Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's not legal. They're both US citizens. So, we pick and choose whatever type of justice based on location?
According to whom? Case citation?
The Constitution requires due process, it neither requires due process to be judicial nor prohibits administrative due process just due process, which is afforded all citizens regardless of location.
Citations? Based on location and not the law? Perhaps you could cite where it's ok to drone a us citizen in yemen but not france? I know of none.
I'm a little puzzled. Why would you righties want it to be so that a citizen, not in the military, could be tried in a military tribunal when the crime they committed was within the US?
According to whom? Case citation?
The Constitution requires due process, it neither requires due process to be judicial nor prohibits administrative due process – just due process, which is afforded all citizens regardless of location.
Citations? Based on location and not the law? Perhaps you could cite where it's ok to drone a us citizen in yemen but not france? I know of none.
You stated that killing US citizens outside of the US was ‘not legal.’
I requested the Federal court ruling that determined such actions illegal.
Absent such a ruling your statement is incorrect and subjective opinion only, predicated likely on partisanism rather than the law.
Boston bombing suspect charged, will not be treated as enemy combatant
Read more: Boston bombing suspect charged, will not be treated as enemy combatant | Fox News
will be tried in civilian courts...there you have it
To liberals he is a confused teenager suffering from what evil Americans did to him.
That lesson wasn't enough. The next will have to be harsher. Chechens have a particular interest in killing children. I am so sorry for what is going to happen.
To this liberal he is not as confused about reality as you are.
Anything he's said is inadmissible
Yep, he wasn't read his miranda rights.
The underwear bomber and the Times Square guy were also not read their Miranda Rights as well.
I'm okay with that in the "public safety exception" cases where the guilt of the accused is a foregone conclusion but authorities want to get information from the accused that could be useful to help in other investigations, say.
This is not a precedent, and in this case, it was useful because the kid can provide information about his brother more freely than had they mirandized him right away.
Now, to the conservatives here, I want to know why the lot of you want things both ways. You want him designated as an enemy combatant so that we can just behead him or some such thing, but then you jump on Obama for not mirandizing him. Which one is it? You can't have both.
No, he would not have.
Can you name any terrorists captured on US soil post 9/11 who have not been tried in a US court?
Good point, but there is no legal justification for your theory that location is the determining factor.
If I had plenipotentiary powers, I would put every detainee in Gitmo on trial in a US court. I would treat them like any other criminals, and I would build a prison in one of the more remote areas of Montana to put them in after their convictions.
In addition to murder, maiming, and mayhem, I hope he is tried for high treason.Boston bombing suspect charged, will not be treated as enemy combatant
Read more: Boston bombing suspect charged, will not be treated as enemy combatant | Fox News
will be tried in civilian courts...there you have it
In addition to murder, maiming, and mayhem, I hope he is tried for high treason.Boston bombing suspect charged, will not be treated as enemy combatant
Read more: Boston bombing suspect charged, will not be treated as enemy combatant | Fox News
will be tried in civilian courts...there you have it
In addition to murder, maiming, and mayhem, I hope he is tried for high treason.Boston bombing suspect charged, will not be treated as enemy combatant
Read more: Boston bombing suspect charged, will not be treated as enemy combatant | Fox News
will be tried in civilian courts...there you have it
In addition to murder, maiming, and mayhem, I hope he is tried for high treason.Boston bombing suspect charged, will not be treated as enemy combatant
Read more: Boston bombing suspect charged, will not be treated as enemy combatant | Fox News
will be tried in civilian courts...there you have it
That would be good but it is going to depend either on a confession of his or outside evidence.
In addition to murder, maiming, and mayhem, I hope he is tried for high treason.
That would be good but it is going to depend either on a confession of his or outside evidence.
Treason? Are you right wingers really this deluded or do you do this in order to entertain?
Some asshole bomber is not waging war against America.
In addition to murder, maiming, and mayhem, I hope he is tried for high treason.
That would be good but it is going to depend either on a confession of his or outside evidence.
Treason? Are you right wingers really this deluded or do you do this in order to entertain?
Some asshole bomber is not waging war against America.
That would be good but it is going to depend either on a confession of his or outside evidence.
Treason? Are you right wingers really this deluded or do you do this in order to entertain?
Some asshole bomber is not waging war against America.
how do you know? cite proof.
That would be good but it is going to depend either on a confession of his or outside evidence.
Treason? Are you right wingers really this deluded or do you do this in order to entertain?
Some asshole bomber is not waging war against America.
If the reports of yesterday are true, the two cocksucker Boston Marathon bombing brothers might have been part of a sleeper cell.; trained by others and possibly just a cog in a larger effort.
So, what's YOUR basis, you arrogant nitwit, to claim that they are not part of an effort to wage war against America?
