Breaking: FBI BACKS CIA View that Russia Intervened to Help Trump Win Election

What does that have to do with the fact that Comey is a Obama administration toady?

You just told us that you have no evidence to support your idiotic fake news.

You can't even write something coherent. Are you huffing paint?

It's perfectly coherent to everyone who isn't a moron like you.

You keep telling yourself that champ.

huffing_paint.png

What is that photo supposed to indicate?

Perfect.
Stay gold Ponyboy!
You're a douche bag.
 
It's impossible to quantify how many voters were turned off of Clinton but it's also equally impossible to to say it had no effect at all.
So you have no idea, you haven't even seen the evidence yet, so you know nothing nothing more than me all this blst for absolutely nothing! And you wanted to maintain power. See, that was noticed by voters and wanted no more of it

No one does. That's the point, dope.

If you haven't seen the evidence, then you have no case. Thanks for admitting that.

It's all around you.
You only refuses to see it.
No wonder your world is always in shambles.

What's all around me is leftwing butthurt, fake news and propaganda. There is no actual evidence of anything leftwing douche bags claim about the election.
What isn't fake is libturds are losers today
 
Is that why one of the experts that has worked on the case just fucking told you in the video how it happened and gave you evidence?
Surrrrrre

Haha so now that it isn't unnamed sources, and actually evidence coming from a guy working on the case... that's the best you got?

You and fucking Bi-sexual, i mean bripat9643 should get married.

:lol:
You really need to listen to what he says

I listened to exactly what he said... you guys didn't.
The dude stated "they get in". He didn't say they got in. Dude he has no fking idea of anything. Circumstantial A theory. it's obvious he was careful with the words he chose

Keep trying Bro... keep trying.
 

Yes, they are all fake news. Check your sources. They all said Trump had no chance of winning the nomination or of winning the general election.

Oh, ok, well I'm glad to have you on record saying that WND, TheHill, IssueHawk, Politico, TeaPartyUSA, and Fox News are "fake news" outlets. lol

:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

Wrong, idiot. WND, Fox News, The Hill and TeaPartyUSA merely quote the story published by the Washington Post. Issue Hawk cites The Hill which cites the Washington Post. All stories rely on anonymous sources.

Basically what he have here is a daisy chain of fake news. That's how leftwing propaganda works. On outlet publishes some horseshit lies, and then all the others cite in and endless chain of fake news.

What does independently confirmed mean to you?

What does that have to do with the fact that all these articles have the same exact source?

How was it "independently confirmed?"
 
Haha so now that it isn't unnamed sources, and actually evidence coming from a guy working on the case... that's the best you got?

You and fucking Bi-sexual, i mean bripat9643 should get married.

:lol:
You really need to listen to what he says

I listened to exactly what he said... you guys didn't.
The dude stated "they get in". He didn't say they got in. Dude he has no fking idea of anything. Circumstantial A theory. it's obvious he was careful with the words he chose

Tell us some more about Clinton's server hack.
Listen to Comey he was involved in that news not me!

Derp.

You asserted earlier that it was certain even though no one has ever said that.

Nice standards bro.
 
"Waaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhh I don't like what this news report says so I'm gonna say it isn't true!!!! Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh"

:crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby:
It's fake news right? You have no evidence right? I'd be laughing that hard too and am!

You lost so you no longer get the say!

I posted links from several conservative sources, are those "fake news" outlets as well? Dumbass.
Yes

Good to have you on record saying Fox News, Politico, TheHill and WND are fake news sites. I'll remember that next time you post something from them.

Where do they have left to possibly get news?

The Dear Leader will provide.
 
Then you have specific numbers ?

Otherwise it is very disputable.

It's impossible to quantify how many voters were turned off of Clinton but it's also equally impossible to to say it had no effect at all.
So you have no idea, you haven't even seen the evidence yet, so you know nothing nothing more than me all this blst for absolutely nothing! And you wanted to maintain power. See, that was noticed by voters and wanted no more of it

No one does. That's the point, dope.

