Bill Maher: New Rules for Teabaggers

[boedicca]

At least he's consistently idiotic. He does deserve recognition for that.

 

[Si modo]

At least he's consistently idiotic. He does deserve recognition for that.

Yes, but I'm avoiding him, doncha know.

 

[JakeStarkey]

At least he's consistently idiotic. He does deserve recognition for that.

Yes, but I'm avoiding him, doncha know.

si got his ass kicked, and now he can slouch on out. The slob lies like Stephanie.

 

[boedicca]

Only in your anti-logic Universe bub.

All drsmith did was repeat the same nonsense over and over and over again until it became just too dang dull to warrant a response. That's not victory.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Only in your anti-logic Universe bub.

All drsmith did was repeat the same nonsense over and over and over again until it became just too dang dull to warrant a response. That's not victory.

boedicca you have earlier been caught in falsehoods, so your endorsement is squashed. You can get in step with si and stephanie.

 

[Si modo]

At least he's consistently idiotic. He does deserve recognition for that.

Yes, but I'm avoiding him, doncha know.

si got his ass kicked, and now he can slouch on out. The slob lies like Stephanie.

Strawmen always kick my ass. They are so cool that way.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yeah, si, lies do that to you.

 

[Si modo]

Yeah, si, lies do that to you.

 

[drsmith1072]

Although I do usually just scroll past your posts, the fact that I am still posting in this thread several days after the debate came and went, indicates (at least to those with two brain cells to rub together) that I have no intention of going anywhere. I know you WISH I and others would go away. We just don't seem to be going anywhere.

More avoidance from you, imagine that.
It should be easy. I am not asking you to prove a negative and IF you could prove your claim, you could do it easily by looking back into this thread and showing when and where someone made that timeline argument concerning when obama used the word "tea-baggers" inreferense to when he called for civility and you would actually prove your argument.

You made the claim how about you PROVE IT and stop running away

However, you and I both know that you can't which is why you are still avoiding doing so.

BTW IF you usually just scroll past my thread then how can you say my arguments are parroted?? Kind of shot your own spin in the foot there moron. LOL

P.S. it's sad that i have to explain this to you but "running away" is used to describe how YOU continue to avoid debates that you know you are going to lose. I actually wish that you and others had the ability to debate a topic but as usual all you have to offer are avoidance and personal attacks.

oh well it's time to go but I will be back tomorrow to watch you spin and squirm some more. LOL

See, more idiotic insanity from you. What the fuck do your delusions allow you to think 'my claim' is?

Idiot.

WOW so more avoidance from you. imagine that.

I really wish you were inteligent enough to follow along. However, since you are NOT i will spell it out for you in the hopes that even someone as SLOW as you can keep up.

post # 655 you made the following claim

Although I hate to burst your delusional little bubble, you didn't prove a thing. Others did last week and you parroted them.

But, we DO know that you can quote others who made a point last week. Obviously, simple mimicking gives you some sense of accomplishment.

Which was in reference to the time line argument "I" made concerning when obama used the term "tea-bagger" (2009) in reference to when he called for civility (2010).

So I asked you to prove YOUR claim and then you started your standard attack and avoidance tactics instead of trying to prove a claim that you know that you can't.

So once again, can you prove your claim or will you continue to spin and run away because you know that you can't?

 

[Si modo]

More avoidance from you, imagine that.
It should be easy. I am not asking you to prove a negative and IF you could prove your claim, you could do it easily by looking back into this thread and showing when and where someone made that timeline argument concerning when obama used the word "tea-baggers" inreferense to when he called for civility and you would actually prove your argument.

You made the claim how about you PROVE IT and stop running away

However, you and I both know that you can't which is why you are still avoiding doing so.

