Boehner just asked Obama to move his speech by one day

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Wow, nice response. The guy gives a well-reasoned opinion and you come back with insults and partisan jabs.

Nice hypocrisy. I've seen you do the same thing many times "tool"

And now you're doing it. Aren't you the asshole?

Without a doubt, I'm an asshole. I don't hide it or deny it. So what's your lame excuse?

 

[Conservative]

Obama was bitch slapped by Boehner. If his date selection was innocent, as his prevaricating mouthpieces insist, then he should have stuck to his guns. Instead he backed down. He looks weak.....as usual.

No, actually, he wasn't "bitch slapped". If anything, if this plays out right, which I think it will, it will be used to illustrate exactly what President Obama should have done in the first place, spot lighted the fact that the Republicans aren't interested in governing. They actually hate the government we have. And they are doing their very best to make it dysfunctional to prove that government doesn't work.

Along with so many other historic things this congress is pulling, like record low legislation, refusing to do anything to increase revenues to pay debt, a record on brinksmenship with the debt ceiling, calling the President a "liar" in the halls of congress, etc, they are showing that they are petulant, vulgar, arrogant, and obstructionist. This has never happened before, that a speaker denied a president a chance to speak before congress.

And it fits in nicely to that story..

Good going boys!

He was not denied a chance to speak before congress. He was required to chose an alternate date to speak before congress, you lying little dip shit.

 

[Sallow]

Obama show this brand of ideology during a Democrat debat no less. He was asked if it was discovered that raising taxes on the rich never increased revenue would he still do it. He said yes? They made fun of him, but the point was that regardless of the outcome his goal was raising taxes even if it didn't bring the desired results.

And what did GOP presidential hopefuls say at the last debate? When asked if they would accept 10 to 1 spending cuts to tax increases, every single one of them said they wouldn't. And what does that tell us? It tells us that the GOP is so blinded by this anti-tax ideology that they'd be willing to walk away from the deal of the century. I still believe that in reality, none of them would scoff at that deal, but they said it nonetheless.

It's insane to bargain with a dishonest broker.

It doesn't matter what Obama says his word is worthless as Boehner intimated with his Jello comment.

You've bought into this hogwash that higher taxes are good. 87% say otherwise when it means their taxes go up, and trust me, they will.

If you don't mind living on the edge of poverty while that prick lives off the gravy-train from now on then you should be happy. Your lot in life is not his concern. Never was.

Your low tax, low regulation countries are sprinkled all through the third world. You can visit one if you wish.

There isn't a prosperous country on the planet that uses that model.

 

[Sallow]

Obama was bitch slapped by Boehner. If his date selection was innocent, as his prevaricating mouthpieces insist, then he should have stuck to his guns. Instead he backed down. He looks weak.....as usual.

No, actually, he wasn't "bitch slapped". If anything, if this plays out right, which I think it will, it will be used to illustrate exactly what President Obama should have done in the first place, spot lighted the fact that the Republicans aren't interested in governing. They actually hate the government we have. And they are doing their very best to make it dysfunctional to prove that government doesn't work.

Along with so many other historic things this congress is pulling, like record low legislation, refusing to do anything to increase revenues to pay debt, a record on brinksmenship with the debt ceiling, calling the President a "liar" in the halls of congress, etc, they are showing that they are petulant, vulgar, arrogant, and obstructionist. This has never happened before, that a speaker denied a president a chance to speak before congress.

And it fits in nicely to that story..

Good going boys!

He was not denied a chance to speak before congress. He was required to chose an alternate date to speak before congress, you lying little dip shit.

Never been done before..shit dip.

 

[J.E.D]

Obama show this brand of ideology during a Democrat debat no less. He was asked if it was discovered that raising taxes on the rich never increased revenue would he still do it. He said yes? They made fun of him, but the point was that regardless of the outcome his goal was raising taxes even if it didn't bring the desired results.

