Boston bombing suspect charged, will not be treated as enemy combatant

[NoNukes]

How is one us citizen treated as a enemy combatant while another receives legal constitutional privileges?

Was Timothy McVeigh treated as an enemy combatant? Or do you have to be a Muslim?

 

[Mustang]

Boston bombing suspect charged, will not be treated as enemy combatant

Read more: Boston bombing suspect charged, will not be treated as enemy combatant | Fox News

will be tried in civilian courts...there you have it

This is going to piss off conservatives. It's constitutional.

 

[Interpol]

Anything he's said is inadmissible

Yep, he wasn't read his miranda rights.

The underwear bomber and the Times Square guy were also not read their Miranda Rights as well.

I'm okay with that in the "public safety exception" cases where the guilt of the accused is a foregone conclusion but authorities want to get information from the accused that could be useful to help in other investigations, say.

This is not a precedent, and in this case, it was useful because the kid can provide information about his brother more freely than had they mirandized him right away.

Now, to the conservatives here, I want to know why the lot of you want things both ways. You want him designated as an enemy combatant so that we can just behead him or some such thing, but then you jump on Obama for not mirandizing him. Which one is it? You can't have both.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Location, location, location.

That's not legal. They're both US citizens. So, we pick and choose whatever type of justice based on location?

It's sorta like this..

When you declare war on the US, go into hiding in a foreign country and continue plotting to destroy US citizens and property..you open yourself to the US defending itself. That even goes for folks who don't hide in foreign countries.

Like Boston. In case you didn't know this, one of those guys is dead..and the other one was gravely wounded. He took a bullet to the neck.

i agree with that....

 

[NoNukes]

OK, with that logic, the boston bombers brought the war zone here. Shouldn't they receive the same fate?

I don't know if I want the Military handling it, Nadal Hassan has been sitting around for how many years now and has not went to trial?

I'm not arguing for or against either, just how one receives a different type of justice than the other.

It was explained to you.

 

[NoNukes]

Anything he's said is inadmissible

Yep, he wasn't read his miranda rights.

They had 48 hours to question him without Miranda Rights, and it is admissible.

 

[JakeStarkey]

He won't be transferred to the military tribunal system unless it is proven that he had links to AQ or other terrorist organizations.

Since he is an American citizen, the crime was committed in Boston against other Americans, he will be charged and tried in the federal court system.

 

[Rocko]

How is one us citizen treated as a enemy combatant while another receives legal constitutional privileges?

Location, location, location.

I'm sure there's some kind of legal explanation for that reasoning, right?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No, honey that's not how it work's...was in response to a "they have 48 hours to question him" comment

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

 

[Rocko]

Anything he's said is inadmissible

Yep, he wasn't read his miranda rights.

Per the public safety exception, he doesn't get Miranda rights.(not that I agree with that)

So you agree with him having the right to remain silent while his buddies blow up more innocent people. Got it.

 

[g5000]

Boston bombing suspect charged, will not be treated as enemy combatant

Read more: Boston bombing suspect charged, will not be treated as enemy combatant | Fox News

will be tried in civilian courts...there you have it

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...-about-marathon-bombers-you-need-to-know.html

4. One of the differences between Bush's NDAA and Obama's NDAA is that under Obama's NDAA, the younger bomber cannot be sent to Gitmo and tried by a military tribunal as he could have been under Bush's NDAA. Since he is a US citizen, he must be tried as a criminal in a US court under Obama's NDAA.

 

[MarcATL]

How is one us citizen treated as a enemy combatant while another receives legal constitutional privileges?

Was Timothy McVeigh treated as an enemy combatant? Or do you have to be a Muslim?

Powerful!!!

 

[g5000]

That's not legal. They're both US citizens. So, we pick and choose whatever type of justice based on location?

Oh bullshit. You waltz into a war zone and collude with a declared enemy, shit happens.

OK, with that logic, the boston bombers brought the war zone here. Shouldn't they receive the same fate?

Are you really this obtuse and stupid?

 

[Rocko]

How is one us citizen treated as a enemy combatant while another receives legal constitutional privileges?

Was Timothy McVeigh treated as an enemy combatant? Or do you have to be a Muslim?

Powerful!!!

It was a different time. In the post 911 world McVeigh would have been initially treated as enemy combatant.

 

[g5000]

OK, with that logic, the boston bombers brought the war zone here. Shouldn't they receive the same fate?

I don't know if I want the Military handling it, Nadal Hassan has been sitting around for how many years now and has not went to trial?

I'm not arguing for or against either, just how one receives a different type of justice than the other.

Apples and organges, idiot. One was in Yemen. They don't have Boston police in Yemen. It is a military theater in a foreign country, not a police precinct.

Got it now?

Jesus H. Christ, there is a metric ton of dense heads around here.

 

[MarcATL]

Was Timothy McVeigh treated as an enemy combatant? Or do you have to be a Muslim?

Powerful!!!

It was a different time. In the post 911 world McVeigh would have been initially treated as enemy combatant.

RWers always find a way to explain and excuse it away when they want to.

"It was a different time back then...the Constitution wasn't the same."

LOL!!!

 

[g5000]

Was Timothy McVeigh treated as an enemy combatant? Or do you have to be a Muslim?

Powerful!!!

It was a different time. In the post 911 world McVeigh would have been initially treated as enemy combatant.

No, he would not have.

Can you name any terrorists captured on US soil post 9/11 who have not been tried in a US court?

 

[Rocko]

Powerful!!!

It was a different time. In the post 911 world McVeigh would have been initially treated as enemy combatant.

RWers always find a way to explain and excuse it away when they want to.

LOL!!!

What am I making an excuse for?

 

[MarcATL]

Powerful!!!

It was a different time. In the post 911 world McVeigh would have been initially treated as enemy combatant.

No, he would not have.

Can you name any terrorists captured on US soil post 9/11 who have not been tried in a US court?

Thank you g5000!

 

[g5000]

Underwear bomber: Convicted in US federal court.

Shoe bomber: Convicted in US federal court.

Times Square bomber: Convicted in US federal court.

Portland Christmas Tree bomber: Convicted in US federal court.