Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First you say you understand the difference between being married and having sex and/or using artificial insemination to get pregnant. Then you prove that you don't understand the difference. Or at least that you are incapable of being honest.Procreation was only one potential aspect of marriage, and both sisters can procreate, try again.Two sisters can't procreate.
Try again
No they can't. Are you warped?
They would require a male
A third party
Oh, I get it , your argument for plural marriage.
I'm against plural marriage, obviously your not
You keep assuming that to procreate one must have a married partner inseminate you. That's not true. All you need is to have sex with someone of the other sex, or become artificially inseminated. As proof, I point you to the millions of single women that have babies every year.
Oh, I made no such assumption, I seem to be one of only a few that know how babies are actually made. The discussion was about marriage. You do realize that, right, and about married couples procreating within that marriage.
No same sex couplings have ever created a child. EVER.
That makes opposite sex coupling unique.
Every man, woman and child had come from those couplings. NOT A SINGLE CHILD HAD EVER BEEN PRODUCED FROM SAME SEX MASTURBATION.
No dumb ass.. that is your stupid ass argument. Who gives a flying eff if a guy can't get pregnant? What the hell does that have to do with with marriage? Who gives a shit if the woman can't get pregnant from her mate? What the hell does that have to do with marriage?First you say you understand the difference between being married and having sex and/or using artificial insemination to get pregnant. Then you prove that you don't understand the difference. Or at least that you are incapable of being honest.Procreation was only one potential aspect of marriage, and both sisters can procreate, try again.
No they can't. Are you warped?
They would require a male
A third party
Oh, I get it , your argument for plural marriage.
I'm against plural marriage, obviously your not
You keep assuming that to procreate one must have a married partner inseminate you. That's not true. All you need is to have sex with someone of the other sex, or become artificially inseminated. As proof, I point you to the millions of single women that have babies every year.
Oh, I made no such assumption, I seem to be one of only a few that know how babies are actually made. The discussion was about marriage. You do realize that, right, and about married couples procreating within that marriage.
No same sex couplings have ever created a child. EVER.
That makes opposite sex coupling unique.
Every man, woman and child had come from those couplings. NOT A SINGLE CHILD HAD EVER BEEN PRODUCED FROM SAME SEX MASTURBATION.
Please simpleton, the argument is not that pregnancy can occur, the argument is that in the demographic group you are siding with, that pregnancy had never occurred without an outside third party, making opposite sex couples quite unique when compared to same sex couplings.
Ramble on rambling man
who cares.....you are still going on about this....Doing exactly what i said you would do.No they can't. Are you warped?
They would require a male
A third party
Oh, I get it , your argument for plural marriage.
I'm against plural marriage, obviously your not
You keep assuming that to procreate one must have a married partner inseminate you. That's not true. All you need is to have sex with someone of the other sex, or become artificially inseminated. As proof, I point you to the millions of single women that have babies every year.
Oh, I made no such assumption, I seem to be one of only a few that know how babies are actually made. The discussion was about marriage. You do realize that, right, and about married couples procreating within that marriage.
No same sex couplings have ever created a child. EVER.
That makes opposite sex coupling unique.
Every man, woman and child had come from those couplings. NOT A SINGLE CHILD HAD EVER BEEN PRODUCED FROM SAME SEX MASTURBATION.
It's called flailing. They lost, you have to expect it.
It's called warning. We lose you can't stop incest and plural marriage
No dumb ass.. that is your stupid ass argument. Who gives a flying eff if a guy can't get pregnant? What the hell does that have to do with with marriage? Who gives a shit if the woman can't get pregnant from her mate? What the hell does that have to do with marriage?First you say you understand the difference between being married and having sex and/or using artificial insemination to get pregnant. Then you prove that you don't understand the difference. Or at least that you are incapable of being honest.No they can't. Are you warped?
They would require a male
A third party
Oh, I get it , your argument for plural marriage.
I'm against plural marriage, obviously your not
You keep assuming that to procreate one must have a married partner inseminate you. That's not true. All you need is to have sex with someone of the other sex, or become artificially inseminated. As proof, I point you to the millions of single women that have babies every year.
Oh, I made no such assumption, I seem to be one of only a few that know how babies are actually made. The discussion was about marriage. You do realize that, right, and about married couples procreating within that marriage.
No same sex couplings have ever created a child. EVER.
That makes opposite sex coupling unique.
Every man, woman and child had come from those couplings. NOT A SINGLE CHILD HAD EVER BEEN PRODUCED FROM SAME SEX MASTURBATION.
Please simpleton, the argument is not that pregnancy can occur, the argument is that in the demographic group you are siding with, that pregnancy had never occurred without an outside third party, making opposite sex couples quite unique when compared to same sex couplings.