And what did GOP presidential hopefuls say at the last debate? When asked if they would accept 10 to 1 spending cuts to tax increases, every single one of them said they wouldn't. And what does that tell us? It tells us that the GOP is so blinded by this anti-tax ideology that they'd be willing to walk away from the deal of the century. I still believe that in reality, none of them would scoff at that deal, but they said it nonetheless.

It's insane to bargain with a dishonest broker.

It doesn't matter what Obama says his word is worthless as Boehner intimated with his Jello comment.

You've bought into this hogwash that higher taxes are good. 87% say otherwise when it means their taxes go up, and trust me, they will.

If you don't mind living on the edge of poverty while that prick lives off the gravy-train from now on then you should be happy. Your lot in life is not his concern. Never was.

And a majority of that 87% will also tell you that they support raising taxes on the rich. You want to talk about the gravy train? It turns out that a lot of those corps that supposedly need lower taxes are paying their CEOs more than they paid in taxes. Wealth inequality in the US is growing steadily each year. Corporations are sitting on 2 trillion in cash. They have plenty of money. Why are they not hiring? Maybe it's because their customers have no money and can't afford to purchase their products or services. And what is the GOP's answer to this issue? Throw more money at corporations. More tax breaks for the wealthy while eliminating tax breaks for the working poor. Do you really think that's the answer? We have the lowest tax rates since the 50's. 10 years of the Bush tax cuts. Where are the jobs?

 

[J.E.D]

Nice hypocrisy. I've seen you do the same thing many times "tool"

And now you're doing it. Aren't you the asshole?

Without a doubt, I'm an asshole. I don't hide it or deny it. So what's your lame excuse?

I don't have an excuse. Now what?

 

[Sallow]

Obama was bitch slapped by Boehner. If his date selection was innocent, as his prevaricating mouthpieces insist, then he should have stuck to his guns. Instead he backed down. He looks weak.....as usual.

No, actually, he wasn't "bitch slapped". If anything, if this plays out right, which I think it will, it will be used to illustrate exactly what President Obama should have done in the first place, spot lighted the fact that the Republicans aren't interested in governing. They actually hate the government we have. And they are doing their very best to make it dysfunctional to prove that government doesn't work.

Along with so many other historic things this congress is pulling, like record low legislation, refusing to do anything to increase revenues to pay debt, a record on brinksmenship with the debt ceiling, calling the President a "liar" in the halls of congress, etc, they are showing that they are petulant, vulgar, arrogant, and obstructionist. This has never happened before, that a speaker denied a president a chance to speak before congress.

And it fits in nicely to that story..

Good going boys!

With the effort necessary to spin that much, Sallow has to be dizzy as hell.

Face reality. President Obama and his peeps chose the date IN ORDER to CONFLICT with the GOP festivities.

When he got called on it, he DID back down -- as he ought to have, since he never should have made that cheese-dick effort in the first place.

He has revealed that he is a small, petty, little man. Even so, he still gets some props for at least back-peddling enough to END UP doing the right thing.

I haved faced reality.

This is politics, dude. If you don't see what just happened..even after I explained what just happened..not much more I can do.

Obama is excellent at this sort of stuff. I hope everyone who is campaigning in the 2012 takes him as lightly as most of you do.

 

[Conservative]

No, actually, he wasn't "bitch slapped". If anything, if this plays out right, which I think it will, it will be used to illustrate exactly what President Obama should have done in the first place, spot lighted the fact that the Republicans aren't interested in governing. They actually hate the government we have. And they are doing their very best to make it dysfunctional to prove that government doesn't work.

Along with so many other historic things this congress is pulling, like record low legislation, refusing to do anything to increase revenues to pay debt, a record on brinksmenship with the debt ceiling, calling the President a "liar" in the halls of congress, etc, they are showing that they are petulant, vulgar, arrogant, and obstructionist. This has never happened before, that a speaker denied a president a chance to speak before congress.