BTW IF you usually just scroll past my thread then how can you say my arguments are parroted?? Kind of shot your own spin in the foot there moron. LOL

P.S. it's sad that i have to explain this to you but "running away" is used to describe how YOU continue to avoid debates that you know you are going to lose. I actually wish that you and others had the ability to debate a topic but as usual all you have to offer are avoidance and personal attacks.

oh well it's time to go but I will be back tomorrow to watch you spin and squirm some more. LOL

See, more idiotic insanity from you. What the fuck do your delusions allow you to think 'my claim' is?

Idiot.

WOW so more avoidance from you. imagine that.

I really wish you were inteligent enough to follow along. However, since you are NOT i will spell it out for you in the hopes that even someone as SLOW as you can keep up.

post # 655 you made the following claim

Although I hate to burst your delusional little bubble, you didn't prove a thing. Others did last week and you parroted them.

But, we DO know that you can quote others who made a point last week. Obviously, simple mimicking gives you some sense of accomplishment.

Which was in reference to the time line argument "I" made concerning when obama used the term "tea-bagger" (2009) in reference to when he called for civility (2010).

So I asked you to prove YOUR claim and then you started your standard attack and avoidance tactics instead of trying to prove a claim that you know that you can't.

So once again, can you prove your claim or will you continue to spin and run away because you know that you can't?

If I quoted your posts showing you are nothing but a parrot, that would be a waste of my time. Your parroting posts are there for all to see, Johnny-come-lately.

Do you have a point? Or are you just parroting others' posts, AGAIN?

 

[drsmith1072]

At least he's consistently idiotic. He does deserve recognition for that.

And then come the group attacks, because they can't debate the facts they resort to personal attacks in lieu of a real argument.

How typical.

 

[drsmith1072]

See, more idiotic insanity from you. What the fuck do your delusions allow you to think 'my claim' is?

Idiot.

WOW so more avoidance from you. imagine that.

I really wish you were inteligent enough to follow along. However, since you are NOT i will spell it out for you in the hopes that even someone as SLOW as you can keep up.

post # 655 you made the following claim

Although I hate to burst your delusional little bubble, you didn't prove a thing. Others did last week and you parroted them.

But, we DO know that you can quote others who made a point last week. Obviously, simple mimicking gives you some sense of accomplishment.

Which was in reference to the time line argument "I" made concerning when obama used the term "tea-bagger" (2009) in reference to when he called for civility (2010).

So I asked you to prove YOUR claim and then you started your standard attack and avoidance tactics instead of trying to prove a claim that you know that you can't.

So once again, can you prove your claim or will you continue to spin and run away because you know that you can't?

If I quoted your posts showing you are nothing but a parrot, that would be a waste of my time. Your parroting posts are there for all to see, Johnny-come-lately.

Do you have a point? Or are you just parroting others' posts, AGAIN?

HAHA how typical.

YOU made a claim and then when asked to prove it you run away from doing so because you know that you can't prove it. First you hide behind "you can't prove a negative" and then you hide behind other lame excuses. Face it, you've got nothing.

If you showed where I parroted the timeline argument that I am referring to then you would prove that I parroted it and i would admit I was wrong. However, since being asked to substantiate your claim all you have done is try to avoid even attempting to prove your argument. You even went so far as to pretend that you didn't know what claim you were being asked to prove.

In the end, you got owned and have been busted for being nothing but a dishonest hack several times in this thread. You have ZERO credibiltiy and only continue to dig your hole deeper and deeper. LOL

 

[Si modo]

WOW so more avoidance from you. imagine that.

I really wish you were inteligent enough to follow along. However, since you are NOT i will spell it out for you in the hopes that even someone as SLOW as you can keep up.

post # 655 you made the following claim



Which was in reference to the time line argument "I" made concerning when obama used the term "tea-bagger" (2009) in reference to when he called for civility (2010).

So I asked you to prove YOUR claim and then you started your standard attack and avoidance tactics instead of trying to prove a claim that you know that you can't.

So once again, can you prove your claim or will you continue to spin and run away because you know that you can't?

