jbrownson0831
Diamond Member
- Jul 27, 2020
- 23,685
- 21,123
The court is corrupt because Don't Know What a Female Is sits on it rumpart.no, we understand that this court is corrupt and only the optimists at du expect the conviction to keep.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The court is corrupt because Don't Know What a Female Is sits on it rumpart.no, we understand that this court is corrupt and only the optimists at du expect the conviction to keep.
Guilty and never gets to prove innocence right rumpart?"the people have a right to know if their president is a crook."
r m nixon
yea right. wait til after the election when he can pardon himself and reboot his criminal enterprise? best avoid that incredible precedent with a "speedy trial" that should have happened 2022 at the latest.
Story just broke.
Supreme Court accepts Jan. 6 case that could affect or delay Trump trial
The challenge involves a law used to charge hundreds in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riot, and also levied against former president Donald Trump.webcache.googleusercontent.com
HaHaHa, like democrat NY judge Engoron declaring Trump guilty before the trial? Hypocrite.
Read the Judge’s Ruling in the Trump Fraud Case
The decision by Justice Arthur F. Engoron is a major victory for Attorney General Letitia James in her lawsuit against Mr. Trump, effectively deciding that no trial was needed to determine that he had fraudulently secured favorable terms on loans and insurance deals.www.nytimes.com
Why not wait until after the presidential election?
Update
This statute that is so vague that it can be used by political prosecutors to persecute their opponents is not constitutional in the United Stares. The Justices should rule the statute void and quash the indictments.
Trump has not been convicted of a crime.Then every criminal in America need only announce a candidacy for an office, and they get to avoid justice for a while, if not altogether.
And if they don't they'll be corrupt or part of the deep state or scared of left wing violence. When you lose it can never be because you're wrong.Trump appointed Constitution originalists to the court. They will do the right sacred thing and shut Jack Smith's out of control lawfare down.
Democrats make their claims and then try to manufacture evidence to support their claims while ignoring everything that proves they're wrong.Sure that is what you are "suggesting" is happening in the SCOTUS without any evidence---but that's what democrats do. Make summary judgements without evidence.
BULLSHIT.ANd the debates were NOT recorded. Intentionally. What we have is a series of letters, or op-eds if you will, explaining the views of Federalists and Jeffersonian Democrats
Could not be more correctDemocrats make their claims and then try to manufacture evidence to support their claims while ignoring everything that proves they're wrong.
But….but….but….what about cell phones??BULLSHIT.
Founders Online: Constitutional Convention. Notes Taken in the Federal Conventi …
Constitutional Convention. Notes Taken in the Federal Convention, [1–26 June 1787]founders.archives.gov
The debates weren't recorded BECAUSE THERE WAS NO SUCH THING as a tape recorder. I mean deeyam the ignorance. But there are numerous journals, broadsides, and written documentation available to anyone willing to look. The above two a good start.
All the evidence is already inJust remember folks, conservative justices have already decided the case in their head. The only thing to do now is find a way to justify it.
The text of the law is irrelevant.
Blah, blah, blah--I don't buy the distraction whiner. You're complaining about a SCOTUS decision that hasn't happened yet, snowflake.You do know that is not unusual? And Trump had his sister leave her judgeship (the ones the Family-Trump bought)...
NYT:
President Trump’s older sister, Maryanne Trump Barry, has retired as a federal appellate judge, ending an investigation into whether she violated judicial conduct rules by participating in fraudulent tax schemes with her siblings.
The court inquiry stemmed from complaints filed last October, after an investigation by The New York Times found that the Trumps had engaged in dubious tax schemes during the 1990s, including instances of outright fraud, that greatly increased the inherited wealth of Mr. Trump and his siblings. Judge Barry not only benefited financially from most of those tax schemes, The Times found; she was also in a position to influence the actions taken by her family.
You could say the same thing about the liberal judges, and in fact, I'm sure some people are.Just remember folks, conservative justices have already decided the case in their head. The only thing to do now is find a way to justify it.
The text of the law is irrelevant.
BuT dER DeeBATZ wUR reCOded.
Originalism is intellectually bankrupt. It’s a farce and everyone knows it. Nothing more than the judiciary taking power they were never intended to have.
Reading the statute seems like a good place to start. The statute is clear but apparently we aren’t supposed to go by what the law actually says but what some justices think the people who wrote the law MEANT to say.You could say the same thing about the liberal judges, and in fact, I'm sure some people are.
Not yet. He's an alleged criminal. What a great distinction. Can you list all the former presidents who have been officially charged with crimes after leaving office?Trump has not been convicted of a crime.