Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Horseshit! Your OP alleges that the "Republican Party is pushing for an authoritarian Nationalist Theocracy" because of something stupid Boebert said. You give absolutely no definitive exegesis as to what the Party's doctrine is or what it should be relative to the First Amendment.I'm merely observing the responses. Your approval of that is not required.
The pertinent video is at youtube: "Hitchens Eviscerates the Catholic Church" @ timepoint 6:25: ....'Concordat, the first treaty Hitler ever signed, giving the church a monopoly over education in Germany in exchange for the dissolution of the Catholic Center Party to give the Nazi Party a clear run.'Yeah... except that holy spirit part.
no, yoj are just burden shifting which is the favorite past time of tyrantsTis not the claim you made that I am talking about. Do try to keep up.
no, yoj are just burden shifting which is the favorite past time of tyrants
Give them credit: They're no longer even trying to hide it. And why should they? They know they have the Supreme Court in their pocket.
I'm not kidding when I say that the current incarnation of the Republican Party is pushing for an authoritarian Nationalist Theocracy.
"The Church is supposed to direct the government". Right, Republicans?
Horseshit! Your OP alleges that the "Republican Party is pushing for an authoritarian Nationalist Theocracy" because of something stupid Boebert said. You give absolutely no definitive exegesis as to what the Party's doctrine is or what it should be relative to the First Amendment.
I'm seeing many on the Right defending her, to one degree or another. That's all I was interested in.Horseshit! Your OP alleges that the "Republican Party is pushing for an authoritarian Nationalist Theocracy" because of something stupid Boebert said. You give absolutely no definitive exegesis as to what the Party's doctrine is or what it should be relative to the First Amendment.
The Nazi Dem puppet now in the White House is also a CIA puppet, so Nazi-Catholic Ukraine is definitely up for exegesis. The swastika itself is documented as having come from Ice Age Mezin, Ukraine. Hitler also knew about Mezin, because there are German documents to reinforce this claim, which we have already posted at USMB.Horseshit! Your OP alleges that the "Republican Party is pushing for an authoritarian Nationalist Theocracy" because of something stupid Boebert said. You give absolutely no definitive exegesis as to what the Party's doctrine is or what it should be relative to the First Amendment.
Link to you whacky source?The Nazi Dem puppet now in the White House is also a CIA puppet, so Nazi-Catholic Ukraine is definitely up for exegesis. The swastika itself is documented as having come from Ice Age Mezin, Ukraine. Hitler also knew about Mezin, because there are German documents to reinforce this claim, which we have already posted at USMB.
That's the most convoluted, indecipherable bullshit I've read in some time.POSSCOTUS has lost legitimacy.
'Robert Ingersoll: " They knew that to put God in the constitution was to put man out. They knew that the recognition of a Deity would be seized upon by fanatics and zealots as a pretext for destroying the liberty of thought. They knew the terrible history of the church too well to place in her keeping, or in the keeping of God, the sacred rights of man. They intended that all should have the right to worship, or not to worship; that our laws should make no distinction on account of creed. They intended to found and frame a government for man, and for man alone. They wished to preserve the individuality and liberty of all, to prevent the few from governing the many, and the many from persecuting and destroying the few."
....our Constitution's only reference to religion is exclusionary. It excludes the state from involving itself in religion (the First Amendment's "free exercise" clause) and excludes religion from involving itself in the state (The First Amendment's "establishment" clause....The separation of church and state was woven into the constitutional design even before the First Amendment was drafted....Divorcing religion from government offices was so important that the US Congress edited the word god out of its oath of office.'
(Seidel, The Founding Myth, pp. 32-3)
MAGA Media. This is the stuff these folks are fed 24/7/365.
Good luck with that, Correll. I've never been able to get a definitive exegesis of the doctrine of separation from a leftist. They always talk in slogans.That seems unlikely. I don't know anyone that supports that. And it has never been gop policy.
Everything I have ever heard or seem, indicates it is a fringe position.
Can you support your claim with...anything?
i’m not surprisedI kind of like that title...tyrant
Who knew I held so much power!
Thanks!
You're a ridiculous person who can't make up his mind from one day to the next about who the statists are in America. One day, it's lefty. The next day, it's conservatives. And all the while I seriously doubt you have the faintest clue what the historical doctrine of separation is per the Anglo-American tradition of natural law and classical liberalism.
Has government told you which church to attend?Your pathology is the false problem of the more and the less. More xians than non-xians is the contradiction that opposes the Constitution.
'First, our Constitution is deliberately godless. There are no references to gods, goddesses, or divine intervention. The omission was not an oversight. Supernatural power was rejected in favor of the natural power contained in the first three words: "We the People."
Robert Ingersoll: " They intended that all should have the right to worship or not to worship; that our laws make no distinction on account of creed. They intended to found and frame a government for man and man alone. They wished to preserve the individuality and liberty of all, to prevent the few from governing the many, and the many from persecuting and destroying the few." '
(Seidel, The Founding Myth)
Ol Mac1958 is a Tweener who in a moment of insanity voted for bidenYou're a ridiculous person who can't make up his mind from one day to the next about who the statists are in America. One day, it's lefty. The next day, it's conservatives. And all the while I seriously doubt you have the faintest clue what the historical doctrine of separation is per the Anglo-American tradition of natural law and classical liberalism.
"Statists" isn't even a term I use.You're a ridiculous person who can't make up his mind from one day to the next about who the statists are in America. One day, it's lefty. The next day, it's conservatives. And all the while I seriously doubt you have the faintest clue what the historical doctrine of separation is per the Anglo-American tradition of natural law and classical liberalism.