If I quoted your posts showing you are nothing but a parrot, that would be a waste of my time. Your parroting posts are there for all to see, Johnny-come-lately.

Do you have a point? Or are you just parroting others' posts, AGAIN?

HAHA how typical.

YOU made a claim and then when asked to prove it you run away from doing so because you know that you can't prove it. First you hide behind "you can't prove a negative" and then you hide behind other lame excuses. Face it, you've got nothing.

If you showed where I parroted the timeline argument that I am referring to then you would prove that I parroted it and i would admit I was wrong. However, since being asked to substantiate your claim all you have done is try to avoid even attempting to prove your argument. You even went so far as to pretend that you didn't know what claim you were being asked to prove.

In the end, you got owned and have been busted for being nothing but a dishonest hack several times in this thread. You have ZERO credibiltiy and only continue to dig your hole deeper and deeper. LOL

Do you have ANYTHING original and/or of significance to add to a debate that took place last week?

Anything?

Anything at all?

 

[drsmith1072]

If I quoted your posts showing you are nothing but a parrot, that would be a waste of my time. Your parroting posts are there for all to see, Johnny-come-lately.

Do you have a point? Or are you just parroting others' posts, AGAIN?

HAHA how typical.

YOU made a claim and then when asked to prove it you run away from doing so because you know that you can't prove it. First you hide behind "you can't prove a negative" and then you hide behind other lame excuses. Face it, you've got nothing.

If you showed where I parroted the timeline argument that I am referring to then you would prove that I parroted it and i would admit I was wrong. However, since being asked to substantiate your claim all you have done is try to avoid even attempting to prove your argument. You even went so far as to pretend that you didn't know what claim you were being asked to prove.

In the end, you got owned and have been busted for being nothing but a dishonest hack several times in this thread. You have ZERO credibiltiy and only continue to dig your hole deeper and deeper. LOL

Do you have ANYTHING original and/or of significance to add to a debate that took place last week?

Anything?

Anything at all?

YES I have added items of both original and of significance to the debate and out of desperation to avoid a debate you know that you are going to lose you are trying to claim I parroted it when I did NOT. The only poster to respond to that debate was Murf after it caused him to change his argument as he NOW tries to claim that it doesn't matter that the two comments are not linked the way the author of the OP suggested and many righties agreed with.

You made the claim that I parroted it, PROVE IT.

It's really simple, PUT UP OR SHUT UP. LOL

The FACT that you continue to run away from proving your claim shows that you know that you can't. YOU LOSE. However, you are more than welcome to continue spinning, your squirming to avoid admitting that you are WRONG is quite entertaining. LOL

 

[Si modo]

HAHA how typical.

YOU made a claim and then when asked to prove it you run away from doing so because you know that you can't prove it. First you hide behind "you can't prove a negative" and then you hide behind other lame excuses. Face it, you've got nothing.

If you showed where I parroted the timeline argument that I am referring to then you would prove that I parroted it and i would admit I was wrong. However, since being asked to substantiate your claim all you have done is try to avoid even attempting to prove your argument. You even went so far as to pretend that you didn't know what claim you were being asked to prove.

In the end, you got owned and have been busted for being nothing but a dishonest hack several times in this thread. You have ZERO credibiltiy and only continue to dig your hole deeper and deeper. LOL

Do you have ANYTHING original and/or of significance to add to a debate that took place last week?

Anything?

Anything at all?

YES I have added both original and of significance items to the debate and out of desperation to avoid a debate you know that you are going to lose you are trying to claim I parroted it when I did NOT. The only poster to respond to that debate was Murf after it caused him to change his argument as he NOW tries to claim that it doesn't matter that the two comments are not linked the way the author of the OP suggested and many righties agreed with.

You made the claim that I parroted it, PROVE IT.

