Blacks .. Still Chumps of the Democratic Party..

[TyroneSlothrop]

Republicans "Chumps for Billionaires"

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

My goodness, some folks put an amazing amount of effort into being absolutely as nasty as they possibly can.

.

If you title a thread :
Blacks .. Still Chumps of the Democratic Party..

this is what happens if a liberal sees it

 

[rdean]

I actually love these hilarious delusional posts. Because the GOP is 90% white and constantly screw over their ignorant and uneducated base, Republicans think that's just how politics is. Their tiny minds can't grasp the idea that blacks are both an important part of the Democratic coalition and their own people within that party. They just don't get it. There is no party line like there is within the GOP. No litmus test.

The GOP base is so ignorant and brainwashed, the fools and tools actually cheer when their leadership says they want to cut health care and that government shouldn't be helping the people who vote. You can't get anymore ignorant than people who think education is for snobs and unneeded. And yet, that's the GOP. They want to abolish the EPA so they can live in filth. Their ignorance leads them to believe the people they attack should come and be abused like the GOP does their own base. Could you be any more stupid?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

This article is well worth the read ..(A Short History of Democrats Republicans and Racism)

View attachment 40157

Hey Matthew, Steve_McGarrett, Silhouette, Publius1787, NLT, Porker, mudwhistle, S.J., Meathead, MaryAnne, GHook93, Pete7469, Tank, novasteve, Where_r_my_Keys, etc.....

...please explain to Lumpy why black people don't vote for the socially conservative republican party.

The same reason you don't... Accountability.

We judge you.

Of course, our parents to come in twos... Our kids graduate high school and most go to college and usually do quite well for themselves. Naturally if wouldn't be a rule, if there weren't exceptions... But hey! That's nature's way, right?

Perfection is, after all, a journey. Not a destination.

And the odds of ever getting anywhere close, depend's entirely upon one's journey being headed in that direction.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Tax Cuts For the Rich Made Kansas Broke — So Now Republicans Move to Raise Taxes on the poor

 

[NLT]

No matter how poorly served blacks are by the Democrats, they won't listen to what Republicans have to say with an open mind because they're falsely convinced by the Democratic party that Republicans hate them.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

No matter how poorly served blacks are by the Democrats, they won't listen to what Republicans have to say with an open mind because they're falsely convinced by the Democratic party that Republicans hate them.

Scalise third ranking Republican in Congress..any questions ?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[NLT]

Any questions? tyronecumslobber

 

[hazlnut]

This article is well worth the read ..(A Short History of Democrats Republicans and Racism)

View attachment 40157

Another race baiting thread from a bigot troll.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Any questions? .......

What Party was the President who signed the Civil Rights Act....?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[Pogo]

Any questions? tyronecumslobber

Yeah I gots a question: why are you so easily led by the nose? That must get you in trouble.

I gots an answer too:

The original House version:

• Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
• >>> ALL SOUTHERNERS: 7-97 (6.7%--93.3%)

• Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94 – 6%)
• Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85 – 15%)
• >>> ALL NORTHERNERS: 283-33 (89.6%--11.4%)

The Senate version:

• Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%)
• Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%)
• Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)
• ALL SOUTHERNERS: 1--21 (4.5%--95.5%)
• ALL NORTHERNERS: 72--6 (92.3%--7.7%)

Yes, there is a party pattern in that each line shows more support from the D side than the R side. But again, 94 versus 85 on one side is not significant.

But 96 on one side versus 92 on the other side?? You just hit the motherlode. NOW you can cite chew some polarization. BIG time.

The numbers don't lie; your pattern is clearly there but it's regional, not political. And regional, once again for you slow readers who can't think of a point on your own and crutch on Googly Image Bullshit, means cultural.

You take the numbers from the North -- both Dems and Repubs are for it.
You take the numbers from the South -- both Dems and Repubs are agin' it.
It's truly bipartisan in both directions. (!)

And to think people bitch about "gridlock".

Canard obliterated.

And one might add, immediately after that law went up Strom Thurmond did what was for 99 years unthinkable and switched from a Democrat to a Republican, followed, once that ceiling had been broken, by a cast of thousands. For 99 years associating with the party of Lincoln had been unthinkable whether you were a racist or not, but the hyperconservatives in the South finally decided to stop bickering with the Democratic party and splintering off into their own new parties (like they did in 1948 and in 1860) and join an established one that was intentionally baiting them with religious pandermonium. Which, being not all that smart, they bought hook, line and sinker.