Ramble on rambling man
I'm afraid that Stephanie is the victim of gay marriage. Draw what conclusions you wish from that.Gotta love those men and women in black robes. don't forget they BE THE LAW OF THE LAND
SNIP:
New York Appeals Court To Weigh Giving Legal Rights To Chimps…
Or as the left calls them, undocumented primates.
ALL of it here:
New York Appeals Court To Weigh Giving Legal Rights To Chimps Weasel Zippers
Why haven't you answered my question? How does my family and my legal civil marriage destroy anyone else's as you claimed earlier?
I don't care if you marry your dog. I'm talking about the legalities of all this and what it is going to bring DOWN on the rest of us in this country. I know you don't give a crap about anyone else. so don't ask me again
So be specific and tell us what horrible calamities are going to befall you because gays can legally marry. Give some details, Drama Queen.
Incest is a different issue than marriage. And, no you put yourself in your place.No dumb ass.. that is your stupid ass argument. Who gives a flying eff if a guy can't get pregnant? What the hell does that have to do with with marriage? Who gives a shit if the woman can't get pregnant from her mate? What the hell does that have to do with marriage?First you say you understand the difference between being married and having sex and/or using artificial insemination to get pregnant. Then you prove that you don't understand the difference. Or at least that you are incapable of being honest.You keep assuming that to procreate one must have a married partner inseminate you. That's not true. All you need is to have sex with someone of the other sex, or become artificially inseminated. As proof, I point you to the millions of single women that have babies every year.
Oh, I made no such assumption, I seem to be one of only a few that know how babies are actually made. The discussion was about marriage. You do realize that, right, and about married couples procreating within that marriage.
No same sex couplings have ever created a child. EVER.
That makes opposite sex coupling unique.
Every man, woman and child had come from those couplings. NOT A SINGLE CHILD HAD EVER BEEN PRODUCED FROM SAME SEX MASTURBATION.
Please simpleton, the argument is not that pregnancy can occur, the argument is that in the demographic group you are siding with, that pregnancy had never occurred without an outside third party, making opposite sex couples quite unique when compared to same sex couplings.
Ramble on rambling man
You go!
Who cares if a mother/daughter couple can't get pregnant, what does that have do do with marriage?
Guess you put me in my place aye pardner?
You are a hypocriteand where in the constitution is it prohibited for a person to be a bigot?
Actually, I misspoke there. You are allowed to be a bigot. You are just not allowed to act on that bigotry. Sorry, I wasn't clear enough there.
No it is not you are also a hypocrite.Incest is a different issue than marriage. And, no you put yourself in your place.No dumb ass.. that is your stupid ass argument. Who gives a flying eff if a guy can't get pregnant? What the hell does that have to do with with marriage? Who gives a shit if the woman can't get pregnant from her mate? What the hell does that have to do with marriage?First you say you understand the difference between being married and having sex and/or using artificial insemination to get pregnant. Then you prove that you don't understand the difference. Or at least that you are incapable of being honest.Oh, I made no such assumption, I seem to be one of only a few that know how babies are actually made. The discussion was about marriage. You do realize that, right, and about married couples procreating within that marriage.
No same sex couplings have ever created a child. EVER.
That makes opposite sex coupling unique.
Every man, woman and child had come from those couplings. NOT A SINGLE CHILD HAD EVER BEEN PRODUCED FROM SAME SEX MASTURBATION.
Please simpleton, the argument is not that pregnancy can occur, the argument is that in the demographic group you are siding with, that pregnancy had never occurred without an outside third party, making opposite sex couples quite unique when compared to same sex couplings.
Ramble on rambling man
You go!
Who cares if a mother/daughter couple can't get pregnant, what does that have do do with marriage?
Guess you put me in my place aye pardner?
I know. It's so much easier to just engage in ad hominems than it is to have to actually think, isn't it?You are a hypocriteand where in the constitution is it prohibited for a person to be a bigot?
Actually, I misspoke there. You are allowed to be a bigot. You are just not allowed to act on that bigotry. Sorry, I wasn't clear enough there.
You are a fucking piece of shit hypocrite it has nothing to do with protecting rights with youI know. It's so much easier to just engage in ad hominems than it is to have to actually think, isn't it?You are a hypocriteand where in the constitution is it prohibited for a person to be a bigot?
Actually, I misspoke there. You are allowed to be a bigot. You are just not allowed to act on that bigotry. Sorry, I wasn't clear enough there.
You are dismissed.
Nothing else was needed. Ad hominems are the last attempt of the desperate when they are too stupid to formulate actual intelligent replies.You are a fucking piece of shit hypocrite...I know. It's so much easier to just engage in ad hominems than it is to have to actually think, isn't it?You are a hypocriteand where in the constitution is it prohibited for a person to be a bigot?
Actually, I misspoke there. You are allowed to be a bigot. You are just not allowed to act on that bigotry. Sorry, I wasn't clear enough there.
You are dismissed.
