Vastator
Platinum Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 22,753
- 10,367
Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras free to be as successful as they want to be as countries. I couldn’t care less. I’m not talking about the countries. I’m talking about the trash from those countries that keeps getting chucked over the fence into my country; where me, and mine have to pay for it. I care about me, and mine above all else. What you call evil is what me, and mine call love.If the result of invading other countries and taking over their governments, resources, and way of life, while creating an illegal immigration/refugees crisis at the border, that the US pays for, and has had to deal with because of what we did, how did that equate to success?Nothing semantic about it. The difference between the two is success. It’s in mine, and my kins interest to see that they don’t succeed. How’s that cover it for you?Is your argument about semantics or the issue, because I see nothing there that covers the issue?Conquerors... There’s a huge difference.The US are the invaders there chief. Always remember that. Your problem with illegal immigration starts with US illegal immigration. Imperial Borders and Mythical Frontiers - TheHumanist.com Your argument doesn't have a leg to stand on.Whackos with guns, and an agenda haven’t cost me anything. Invaders cost us all daily. And there isn’t a single attempt Trump has made to address the illegals issue that the left hasn’t resisted.
And why would you not want countries like Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras to succeed? What have these people done to you?
Your argument is one that justifies pure evil by the way.