.-Mexico border to try to deter migrants from entering the country illegally.www.cbsnews.com
Abbot is responsible for the Texas National Guard. He can be found in contempt if he does not order them to stand down.
Don't go Daffy on me.Funny. They never removed the burning crosses. Guess the feds are too tough for that kinda work. They only pick on insurrectionists. lol![]()
And you seem to forget that, should Quid Pro attempt to set the military against Texas, that the military would not unilaterally follow the orders, including many of those with access to bases in Texas. No, it is not a foregone conclusion at all that Quid Pro would have a unified military at his petty beck and call. You also seem to forget that many of the active military personnel are born and raised Texans. Oh, well, hubris it is.You seem to miss the point that that those military assets are FEDERAL assets, not Texas assets.
Though seeing a bunch of deranged hillbillies try to take over a military base (and fail spectacularly) would make for good reality TV.
The Court didnt order the Feds to cut razor wire. They simply said they could. There is no order directing anyone to do anything. Try againAbbot is responsible for the Teaxs National Guard. The Texas national guard is blocking federal agents from executing the SCOTUS decision.
Abbot or anyone in the TNG can be found in contempt.
It also keeps them from drowning.As I understand it, the complaint about the razor wire is that it prevents the Border patrol from assisting illegal aliens approaching the border from Mexico. So removing the wire allows the BP to assist illegal aliens in violating the border.
FJBIt says that the Biden Admin border officers have the right to remove the razor wire and can't be kept from doing so, nor kept away from the border. So, technically you are right. In a round about way, it's telling the Texas Nat Guard not to interfere with the removal, or suffer the consequences.
You are dreaming.And you seem to forget that, should Quid Pro attempt to set the military against Texas, that the military would not unilaterally follow the orders, including many of those with access to bases in Texas. No, it is not a foregone conclusion at all that Quid Pro would have a unified military at his petty beck and call. You also seem to forget that many of the active military personnel are born and raised Texans. Oh, well, hubris it is.
Dark Brandon does not agree with you.
You really don't want to face the full power of the federal government.
It says that the Biden Admin border officers have the right to remove the razor wire and can't be kept from doing so, nor kept away from the border.
The application to vacate injunction presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is granted. The December 19, 2023 order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, case No. 23-50869, is vacated.
Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, Justice Gorsuch, and Justice Kavanaugh would deny the application to vacate injunction
Nope. Nothing "round about" about it. The Court simply vacated the injunction imposed by the 5th circuit on the Biden Administration. Nothing about the Texas National Guard. That would be a completely different lawsuit.So, technically you are right. In a round about way, it's telling the Texas Nat Guard not to interfere with the removal, or suffer the consequences.
ZzzDark Brandon does not agree with you.
Get yo revolution on!Screw the federal govt.
The law you cited has nothing to do with the topic and you haven’t even tried to provide any explanation for its relevance.It isn’t clear. The law I cited is on point.
You’re quite ignorant.
By the way, imbeciles like you tend to clutter shit up.
The REASON — the PURPOSE — for which our border agents have access to land is to ENFORCE our immigration laws.
By contrast, President Potato is demanding access to defeat enforcement of our immigration laws.
Reality tends to confuse you libturds.
Why are you constantly compelled to insult me? Do you feel like the bigger man that you could never be IRL?Zzz
Potato is a Retard. Like you.
Youre in denial. Try actually reading it, you idiot.The law you cited has nothing to do with the topic and you haven’t even tried to provide any explanation for its relevance.
No. My assertion is a statement of fact based on how little our government is doing to stem the flow (flood) of illegal immigrants.Your opinion on how the Border Patrol is doing their job is irrelevant and not based on fact.
The state can and is.The state cannot prevent the border patrol from accessing the border.