You are a hypocrite stop whining when it's pointed out to you.Nothing else was needed. Ad hominems are the last attempt of the desperate when they are too stupid to formulate actual intelligent replies.You are a fucking piece of shit hypocrite...I know. It's so much easier to just engage in ad hominems than it is to have to actually think, isn't it?You are a hypocriteand where in the constitution is it prohibited for a person to be a bigot?
Actually, I misspoke there. You are allowed to be a bigot. You are just not allowed to act on that bigotry. Sorry, I wasn't clear enough there.
You are dismissed.
You really should go relax, and change you panties that you soiled.
Or you can continue to rant, and I'll just ignore you.
So, does anyone who is not stupid have anything they would like to add?
Well, duh! That's what I told you. Class is over. You're too stupid to make an actual argument, so you resort to grying to attack your opponent. You can go back to the kiddie table now. We're done with you. and repeating the same stupid useless attack over and over doesn't make you sound any less stupid. so you might as well just stop and slither on away to lick your wounds.Class is overNothing else was needed. Ad hominems are the last attempt of the desperate when they are too stupid to formulate actual intelligent replies.You are a fucking piece of shit hypocrite...I know. It's so much easier to just engage in ad hominems than it is to have to actually think, isn't it?You are a hypocriteActually, I misspoke there. You are allowed to be a bigot. You are just not allowed to act on that bigotry. Sorry, I wasn't clear enough there.
You are dismissed.
You really should go relax, and change you panties that you soiled.
Or you can continue to rant, and I'll just ignore you.
So, does anyone who is not stupid have anything they would like to add?
I'm afraid that Stephanie is the victim of gay marriage. Draw what conclusions you wish from that.Gotta love those men and women in black robes. don't forget they BE THE LAW OF THE LAND
SNIP:
New York Appeals Court To Weigh Giving Legal Rights To Chimps…
Or as the left calls them, undocumented primates.
ALL of it here:
New York Appeals Court To Weigh Giving Legal Rights To Chimps Weasel Zippers
Why haven't you answered my question? How does my family and my legal civil marriage destroy anyone else's as you claimed earlier?
I don't care if you marry your dog. I'm talking about the legalities of all this and what it is going to bring DOWN on the rest of us in this country. I know you don't give a crap about anyone else. so don't ask me again
So be specific and tell us what horrible calamities are going to befall you because gays can legally marry. Give some details, Drama Queen.
Nothing else was needed. Ad hominems are the last attempt of the desperate when they are too stupid to formulate actual intelligent replies.You are a fucking piece of shit hypocrite...I know. It's so much easier to just engage in ad hominems than it is to have to actually think, isn't it?You are a hypocriteand where in the constitution is it prohibited for a person to be a bigot?
Actually, I misspoke there. You are allowed to be a bigot. You are just not allowed to act on that bigotry. Sorry, I wasn't clear enough there.
You are dismissed.
You really should go relax, and change you panties that you soiled.
Or you can continue to rant, and I'll just ignore you.
So, does anyone who is not stupid have anything they would like to add?
funny how all the states rights nonsense being touted here only comes up when we have a black president and gay people are finally getting some equal treatment.
I'm afraid that Stephanie is the victim of gay marriage. Draw what conclusions you wish from that.Gotta love those men and women in black robes. don't forget they BE THE LAW OF THE LAND
SNIP:
New York Appeals Court To Weigh Giving Legal Rights To Chimps…
Or as the left calls them, undocumented primates.
ALL of it here:
New York Appeals Court To Weigh Giving Legal Rights To Chimps Weasel Zippers
Why haven't you answered my question? How does my family and my legal civil marriage destroy anyone else's as you claimed earlier?
I don't care if you marry your dog. I'm talking about the legalities of all this and what it is going to bring DOWN on the rest of us in this country. I know you don't give a crap about anyone else. so don't ask me again
So be specific and tell us what horrible calamities are going to befall you because gays can legally marry. Give some details, Drama Queen.
Well, I've always said that if gay marriage has any affect on your marriage, one or both of you is gay.
No it is not you are also a hypocrite.Incest is a different issue than marriage. And, no you put yourself in your place.No dumb ass.. that is your stupid ass argument. Who gives a flying eff if a guy can't get pregnant? What the hell does that have to do with with marriage? Who gives a shit if the woman can't get pregnant from her mate? What the hell does that have to do with marriage?First you say you understand the difference between being married and having sex and/or using artificial insemination to get pregnant. Then you prove that you don't understand the difference. Or at least that you are incapable of being honest.
Please simpleton, the argument is not that pregnancy can occur, the argument is that in the demographic group you are siding with, that pregnancy had never occurred without an outside third party, making opposite sex couples quite unique when compared to same sex couplings.
Ramble on rambling man
You go!
Who cares if a mother/daughter couple can't get pregnant, what does that have do do with marriage?
Guess you put me in my place aye pardner?