If you haven't seen the evidence, then you have no case. Thanks for admitting that.

It's all around you.
You only refuses to see it.
No wonder your world is always in shambles.
Fake news? You're correct
 
Surrrrrre

Haha so now that it isn't unnamed sources, and actually evidence coming from a guy working on the case... that's the best you got?

You and fucking Bi-sexual, i mean bripat9643 should get married.

:lol:
You really need to listen to what he says

I listened to exactly what he said... you guys didn't.
The dude stated "they get in". He didn't say they got in. Dude he has no fking idea of anything. Circumstantial A theory. it's obvious he was careful with the words he chose

Keep trying Bro... keep trying.
What?
 

Wrong, idiot. WND, Fox News, The Hill and TeaPartyUSA merely quote the story published by the Washington Post. Issue Hawk cites The Hill which cites the Washington Post. All stories rely on anonymous sources.

Basically what he have here is a daisy chain of fake news. That's how leftwing propaganda works. On outlet publishes some horseshit lies, and then all the others cite in and endless chain of fake news.

What does independently confirmed mean to you?

What does that have to do with the fact that all these articles have the same exact source?

How was it "independently confirmed?"


Exactly!

Stay gold Ponyboy!
 
You really need to listen to what he says

I listened to exactly what he said... you guys didn't.
The dude stated "they get in". He didn't say they got in. Dude he has no fking idea of anything. Circumstantial A theory. it's obvious he was careful with the words he chose

Tell us some more about Clinton's server hack.
Listen to Comey he was involved in that news not me!

Derp.

You asserted earlier that it was certain even though no one has ever said that.

Nice standards bro.
Yep, Comey stated it. It's why I directed you to him! He said it. Derp you are
 
"Waaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhh I don't like what this news report says so I'm gonna say it isn't true!!!! Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh"

:crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby:
It's fake news right? You have no evidence right? I'd be laughing that hard too and am!

You lost so you no longer get the say!

I posted links from several conservative sources, are those "fake news" outlets as well? Dumbass.
No you didn't. You posted conservative sources referring to an article published by the Washington Post. The same article that used anonymous sources and proved exactly nothing - fake news, in other words.

Yet independently verified.
 
You just admitted you have no evidence. You cite reports that no one has seen. Hey, have super secret friend who works for the CIA, and he says you're totally full of shit.

No prove that wrong.

You poor babies... you parroted the false reports that the FBI didn't agree with the CIA and other agencies... and then when it came out, that that was untrue, now the FBI is garbage again. You guys are bunch of fucking cry babies.
They don't

Ok...want some evidence?

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/video/cracking-code-russian-hacks-141509916.html

I'm not watching your fucking movie. I don't have that much patience.
You just admitted you have no evidence. You cite reports that no one has seen. Hey, have super secret friend who works for the CIA, and he says you're totally full of shit.

No prove that wrong.

You poor babies... you parroted the false reports that the FBI didn't agree with the CIA and other agencies... and then when it came out, that that was untrue, now the FBI is garbage again. You guys are bunch of fucking cry babies.
They don't

Ok...want some evidence?

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/video/cracking-code-russian-hacks-141509916.html

I watched your video. All it proved is that something was sent from the USA to Russia in the Cyrillic alphabet. It present no proof that it was information from the DNC or any Democrat.

Fake news.
^^^^^exactly and my hysterical answer

^Passing the bag.
 
"Waaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhh I don't like what this news report says so I'm gonna say it isn't true!!!! Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh"

:crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby:
It's fake news right? You have no evidence right? I'd be laughing that hard too and am!

You lost so you no longer get the say!

I posted links from several conservative sources, are those "fake news" outlets as well? Dumbass.
No you didn't. You posted conservative sources referring to an article published by the Washington Post. The same article that used anonymous sources and proved exactly nothing - fake news, in other words.

Yet independently verified..........

by................Obama and his press secretary, Josh Earnest,


.
 
Gee, it's about time. :rolleyes-41:

FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, according to U.S. officials.