And it fits in nicely to that story..

Good going boys!

He was not denied a chance to speak before congress. He was required to chose an alternate date to speak before congress, you lying little dip shit.

Never been done before..shit dip.

and it still hasn't, moron.

You said Obama was denied a chance to speak to congress. He was not. You're a liar. And a really bad one.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The jobs are busy right now. They're tied up with Obamas regulations.

Please leave a message after the elections, and they'll get right back to you.

 

[NoNukes]

Interesting indeed. What if Obama says no? Then he comes out looking like an ass for playing political games with US jobs as the game pieces.

You think it would hurt the speaker even though Obama has already waited a month to make his plan public?

No, I think it'll make Obama look bad for scheduling his speech on the same day as a GOP debate. Both sides claim the debate has nothing to do with it. Yeah, right. I think the Speaker comes out of this in good shape either way.

There are 20 debates, and Obama wanted to get started as soon as they came back from recess. What Boner did has never been done in history, and it was not necessary.

 

[Jarhead]

You think it would hurt the speaker even though Obama has already waited a month to make his plan public?

No, I think it'll make Obama look bad for scheduling his speech on the same day as a GOP debate. Both sides claim the debate has nothing to do with it. Yeah, right. I think the Speaker comes out of this in good shape either way.

There are 20 debates, and Obama wanted to get started as soon as they came back from recess. What Boner did has never been done in history, and it was not necessary.

And it couldnt wait until wednesday?
He felt the need to make a network change their schedule, an auditorium change their schedule, or some of the congresspeople not be present at his address?

Your bias is showing.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

And now you're doing it. Aren't you the asshole?

Without a doubt, I'm an asshole. I don't hide it or deny it. So what's your lame excuse?

I don't have an excuse. Now what?

Well that's entirely up to you.
When I realised Bush was hurting the country with his spending I stopped supporting him. Most of you lefties seem unwilling to admit any fault on Obamas watch. So if you choose to blindly follow him off the cliff that's your choice.
Personally I choose to fight back and demand better.

 

[mudwhistle]

And what did GOP presidential hopefuls say at the last debate? When asked if they would accept 10 to 1 spending cuts to tax increases, every single one of them said they wouldn't. And what does that tell us? It tells us that the GOP is so blinded by this anti-tax ideology that they'd be willing to walk away from the deal of the century. I still believe that in reality, none of them would scoff at that deal, but they said it nonetheless.

It's insane to bargain with a dishonest broker.

It doesn't matter what Obama says his word is worthless as Boehner intimated with his Jello comment.

You've bought into this hogwash that higher taxes are good. 87% say otherwise when it means their taxes go up, and trust me, they will.

If you don't mind living on the edge of poverty while that prick lives off the gravy-train from now on then you should be happy. Your lot in life is not his concern. Never was.

Your low tax, low regulation countries are sprinkled all through the third world. You can visit one if you wish.

There isn't a prosperous country on the planet that uses that model.

I live in one already.

Why don't you move to the UK. Get a taste of real socialism.

 

[J.E.D]

The jobs are busy right now. They're tied up with Obamas regulations.

Please leave a message after the elections, and they'll get right back to you.

Right. "Obama's regulations" are holding up the job market. Companies must have started firing in advance of those regulations since this all began in 2007. Who knew companies are also psychics? By the way, what are all of these "Obama regulations" that are keeping employers from hiring?

 

[Conservative]

You think it would hurt the speaker even though Obama has already waited a month to make his plan public?

No, I think it'll make Obama look bad for scheduling his speech on the same day as a GOP debate. Both sides claim the debate has nothing to do with it. Yeah, right. I think the Speaker comes out of this in good shape either way.

There are 20 debates, and Obama wanted to get started as soon as they came back from recess. What Boner did has never been done in history, and it was not necessary.

who are you? Sallow's sock puppet?

