Breaking:House Intel Chair: Trump and team spied on during transition

Snowflakes like Mud and Billy_Boob continue to fling nonesne, but it is clear that the FBI and intel agencies are on the trail of Comrade Trump.

Nunes has now joined the administration conspiracy to thwart the pursuit of justice.
A Snowflake calling me a Snowflake is so friggen funny.
 
re·it·er·ate
rēˈidəˌrāt/
verb
past tense: reiterated; past participle: reiterated

say something again or a number of times, typically for emphasis or clarity.


Politico
: Nunes “Reiterated” There Was No Proof Of Trump’s Wiretap Claim.
During the same March 22 briefing, Nunes said -- contrary to what some members of conservative media now claim -- he still “he had no evidence of” Trump’s claim that Obama ordered a wiretap of Trump Tower. [Politico, 3/22/17]
 
The Obama admin made no such request for a warrant.

SO they most likely did this without a warrant. You cant do this to US citizens without a warrant.

Nice deflection, try again

Under the patriot act that Bush enacted, there is no need for a seperate warrant when the conversation of a FISA target involves an ameri can. There inclusion is considered incidental aka collateral damage. And because most intercepts are not actively monitored, or even listen to for years, that information can be retained for 5 years. and possibly longer. The ruling of the FISA court allowed for a 5 year retention when confronted with a requirement to purge american conservations from the system.
You assume a valid FISA warrant. Which is possible, but denied by all agencies of the federal government today..

But the illegal compilation of data specifically on Trump and his team make Trump the target. Who authorized that? The dissemination of unmasked conversations and transcripts is strictly forbidden and is a felony. Again who authorized that?
 
Snowflakes like Mud and Billy_Boob continue to fling nonesne, but it is clear that the FBI and intel agencies are on the trail of Comrade Trump.

Nunes has now joined the administration conspiracy to thwart the pursuit of justice.
A Snowflake calling me a Snowflake is so friggen funny.
What's that, snowflake? Get down to the drug store to get some butt hurt creme so you can get back on OP.
 
Of course. The Trump team's ties to Russia are being investigated, and you think the investigation should exclude the Trump team? Crazy.

Just more deflection away from the Comrade and the Russian connection.

The Republican Party has gone TOTALLY over.to a Pro Russian stance.

I guess they endorce Putin and Assad's barrel bombs...
What part of absolutely zero evidence don't you understand, you fucking putz???
Proof of republicans fawning over Russia? Up until Trump's collusion was unmasked, the proof was here at USMB and on every media outlet with a pro-GOP host or guest.
 
I understand what the methods were in obtaining the data and phone conversations. The problem is when federal agents were tasked to focus on Trump and his team, create reports and then distribute these far and wide with all parties and information unmasked..

Under federal law, there is wide lattitude allowed in impeachable evidence. Even evidence that would be illegal to present as direct, is allowed to impeach claims made. Ex: use of illegal wiretaps, illegal eavesdropping or stolen documents So when Trump and associates said they had no conversations with the Russians, they were merely gathering evidence with which to impeach that claim. And would probably be presentable if the case went to federal court.
When did Trump claim they had no conversations with Russians?????

Get your facts straight, dipshit.

Michael Flynn told the VP he had no communications with Russian officials and Trump fired him for that.

I can see that the left feels that nothing the Obama administration did was Obama's fault, but every God Damned thing that a Trump official ever says or does in his entire fucking life, from the VP down to the guy that cleans the friggen toilets, was assisted personally by Donald J. TRUMP.
 
But the illegal compilation of data specifically on Trump and his team make Trump the target. Who authorized that? The dissemination of unmasked conversations and transcripts is strictly forbidden and is a felony. Again who authorized that?

Trump and or his afiliates are still the secondaries.
 
Of course. The Trump team's ties to Russia are being investigated, and you think the investigation should exclude the Trump team? Crazy.

Just more deflection away from the Comrade and the Russian connection.

The Republican Party has gone TOTALLY over.to a Pro Russian stance.

I guess they endorce Putin and Assad's barrel bombs...
What part of absolutely zero evidence don't you understand, you fucking putz???
Proof of republicans fawning over Russia? Up until Trump's collusion was unmasked, the proof was here at USMB and on every media outlet with a pro-GOP host or guest.
So it's Trump's fault that conservatives on this board think Putin shows better leadership traits than Obummer?

Who's fault is that???
 
