EdwardBaiamonte
Platinum Member
- Nov 23, 2011
- 34,612
- 2,153
Those are lies.
Mr berg ran out of arguments and abandoned his own thread!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Those are lies.
maybe given a little more time the missing report, the 302 report can be found. That’s the one on which the whole case against Flynn is predicated. And maybe the disappeared agent who wrote the report while attending the meeting can be located."It is unclear whether Sullivan publicly laid out this guidance because he anticipated outside parties would want to file amicus briefs, because he wanted to encourage the filing of amicus briefs or because someone had already tried to file an amicus brief. (CNN noted earlier Tuesday that there is a docket entry in the Flynn case for which the underlying filing has not been made public.)
But regardless, the order suggests that Sullivan is not going to be wrapping up the case up ASAP, as he intends to provide an opportunity for the filing of friend-of-the-court briefs."
![]()
It Doesn’t Sound Like Flynn’s Judge Is Done With His Case Just Yet
After days of silence, the federal judge overseeing Michael Flynn's criminal case made his first public move since the Justice Department announced its controversial request to drop the prosecution. U.talkingpointsmemo.com
His order cited other cases addressing the submission of friend-of-the-court briefs. One he quoted said amicus briefs can be allowed when a party has not been adequately represented, when there is another case that could be affected by the one before the judge, or when the amicus “has unique information or perspective that can help the court beyond the help that the lawyers for the parties are able to provide. “
what if he played for Duke LaCrosse?Only criminal think pointing out justice department corruption is a bad thing.TDS thread 1,516
Are you a criminal?
It's not missing.maybe given a little more time the missing report, the 302 report can be found.
It's not missing.maybe given a little more time the missing report, the 302 report can be found.
![]()
Flynn Redux: What Those FBI Documents Really Show
A lot of people seem to be expecting Michael Flynn's sudden vindication. They should take a deep breath.www.lawfareblog.com
It appears the DOJ admitted in their surreply that the original 302 report by Strzok was lost or went missing.It's not missing.maybe given a little more time the missing report, the 302 report can be found.
![]()
Flynn Redux: What Those FBI Documents Really Show
A lot of people seem to be expecting Michael Flynn's sudden vindication. They should take a deep breath.www.lawfareblog.com
it’s not
Rep. Devin Nunes, ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday that the original documents summarizing the FBI interview where Micahel Flynn is alleged to have perjured himself are "missing."
"The original report that was used to brief the United States Congress, that report is missing. It's gone, poof, we can't find it," Nunes told Fox Business anchor Maria Bartiromo on Fox News's Sunday Morning Futures.
It's not the first time Nunes lied.Rep. Devin Nunes, ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday that the original documents summarizing the FBI interview where Micahel Flynn is alleged to have perjured himself are "missing."
Your lie is based on a lie coming from the Liar-in-Chief.It appears the DOJ admitted in their surreply that the original 302 report by Strzok was lost or went missing.
Here the DOJ argues that “even if the original STILL existed” meaning THE ORIGINAL 302 IS MISSING!
So then fool why not show us a copy of the original F 302 ????????????????? Tell us why Struck and love bird Page doctored it despite being rabid mad dog bigots, and despite it never having been done before. Show us interview with disappeared author of orginal F 302.It's not the first time Nunes lied.Rep. Devin Nunes, ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said Sunday that the original documents summarizing the FBI interview where Micahel Flynn is alleged to have perjured himself are "missing."
Your lie is based on a lie coming from the Liar-in-Chief.
we don’t just run out and charge someone based on a single piece of intelligence. We use intelligence as the basis for investigation."
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The notoriously independent-minded federal judge who once said he was disgusted by the conduct of Michael Flynn could block the administration’s bid to drop criminal charges against the former adviser to President Donald Trump, legal experts said.
The Department of Justice on Thursday told U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan in Washington it wants to drop the case against Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser, following a pressure campaign by the Republican president and his political allies.
While judges typically sign off on such motions, Sullivan could refuse and instead demand answers from the DOJ about who requested the sudden about-face, said Seth Waxman, a former federal prosecutor now at the law firm Dickinson Wright.
“If Judge Sullivan wanted to he could conduct an inquiry and start asking a lot of questions,” said Waxman.
![]()
Skeptical judge could hold up Trump administration's bid to clear Flynn, legal experts say
The notoriously independent-minded federal judge who once said he was disgusted by the conduct of Michael Flynn could block the administration's bid to drop criminal charges against the former adviser to President Donald Trump, legal experts said.www.reuters.com
Presumably, Judge Sullivan is intimately familiar with these facts.
![]()
Flynn Redux: What Those FBI Documents Really Show
A lot of people seem to be expecting Michael Flynn's sudden vindication. They should take a deep breath.www.lawfareblog.com
"The president may well pardon Flynn, as he has long hinted. It’s possible—though for reasons we’ll explain, we think unlikely—that Judge Emmet G. Sullivan will allow Flynn to withdraw his plea. And it’s possible as well that Attorney General William Barr, who has already intervened in the case once before and has asked a U.S. attorney to review its handling, will intervene once again on Flynn’s behalf. (how prescient was that!!)
So far, however, nothing has emerged that remotely clears Flynn; nothing has emerged that would require Sullivan to allow him to withdraw his plea; and nothing has emerged that would justify the Justice Department’s backing off of the case—or prosecuting it aggressively if Flynn were somehow allowed out of the very generous deal Special Counsel Robert Mueller cut him."
...................................................................................................................................................
Facts which expose Barr's attempt to get another Trump crony off the hook for a crime he committed much more difficult to pull off than it is to convince Trumpleheads. Folks who are eager and willing to swallow all the horseshit the Trump admin can shovel their way.
You're a fucking idiot. The DOJ said there was no legit reason to question Flynn in the first place, talking to foreigners was part of his job.
You're a fucking idiot. The DOJ said there was no legit reason to question Flynn in the first place, talking to foreigners was part of his job.
Exactly, and encouraging foreigners not to retaliate against us is doing a good job and yet TDS made Obama Comey see evil in it? Suppose Flynn had been neutral or encouraged Russia to retaliate against us. Would Obama Comey have liked that or arrested him for that too?
And, there was no legit reason to interview Flynn. Investigation was over and found absolutely nothing. But TDS caused 3 bigots at FBI to arrest Flynn for wanting reset with Russia exactly like Hillary had wanted with her famous Russian reset button when she came into office.
The judge has already ruled on Flynn's lawyer's baseless claim of misconduct.wrong fool!!! coming from FBI who says originally f 302 is, oddly, missing. First one in FBI history to go missing. Can Mr Berg tell us why that happened??