It's really simple, PUT UP OR SHUT UP. LOL

The FACT that you continue to run away from proving your claim shows that you know that you can't. YOU LOSE. However, you are more than welcome to continue spinning, your squirming to avoid admitting that you are WRONG is quite entertaining. LOL

What the fuck is your point, moron?

Make it.

Try to be significant to a debate that happened LAST WEEK when (or IF) you make one.

 

[drsmith1072]

Do you have ANYTHING original and/or of significance to add to a debate that took place last week?

Anything?

Anything at all?

YES I have added both original and of significance items to the debate and out of desperation to avoid a debate you know that you are going to lose you are trying to claim I parroted it when I did NOT. The only poster to respond to that debate was Murf after it caused him to change his argument as he NOW tries to claim that it doesn't matter that the two comments are not linked the way the author of the OP suggested and many righties agreed with.

You made the claim that I parroted it, PROVE IT.

It's really simple, PUT UP OR SHUT UP. LOL

The FACT that you continue to run away from proving your claim shows that you know that you can't. YOU LOSE. However, you are more than welcome to continue spinning, your squirming to avoid admitting that you are WRONG is quite entertaining. LOL

What the fuck is your point, moron?

Make it.

Try to be significant to a debate that happened LAST WEEK when (or IF) you make one.

I made my point which is why murf tried to change the argument. Your problem is that you have zero integrity and can't be honest enough to admit that FACT and you can't stop trolling and attacking me as you avoid the FACT that you have been proven to be dishonest on several occasions throughout this thread.

Your latest LIE is that I parroted the argument concerning when obama actually said "tea-bagger" compared to when he called for civility. Once again YOU made a claim you can't prove which shows you to be a LIAR.

Thanks for trolling have a nice day loser. LOL

 

[Murf76]

I made my point which is why murf tried to change the argument. Your problem is that you have zero integrity and can't be honest enough to admit that FACT and you can't stop trolling and attacking me as you avoid the FACT that you have been proven to be dishonest on several occasions throughout this thread.

Your latest LIE is that I parroted the argument concerning when obama actually said "tea-bagger" compared to when he called for civility. Once again YOU made a claim you can't prove which shows you to be a LIAR.

Thanks for trolling have a nice day loser. LOL

Murf didn't try to "change the argument.
Murf said outright and straight up that your "point" is pointless.

It doesn't matter when Obama used a pornagraphic and utterly inappropriate epithet to describe concerned American citizens. He's still a giant hypocrite for doing it.

The adolescent preoccupation with the word "teabagger" is one thing, when it comes from actual adolescents. It's something entirely different when it's the President of the United States.

Now, this guy has been nattering on about "civility" since he started taking flak. It's easy enough to find plenty of examples of it on the web if you bother to look. Here's one such, article dated January 20, 2009. Bear in mind that his "teabagger" quote was from November 30, 2009.

He called on the crowd to "rededicate ourselves to fulfilling the sacred charge the American people have given to us. I'd like all of us to come together with a sense of purpose and civility and urgency."

(more...)
CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive - Obama calls on lawmakers to join in ‘civility and urgency’ - Blogs from CNN.com

Hell, even Warren's prayer at his inauguration called for "civility". It's a word that Obama, himself, has used frequently. So, it didn't matter if the original article said that the book had been released "just three days after Obama's call for civility". It's been an ongoing situation in which Obama has consistently set one standard for himself and his administration, and another for his critics. Or have we forgotten him snickering like a 10 year-old as he intimated that Sarah Palin was pig in lipstick way back during the campaign?

The issue isn't timing. It's that the guy is a total hypocrite, utterly lacking in self-control.

 

[boedicca]

And now The One has told Rush Limbaugh to "play with himself".

How classy!

 

[Stephanie]

And now The One has told Rush Limbaugh to "play with himself".

How classy!

that is their idea of "being civil".
and class and Obama don't even go together, the guy is a thug, nothing more.

 

[Sherry]

And now The One has told Rush Limbaugh to "play with himself".

How classy!