Snowflakes like Mud and Billy_Boob continue to fling nonesne, but it is clear that the FBI and intel agencies are on the trail of Comrade Trump.

Nunes has now joined the administration conspiracy to thwart the pursuit of justice.
A Snowflake calling me a Snowflake is so friggen funny.
What's that, snowflake? Get down to the drug store to get some butt hurt creme so you can get back on OP.
Says the butthurt little Snowflake.
 
When did Trump claim they had no conversations with Russians?????

Get your facts straight, dipshit.
.

Start with the Trump statement that he didn't know Putin, that Trump didn't even know who Vladimir Putin was. Then there was Sessions and Flynn claimed they never had communications with the Russians. A whole host of denialson the public record.
 
re·it·er·ate
rēˈidəˌrāt/
verb
past tense: reiterated; past participle: reiterated

say something again or a number of times, typically for emphasis or clarity.


Politico
: Nunes “Reiterated” There Was No Proof Of Trump’s Wiretap Claim.
During the same March 22 briefing, Nunes said -- contrary to what some members of conservative media now claim -- he still “he had no evidence of” Trump’s claim that Obama ordered a wiretap of Trump Tower. [Politico, 3/22/17]
No proof who ordered it.......YET.

Oh....and you forgot that he said he didn't know who ordered it but couldn’t rule out Obama.

Guess that got by you......
 
When did Trump claim they had no conversations with Russians?????

Get your facts straight, dipshit.
.

Start with the Trump statement that he didn't know Putin, that Trump didn't even know who Vladimir Putin was. Then there was Sessions and Flynn claimed they never had communications with the Russians. A whole host of denialson the public record.
^^^ Just the tip of the iceberg. Comrade Trump's popularity fell to 37% yesterday.
 
But the illegal compilation of data specifically on Trump and his team make Trump the target. Who authorized that? The dissemination of unmasked conversations and transcripts is strictly forbidden and is a felony. Again who authorized that?

Trump and or his afiliates are still the secondaries.
Not any more. Once they began collating specific information and disseminating pointed and focused reports on TRUMP and his people they made him the target of an illegal investigation.

I want to know who ordered that retasking as it violated the fourth amendment and was illegal. Fruit of the poisonous vine then entraped everything they have done.
 
When did Trump claim they had no conversations with Russians?????

Get your facts straight, dipshit.
.

Start with the Trump statement that he didn't know Putin, that Trump didn't even know who Vladimir Putin was. Then there was Sessions and Flynn claimed they never had communications with the Russians. A whole host of denialson the public record.
Flynn is gone.

Sessions wasn’t asked specifically if he had been contacted by Russians or met with them while the transition was ongoing. Al Franken made the claim that Sessions lied, which is highly debatable.
What Sessions later said was that he often met with officials from a buttload of countries while he was on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, you fucking tool!!!!#@%^#%^
 
Not any more. Once they began collating specific information and disseminating pointed and focused reports on TRUMP and his people they made him the target of an illegal investigation.

I want to know who ordered that retasking as it violated the fourth amendment and was illegal. Fruit of the poisonous vine then entrap everything they did.

According to what Rogers said, once they get a FISA warrant it pretty much never expires....carte blanche to listen in on anything and everything....that needs to stop.
 
When did Trump claim they had no conversations with Russians?????

Get your facts straight, dipshit.
.

Start with the Trump statement that he didn't know Putin, that Trump didn't even know who Vladimir Putin was. Then there was Sessions and Flynn claimed they never had communications with the Russians. A whole host of denialson the public record.
^^^ Just the tip of the iceberg. Comrade Trump's popularity fell to 37% yesterday.
Sure it did...Snowflake.
 
Personally, I would very much love to do a spinning roundhouse kick to this stupid assholes lying face.

al-franken-family.jpg.cf.jpg


720x405-R1229_SNL_Package_03.jpg.cf.jpg
 
I want to know who ordered that retasking as it violated the fourth amendment and was illegal. Fruit of the poisonous vine then entraped everything they have done.
That's fruit of the poison TREE, a 4th amendment protective principle from the USSC. But what you called the retasking is nothing more than looking at the same data in a different way.

Consider all the photographic and video evidence they had on the Boston marathon bombers, which was collected from private video cameras, yet was useable against an american without violating hijs 4th amendment rights. Primarialy because they were caught as secondaries, and were not the targets of the photographic surveillance, both public and private.,
 

Forum List

Back
Top