 

[Publius1787]

This article is well worth the read ..(A Short History of Democrats Republicans and Racism)

View attachment 40157

Hey Matthew, Steve_McGarrett, Silhouette, Publius1787, NLT, Porker, mudwhistle, S.J., Meathead, MaryAnne, GHook93, Pete7469, Tank, novasteve, Where_r_my_Keys, etc.....

...please explain to Lumpy why black people don't vote for the socially conservative republican party.

See below.

 

[Pogo]

Perhaps our resident conservatives will tell us again how they 'support sending the Negro back to their native lands'.

Sure hope black folks can't crack their amazingly difficult 'code'.

The Democratic Party sponsored KKK used to torture and hang Blacks, I don't believe you would do the same but you don't mind race baiting obviously.

Not lately.

I guess you didn't notice..

There's a reason David Duke switched from democrat to republican. The republican values more closely aligned with his than democrats did.

I guess you didn't notice.

David Duke certainly doesn't represent me or the majority of conservatives, (your 2nd race baiting lie.)

Now if you could actually prove your statement I'd be willing to read it...

And yet you just trotted out this "Democratic Party sponsored KKK" song and dance?

Having it both ways: priceless.

The KKK has never been "sponsored" by anything outside its own membership. Nor was it ever founded by politics. It was founded by six bored college-age Confederate veterans on Christmas Day of 1865. This is why it came up with the humorous alliteration schemes of "klaverns" and "kleagles" and the whole Greek mythology reference -- the whole thing was a joke, a lark by bored young men in a small town. It wasn't even founded for terrorism.

What was also going on at the time was mass persecution of newly-freed Africans... lynchings, rapes, burning, even being skinned... for the crimes of asking for a fair wage or daring to walk into town. This became organized into vigilante terrorism groups such as the White League and the Knights of the White Camelllia, inevitably by Confederate war veterans, for the purpose of insurrection against "carpetbaggers", Northerners and Republicans (overlapping terms), to prevent emancipation from taking hold, and in effect to continue the War. Into this prank KKK group came this element, seeking an organization as a vehicle. Having no specific original purpose other than as a joke, the KKK was quickly taken over by that element.

To that quest for legitimacy the KKK recruited Nathan Bedford Forrest, a noteworthy Civil War general (again, not a politician) to be its figurehead (1867), and thereby grow its membership base. But the aforementioned element got so out of hand that less than two years later, even Forrest -- who had himself been a slave trader and heavily implicated in a racial massacre during the war -- decided it was over the top, disbanded the KKK in January of 1869, and dissassociated himself, even denying ever having been part of it.

That didn't stop the Element, who went on with the name and trappings and without a figurehead which simply further demonstrates it as a cultural movement rather than an organized or political one) and continued their murderous rampage for another decade until they were exterminated by the end of the 1870s.

That would have been it for the Klan, and it would have been relegated to the obscurity of history along with the Knights of the White Camellia, had it not been for William Simmons. Simmons RE-started the Klan, the version we're more familiar with in our time, exactly one hundred years ago after viewing some liberal Hollywood crap called "Birth of a Nation". Simmons was an inveterate club-joiner and salesman -- and once again, not a politician. He brought in the whole burning cross thing (taken directly from the film) consecrating the group with a fiery cross atop Stone Mountain in Georgia, and expanded the KKK mission to not just the racial/cultural interests of the South but a Morality Police raging against foreigners (xenophobia being big at the time along with racism) as well as Jews, Catholics, communists, adulterers and loose women.

He also brought in PR personnel to spread the Klan gospel nationwide, making deep inroads into the midwest and west, especially Indiana and Colorado, where it got Senators and Governors elected to office (Republicans btw) in its first forays into actual political campaigning. It also disrupted the 1924 Democratic convention, working to put down an Alabama Senator candidate who had denounced the KKK and railing against Al Smith because he was a Catholic.

That KKK political push peaked fortunately after the 1920s and by World War II the KKK was dead again. Until another assclown, who I apologize, can't think of his name off the top of my head, re-restarted the Klan in the late 1940s and stirred the shit for a few years until happily, he dropped dead of a heart attack and went to hell.

He wasn't a politician either.

The Klan has always been a far-right cultural vigilante group. Its only interests in politics have been as an avenue to that cultural agenda, and to that end it worked with Democrats or Republicans, whichever worked at that time in that place.

So much for your bullshit link, Lumps.

 

[rightwinger]

Maybe if Republicans can just point out to blacks all that they have done for them

 

[danielpalos]

This article is well worth the read ..(A Short History of Democrats Republicans and Racism)

View attachment 40157

I think blacks should consult with Black Foots on political strategy and gambits, for their Cause.