OldLady
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2015
- 69,568
- 19,607
"no" would have sufficed.Sorry if he didn’t produce a Top Secret document for everyone to read. If you're waiting on that I suggest you shit in one hand and let him put TS information in the other and see which one fills first.What did I miss Mudwhistle? Where is the solid proof? I'm not saying I buy the collusion claims either, without more evidence, but I have not heard of any additional solid proof other than the innuendo and vague reports Nunes was talking about yesterday. Has more come forward? If so, you got a link?Actually we now have solid proof that Trump was spied on and it had nothing to do with spying on Russians, which is more than you can say about this fake collusion with Russian claim.Bullshit. Nunes has provided no information whatsoever to us. If he said something of value to the President, fine, but since they are investigating the President's possible connection with the Russians, was it a good idea to go running to one of the targets of the investigation with information before it was given to the committee? And who did provide this information and why can't he even give copies to the President? He got to look at it but not touch it? Does that sound at all legit to you? I want a lot more facts. To me, what Nunes, CNN and all the posters here are just talking bullshit by trying to decide either way.Bullshit.There was a reason for Watergate--trying to see what the DNC was up to during the campaign. What would be the point in wiretapping the Trump staff AFTER he had been elected? Isn't that a little late to be listening in? Unless it was related to the Russian investigation which Comey told us Monday has been ongoing. Just because the communications Nunes heard about didn't seem to him to be about Russia, he is not privvy to all the details of the investigation and since these statements he heard about were all cherry picked by the people who showed them to him, they could have been taken out of context and did indeed have something to do with the Russian investigation.
I think Nunes was stirring up mud so the Republicans wouldn't have to be quite so embarrassed over their Chief. I'm still patiently waiting, though, to hear what he was actually talking about.
First we heard about the leaks.
Then we heard that the Obama Administration filed for FISA warrents to investigate Trump.
Then Trump says his offices were spied on.
Then we heard it never happened.
Then you on the left demanded he apologize.
Then Democrats start calling for Impeachment.
Now we find out Trump was spied on.
Now you start accusing the whistle-blower of lying.
Next you'll be demanding an investigation.
After that you're going to demand his impeachment.