Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even if Arizona passes this lame legislation, Obama can still provide his COLB and they will accept it as proof
They are too big pussies to do otherwise
"Pussy" got nothing to do with it.
The LAW stipulates that they MUST accept a certified original copy of the COLB.
The abstract on the internet ain't going to cut it, though. Obama will have to produce the real one.
That's why you nutters are ofer out of 72 in the courts so far.
Oh, I'm sorry, 0-74.
I don't care who agrees with what. The document obama has was never accepted by the state registrar of 1961.
It doesn't matter if all Obama has is a piece of paper with "Obama was born" in crayon on it.
As long as it's officially accepted by the State of Hawaii as adequate proof, Arizona can't say shit about it. Period.
Only Congress and the Supreme Court have the right to overturn the judgement of Hawaii, and they won't, so Arizona can "suck it".
It doesn't matter if all Obama has is a piece of paper with "Obama was born" in crayon on it.
Truth be known thats all he does have, and thats the reason you and others like you are afraid that he will be forced to produce the long form.
Not even close pal. If one state says he was born in that state and certifies that fact......another state can't annul it
Secondly, Arizona needs tp prove in court that the additional info in the long form is needed to prove eligibility (35 yrs and natural born citizen)
Fail on both points
The law is illegal, so it will never be an issue.
What will they do if he provides that Hawaii certified COLB?
Does Arizona have the balls to keep him off the ballot?
If they do......what will be the nationwide retaliation against the GOP?
Panic? I dunno, I thought we were just laughing at you like we laugh at troofers.We are afraid you'll find out he is actually the love child of Adolf Hitler and Elvis Presley.
I always knew that Elvis was secretly black......
Seriously though, why are the leftists in full blown panic over this? It doesn't seem like a big deal, unless there is a problem with Obama....
What will they do if he provides that Hawaii certified COLB?
Accept it.
That's what the law stipulates.
Does Arizona have the balls to keep him off the ballot?
If they do......what will be the nationwide retaliation against the GOP?
If Obama can't provide a valid COLB? Why wouldn't he be able to? That's what you Fabians can't seem to answer - what is it that makes you so certain that he won't just produce one?
>
What some are missing is the fact that the law does not require a Presidential candidate to submit a long form birth certificate to establish their citizenship at birth.
>>>>
It doesn't matter if all Obama has is a piece of paper with "Obama was born" in crayon on it.
As long as it's officially accepted by the State of Hawaii as adequate proof, Arizona can't say shit about it. Period.
Only Congress and the Supreme Court have the right to overturn the judgement of Hawaii, and they won't, so Arizona can "suck it".
It doesn't matter if all Obama has is a piece of paper with "Obama was born" in crayon on it.
Truth be known thats all he does have, and thats the reason you and others like you are afraid that he will be forced to produce the long form.
So you agree. Burfers are stupid. They actually believe Clinton, McCain, the white house etc did not think of something the burfers think they have.
This is amazingly stupid. It really is. Didnt billO spend some of his own money investigating this crap and even he, a fox staple, couldnt find anything?
But burfers just know there is something wrong here. They just know it. Wow. By the way, how goes the Donald investigation?
stilll no proof?
Aren't you the one that mentioned the Full Faith and Credit Clause?.
The Full Faith and Credit ClauseArticle IV, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitutionprovides that the various states must recognize legislative acts, public records, and judicial decisions of the other states within the United States.
Aren't gun laws legislative acts?
The full faith and credit clause does not require a State to substitute for its own statute, applicable to persons and events within it, the conflicting statute of another State.
>
What some are missing is the fact that the law does not require a Presidential candidate to submit a long form birth certificate to establish their citizenship at birth.
>>>>
>
What some are missing is the fact that the law does not require a Presidential candidate to submit a long form birth certificate to establish their citizenship at birth.
>>>>
Every state has it's on rules for deciding the electoral process.
Aren't you the one that mentioned the Full Faith and Credit Clause?.
The Full Faith and Credit ClauseArticle IV, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitutionprovides that the various states must recognize legislative acts, public records, and judicial decisions of the other states within the United States.
Aren't gun laws legislative acts?
I find it difficult to believe that you would actually be so stupid as to believe the things you are saying. But just in case, maybe you'd be well to hear what the Supreme Court has to say about your theory.
Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident
The full faith and credit clause does not require a State to substitute for its own statute, applicable to persons and events within it, the conflicting statute of another State.
>
What some are missing is the fact that the law does not require a Presidential candidate to submit a long form birth certificate to establish their citizenship at birth.
>>>>
Every state has it's on rules for deciding the electoral process.
Your response has nothing to do with the statement. Care to address what I said?
>>>>
>
What some are missing is the fact that the law does not require a Presidential candidate to submit a long form birth certificate to establish their citizenship at birth.
>>>>
Every state has it's on rules for deciding the electoral process.
Your response has nothing to do with the statement. Care to address what I said?
>>>>
It has everything to do with the electoral process. thats what this bill is about.This is Arizona's electorial process, obama doesn't have to run on the ballot in Arizona. No one will be forcing him to not run in that STATE. SO DEAL WITH THAT.
What I want to see is when the the 1961 state registrar accepted the birth certificate that would be on the long form.
What I want to see is when the the 1961 state registrar accepted the birth certificate that would be on the long form.
You've already seen the date on which the records were filed. But you don't want to acknowledge it. You want to instead present an entirely made up procedural process and insist that the process was not completed in Obama's case, as if it even mattered.
obam's original document never was accepted by the 1961 state registrar. It was filed but never accepted. Maybe there was an error on the original appilcation maybe there wasn't enough proof of his birth place back in 1961. For what ever reason it never was accepted by the 1961 state registrar.