Comey’s support for the CIA’s conclusion suggests that the leaders of the three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA.

“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.
Rest here: FBI backs CIA view that Russia intervened to help Trump win election

Here you go citing a known fake news service again:
and this:
"“Earlier this week, I met separately with FBI [Director] James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” Brennan said, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message."

All this says is that they agree on "scope, nature and intent", it omits what they think that "scope, nature and intent" is...which is exactly how fake news works.

Exactly what every agency is reporting. WTF do you think they are referring to?
 
Guide to planting a "believable" Fake News story:

1) Make sure the story is:
: independently confirmed = same story reported by 2 or more fake news agencies. NBC repeats CBS story, Puffington Host reports as fact- CONFIRMED!! CONSENSUS!!
2) Always use:
: unnamed sources
= a complete fabrication with no one to hold accountable after the story is inevitably debunked. Unnamed officials have CONFIRMED!! CONSENSUS!!
3) All sources speak:
: Off the record = Speaking off the record, the "unnamed sources" CONFIRM!! the lie is true!! CONFIRMED!! CONSENSUS!!
4) Use a Boogeyman!!
: Russians, Iranians, Syrians, North Koreans, Venezuelans, and Cubans are perfect boogeymen!

Follow these simple steps and your Fake News story will be swallowed whole!! With any luck, you'll get a WAR!!!
 
It's impossible to quantify how many voters were turned off of Clinton but it's also equally impossible to to say it had no effect at all.
So you have no idea, you haven't even seen the evidence yet, so you know nothing nothing more than me all this blst for absolutely nothing! And you wanted to maintain power. See, that was noticed by voters and wanted no more of it

No one does. That's the point, dope.

If you haven't seen the evidence, then you have no case. Thanks for admitting that.

It's all around you.
You only refuses to see it.
No wonder your world is always in shambles.



The "evidence is all around us"

Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmm


Let me guess what drug you are on.........yep LSD.


.
I only ingest pure, clean American truth.
 

Wrong, idiot. WND, Fox News, The Hill and TeaPartyUSA merely quote the story published by the Washington Post. Issue Hawk cites The Hill which cites the Washington Post. All stories rely on anonymous sources.

Basically what he have here is a daisy chain of fake news. That's how leftwing propaganda works. On outlet publishes some horseshit lies, and then all the others cite in and endless chain of fake news.

What does independently confirmed mean to you?



"Independently confirmed" coming from you means that it hasn't been independently confirmed.


.
When it comes from Fox?
 
Guide to planting a "believable" Fake News story:

1) Make sure the story is:
: independently confirmed = same story reported by 2 or more fake news agencies. NBC repeats CBS story, Puffington Host reports as fact- CONFIRMED!! CONSENSUS!!
2) Always use:
: unnamed sources = a complete fabrication with no one to hold accountable after the story is inevitably debunked. Unnamed officials have CONFIRMED!! CONSENSUS!!
3) All sources speak:
: Off the record = Speaking off the record, the "unnamed sources" CONFIRM!! the lie is true!! CONFIRMED!! CONSENSUS!!
4) Use a Boogeyman!!
: Russians, Iranians, Syrians, North Koreans, Venezuelans, and Cubans are perfect boogeymen!

Follow these simple steps and your Fake News story will be swallowed whole!! With any luck, you'll get a WAR!!!

jill-greenberg-crying-photoshopped-babies-end-times-18.jpg
 
So you have no idea, you haven't even seen the evidence yet, so you know nothing nothing more than me all this blst for absolutely nothing! And you wanted to maintain power. See, that was noticed by voters and wanted no more of it

No one does. That's the point, dope.

If you haven't seen the evidence, then you have no case. Thanks for admitting that.

It's all around you.
You only refuses to see it.
No wonder your world is always in shambles.



The "evidence is all around us"

Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmm


Let me guess what drug you are on.........yep LSD.


.
I only ingest pure, clean American truth.


HUH?

Is that the name of the lab that makes your LSD? American Truth?

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top