Orangecat
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 17,693
- 19,587
- 2,288
Why would a clock break from someone lying?Trump broke the clock, after telling more than 30,000 lies.
You're an idiot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Why would a clock break from someone lying?Trump broke the clock, after telling more than 30,000 lies.
You also show you have no problem with religious discrimination or racism.I have no problem with a ban on Muslims. They are all terrorists or supporters of terrorism.
Trumps own words of his travel ban being based on religion . . . .
Apparently you hold to the "everything Trump said to get elected was a lie" theory. That he never intended to fulfill anything he said. Hence his promise to enact a muslim ban, was replaced by a ban that had nothing to do with it.See? That is bullshit. The nations in the ban ae the same exactly nation that Obama said were danger sources. The language of the ban itself said nothing about religion. All it did was follow through on an Obama era recommendation.
It's from the devils "adultery" clock.Why would a clock break from someone lying?Trump broke the clock, after telling more than 30,000 lies.
You're an idiot.
You attributed what I said to yourself.You also show you have no problem with religious discrimination or racism.I have no problem with a ban on Muslims. They are all terrorists or supporters of terrorism.
It doesn't matter what Trump said. His EO said nothing about Muslims, so it wasn't a Muslim ban.Trumps own words of his travel ban being based on religion . . . .Apparently you hold to the "everything Trump said to get elected was a lie" theory. That he never intended to fulfill anything he said. Hence his promise to enact a muslim ban, was replaced by a ban that had nothing to do with it.See? That is bullshit. The nations in the ban ae the same exactly nation that Obama said were danger sources. The language of the ban itself said nothing about religion. All it did was follow through on an Obama era recommendation.
I have no problem with keep Muslims out of this country. They are the scum of humanity. Anyone who believes in the abracadabra that they swear by is mentally defective.
Are you abandoning the conservative judicial view of "original intent"?It doesn't matter what Trump said. His EO said nothing about Muslims, so it wasn't a Muslim ban.
It doesn't matter what Trump said. His EO said nothing about Muslims, so it wasn't a Muslim ban.
Not.Sure, like Benny the Bully would ever tell the truth about anything.
Ridiculous stupid statement. FAIL
Pretty sure those Dimwinger laws were racist.It doesn't matter what Trump said. His EO said nothing about Muslims, so it wasn't a Muslim ban.
I presume you hold the same view of the Jim Crow laws. That they didn't discriminate either.
Then why didn't you tell Bripat how wrong he is.Pretty sure those Dimwinger laws were racist.I presume you hold the same view of the Jim Crow laws. That they didn't discriminate either.
It doesn't matter what Trump said. His EO said nothing about Muslims, so it wasn't a Muslim ban.
Ok, show me his post where he claimed that your party’s laws were not racist.Then why didn't you tell Bripat how wrong he is.Pretty sure those Dimwinger laws were racist.I presume you hold the same view of the Jim Crow laws. That they didn't discriminate either.
It doesn't matter what Trump said. His EO said nothing about Muslims, so it wasn't a Muslim ban.
Jim Crow is to race, as Trumps EO is to religion.
Of course they discriminated, you dumbfuck. The law said blacks had to use certain fountains and restrooms. Trump's EO didn't mention Muslims. Of course, it would have been perfectly legal even if it did.It doesn't matter what Trump said. His EO said nothing about Muslims, so it wasn't a Muslim ban.
I presume you hold the same view of the Jim Crow laws. That they didn't discriminate either.
Nope. Trump's EO doesn't mention religion. Furthermore, the president can exclude foreigners for any reason he likes.Then why didn't you tell Bripat how wrong he is.Pretty sure those Dimwinger laws were racist.I presume you hold the same view of the Jim Crow laws. That they didn't discriminate either.
It doesn't matter what Trump said. His EO said nothing about Muslims, so it wasn't a Muslim ban.
Jim Crow is to race, as Trumps EO is to religion.
Original intent applies to the Constitution. You're assumptions about Trump's intent are nothing buy your worthless opinion.Are you abandoning the conservative judicial view of "original intent"?It doesn't matter what Trump said. His EO said nothing about Muslims, so it wasn't a Muslim ban.
That the actual language of a law (texturalism) , should override the original intent of the law?
I do have a problem with racism. Religious discrimination against Americans is also against the law. However, religious discrimination against foreigners is perfectly legal. Try actually reading the Constitution for once.I have no problem with keep Muslims out of this country. They are the scum of humanity. Anyone who believes in the abracadabra that they swear by is mentally defective.
You just go on to prove what I said. You have no problem with religious discrimination or racism.
You also show you have no problem with religious discrimination or racism.
Since when are Moslems a race?