Obama was not denied a chance to speak to congress. He was bitch slapped into taking an alternate date because the one he 'just happened to pick out of thin air' was a problem.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The jobs are busy right now. They're tied up with Obamas regulations.

Please leave a message after the elections, and they'll get right back to you.

Right. "Obama's regulations" are holding up the job market. Companies must have started firing in advance of those regulations since this all began in 2007. Who knew companies are also psychics? By the way, what are all of these "Obama regulations" that are keeping employers from hiring?

Don't be a lazy lib. Google it yourself. I'll give you some keywords...

Healthcare
EPA
Dust
MPG

 

[J.E.D]

Without a doubt, I'm an asshole. I don't hide it or deny it. So what's your lame excuse?

I don't have an excuse. Now what?

Well that's entirely up to you.
When I realised Bush was hurting the country with his spending I stopped supporting him. Most of you lefties seem unwilling to admit any fault on Obamas watch. So if you choose to blindly follow him off the cliff that's your choice.
Personally I choose to fight back and demand better.

Well, that's your problem. You don't like Obama and think that he's the cause of all of our problems. I don't feel that way, but it doesn't mean that I worship the guy. I think you'd have an easier time if you stopped thinking that everybody should think like you, and that everybody who doesn't is wrong. And Obama doesn't control what legislation becomes law. The GOP is currently in control of the House of Reps. They've been in there since Jan and have yet to do anything about jobs. When are you going to demand action of them? They do have an obligation to govern. Part of good governance is the ability to cooperate.

 

[J.E.D]

The jobs are busy right now. They're tied up with Obamas regulations.

Please leave a message after the elections, and they'll get right back to you.

Right. "Obama's regulations" are holding up the job market. Companies must have started firing in advance of those regulations since this all began in 2007. Who knew companies are also psychics? By the way, what are all of these "Obama regulations" that are keeping employers from hiring?

Don't be a lazy lib. Google it yourself. I'll give you some keywords...

Healthcare
EPA
Dust
MPG

Most of the provisions of the ACA (health care) haven't even gone into effect. How is that holding up jobs?

Maybe some EPA regs are tough on companies, but how are they to blame for the poor economy?

Dust? Not sure what you're talking about there.

MPG? Requiring better MPG standards stifles job growth? Um....ok. How so?

 

[Conservative]

I don't have an excuse. Now what?

Well that's entirely up to you.
When I realised Bush was hurting the country with his spending I stopped supporting him. Most of you lefties seem unwilling to admit any fault on Obamas watch. So if you choose to blindly follow him off the cliff that's your choice.
Personally I choose to fight back and demand better.

Well, that's your problem. You don't like Obama and think that he's the cause of all of our problems. I don't feel that way, but it doesn't mean that I worship the guy. I think you'd have an easier time if you stopped thinking that everybody should think like you, and that everybody who doesn't is wrong. And Obama doesn't control what legislation becomes law. The GOP is currently in control of the House of Reps. They've been in there since Jan and have yet to do anything about jobs. When are you going to demand action of them? They do have an obligation to govern. Part of good governance is the ability to cooperate.

Obama has been in charge since January of 2009, as has done shit about jobs. You wanna whine like the little bitch you are about the GOP not doing anything since just this past January?

Imbecile.

 

[mudwhistle]

You think it would hurt the speaker even though Obama has already waited a month to make his plan public?

No, I think it'll make Obama look bad for scheduling his speech on the same day as a GOP debate. Both sides claim the debate has nothing to do with it. Yeah, right. I think the Speaker comes out of this in good shape either way.

There are 20 debates, and Obama wanted to get started as soon as they came back from recess. What Boner did has never been done in history, and it was not necessary.

I remember the days when the President only went in front of a joint session during national emergencies and the state of the union address. How many of these has he had so far?

What they've turned into is his own personal campaign speech and opportunities for him to act like he's better then everyone else. He's taken time to insult house leaders and Supreme Court Justices at these "address to the natiion" events.