Boots On The Ground, Or Not?

[g5000]

If we "wipe out ISIS", who do we leave in charge when we leave to prevent another terrorist organization from re-forming?

 

[g5000]

No boots until we have a President who is not a junior Jihadists

Obama has killed more Muslims than Bush.

That credit goes to the U.S. military...........

Nope. It is done at the direction of the Commander-in-Chief.

Try again.

They deserve all the credit.........................they fought it..........................

Your inability to give Obama credit for anything is ridiculous and pathological.

He's killed more Muslims than Bush and you fools don't want to admit it since it clashes with your retarded narrative that he's a Muslim jihadist.

 

[eagle1462010]

If we "wipe out ISIS", who do we leave in charge when we leave to prevent another terrorist organization from re-forming?

I say Assad...................Brutal dictator or not.......those types keep the lid on the dang thing..............They don't control the Radical element by being nice.

 

[eagle1462010]

No boots until we have a President who is not a junior Jihadists

Obama has killed more Muslims than Bush.

That credit goes to the U.S. military...........

Nope. It is done at the direction of the Commander-in-Chief.

Try again.

They deserve all the credit.........................they fought it..........................

Your inability to give Obama credit for anything is ridiculous and pathological.

I give the credit under Obama and Bush to the military..................period.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Obama has killed more Muslims than Bush.

That credit goes to the U.S. military...........

Nope. It is done at the direction of the Commander-in-Chief.

Try again.

They deserve all the credit.........................they fought it..........................

Your inability to give Obama credit for anything is ridiculous and pathological.

I give the credit under Obama and Bush to the military..................period.

After only a couple of years, Jr. said that he was no longer concerned about OBL, because he was probably in a cave somewhere....................



President Obama actually had the balls to call for the operation to take out OBL, even though there was only a 60 percent chance that he was where they thought he was.

Yes, the military carried out the operations as ordered, but it took balls to order the operations to happen in the first place.

Jr. never had the balls (or the interest) in getting OBL.

 

[Jarlaxle]

You won't win w/o boots on the ground. With that said if boots are on the ground don't handcuff them with ROE, turn them loose and ISIS will be annihilated

Blanket the entire area with nerve gas. No boots on the ground needed.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Nukes should NOT be dropped. We have enough conventional weapons that can eliminate targets almost as easy as a nuke, but without the dangerous radiation that nukes leave behind.

Nerve gas is better: no damage to infrastructure, no survivors, no radiation.

 

[Jarlaxle]

No boots on the ground as long as a Democrat is Commander in Chief.

What if ISIS attacks before January 2017?

Odds are they will.

Reduce Medina to a radioactive crater.

 

[Jarlaxle]

If we "wipe out ISIS", who do we leave in charge when we leave to prevent another terrorist organization from re-forming?

Nobody...leave no survivors, then simply go in and take the oil.

 

[Timmy]

Obama has killed more Muslims than Bush.

That credit goes to the U.S. military...........

Nope. It is done at the direction of the Commander-in-Chief.

Try again.

They deserve all the credit.........................they fought it..........................

Your inability to give Obama credit for anything is ridiculous and pathological.

I give the credit under Obama and Bush to the military..................period.

Do you give them then blame too?

 

[g5000]

Nukes should NOT be dropped. We have enough conventional weapons that can eliminate targets almost as easy as a nuke, but without the dangerous radiation that nukes leave behind.

Nerve gas is better: no damage to infrastructure, no survivors, no radiation.

So you want us to be war criminals.

 

[Jarlaxle]

I want them to be dead. I could give a shit what anyone else thinks. They should have been wiped out thirty years ago.

 

[Timmy]

No boots until we have a President who is not a junior Jihadists

Obama has killed more Muslims than Bush.

That credit goes to the U.S. military...........

Using that logic , Bin Ladin was innocent . Since HE didn't fly those planes into those buildings .

 

[Wildman]

i would support boots on ground only IF there are a 20 to 1 other troops from nations dedicated to defeat those filthy sons-of-SATAN!!

 

[Hancock]

No boots until we have a President who is not a junior Jihadists

Obama has killed more Muslims than Bush.

That credit goes to the U.S. military...........

Using that logic , Bin Ladin was innocent . Since HE didn't fly those planes into those buildings .

Similarities between Barry and Bin Laden, this could take awhile.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

 

[Avatar4321]

I'm against ground troops from the US right now. I'd much rather focus on domestic security. Such security includes boarder control, shutting off the valve of illegals, and deporting illegals who overstayed visas, focusing on those from higher threat areas as a priority.

We as a people aren't prepared for war. We need to get our house in order or we are in serious trouble.

France and Russia can peruse whatever interests they feel they need to peruse. Until they start a fight with us, I don't think we need to get involved.

Of course I know we are going to be no matter what is prudent.

 

[Avatar4321]

Doesn't really matter Obama has made it very clear he won't change his current ISIS strategery. There is really no point in putting in ground forces if your going to tie their hands.
It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.

He also said he had a red line that wouldn't be crossed without consequences. Obama lies like hell. Why should we trust Him when he says anything considering military strategy?

 

[The Rabbi]

No boots until we have a President who is not a junior Jihadists

Obama has killed more Muslims than Bush.

Bullshit.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Ask some people what they would do about ISIS, "Whatever Obama is doing, we're against that." Never an actual plan. Just a cowardly running away while throwing spitballs at what someone else is trying to do.

So let's strike while the Parisian iron is hot.

Should we send in the necessary ground troops to finish off ISIS, or not?

It is currently estimated it would take about 30,000 to 40,000 troops to do so.

Let's assume for the sake of argument no other country is going to send troops. It's obvious they are not going to. Maybe once we sent troops, they would join, but we cannot assume that.

So, no wiggling, no waffling bullshit about how Obama would never send troops. The question is, "SHOULD we?"

After a few weeks of round the clock bombardment by B-2s and B-52s carpet bombing ISIS-held positions, send in MASSIVE ground troops to mop up. Then have arab allies hold and occupy those positions. Rinse, repeat.

Nothing more than a political jerkfest right now with token bombings and 'advisors.' And the problem isn't getting fixed. So fix it. Fuck em up, bang their old ladies, and make their children cry.

 

[Claudette]

No boots on the ground! None.

Thank you for your response.

Follow-up question. If ISIS terrorists perpetrate an attack on US soil like the recent attack on Paris, would this change your answer?

Yes, then I say bomb them into the stone age.

Bingo.

Good answer and I agree 100%.