Breaking News: White House Leakers Identified

[kiwiman127]

The story is "fake news"
The give away involves the Office of Government Ethics.
From Breitbart: " According to Yingst, three staffers have been identified and referred to the Office of Government Ethics for their role in leaking information from within the White House. Leaks to the mainstream press have constantly plagued the Trump administration in its early days, with opportunely time leaks undermining key administration efforts."
The Trump Administration doesn't want anything to do with the Office of Government Ethics, because the Office of Government Ethics wants something from the White House.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/...e-house-government-ethics-lobbyists.html?_r=0
Ahhh, the Trump Transparency strikes again!

 

[Sun Devil 92]

This has reached a new level of stupidity.

 

[Crixus]

It was inevitable that they would be caught sooner or later.



www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/22/report-leakers-discovered-inside-white-house-president-trump-expected-to-fire-them-soon/

Mmm, I hope it's true, but really this is no better then the speculation from the left as it's all "unnamed sources ".

 

[JonKoch]

It was inevitable that they would be caught sooner or later.



www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/22/report-leakers-discovered-inside-white-house-president-trump-expected-to-fire-them-soon/

Mmm, I hope it's true, but really this is no better then the speculation from the left as it's all "unnamed sources ".

You "think" the right wing infotainment complex would be so smart to put out deliberate fake news just to get their base riled up??? Nah

 

[JonKoch]

...

 

[BlindBoo]

We know that Rice lied about Benghazi. What we don't know is how many protests and deaths that resulted because of those lies.

Two points of bullshit for ya. First, Ambassador Rice delivered the administrations talking points and did not lie. Second is she delivered the talking points on the 16th, the deadly riots had already spread.

When America was attacked on 9-11 Democrats joined Republicans and supported President Bush to show our enemies that were united against them. When we were attacked in 2012, as the riots were spreading and becoming more violent, the Republicans used it as a platform to attack the Democrats. United we stand, divided we fall. The KGB took full advantage of the Republicans willingness to divide this country. Once divided, you know what comes next.

 

[Crixus]

It was inevitable that they would be caught sooner or later.



www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/22/report-leakers-discovered-inside-white-house-president-trump-expected-to-fire-them-soon/

Mmm, I hope it's true, but really this is no better then the speculation from the left as it's all "unnamed sources ".

You "think" the right wing infotainment complex would be so smart to put out deliberate fake news just to get their base riled up??? Nah

All of them do it.

 

[JonKoch]

It was inevitable that they would be caught sooner or later.



www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/22/report-leakers-discovered-inside-white-house-president-trump-expected-to-fire-them-soon/

Mmm, I hope it's true, but really this is no better then the speculation from the left as it's all "unnamed sources ".

You "think" the right wing infotainment complex would be so smart to put out deliberate fake news just to get their base riled up??? Nah

All of them do it.

 

[Freewill]

We know that Rice lied about Benghazi. What we don't know is how many protests and deaths that resulted because of those lies.

Two points of bullshit for ya. First, Ambassador Rice delivered the administrations talking points and did not lie. Second is she delivered the talking points on the 16th, the deadly riots had already spread.

When America was attacked on 9-11 Democrats joined Republicans and supported President Bush to show our enemies that were united against them. When we were attacked in 2012, as the riots were spreading and becoming more violent, the Republicans used it as a platform to attack the Democrats. United we stand, divided we fall. The KGB took full advantage of the Republicans willingness to divide this country. Once divided, you know what comes next.

 

[Freewill]

We know that Rice lied about Benghazi. What we don't know is how many protests and deaths that resulted because of those lies.

Two points of bullshit for ya. First, Ambassador Rice delivered the administrations talking points and did not lie. Second is she delivered the talking points on the 16th, the deadly riots had already spread.

When America was attacked on 9-11 Democrats joined Republicans and supported President Bush to show our enemies that were united against them. When we were attacked in 2012, as the riots were spreading and becoming more violent, the Republicans used it as a platform to attack the Democrats. United we stand, divided we fall. The KGB took full advantage of the Republicans willingness to divide this country. Once divided, you know what comes next.

No one in their right mind still believes Rice didn't mislead America and the world. She repeated the lie that lead to more riots, whether it was her saying the lie or Obama or Hillary that can be argued. But what we know is that prior to Benghazi, and the lies that followed, there was ONE peaceful protest. Clue for YOU, Benghazi didn't happen over a video, Rice, Obama and Hillary all lied to you and the world that is beyond doubt.

As far as I know, Bush never lied about 9/11. As far as I know Bush didn't allow the twin towers to be in harms way then lie about it.

They lied, they all lied, that is what make Benghazi different. That and it was all about gun running.

http://www.wnd.com/2017/04/susan-rice-has-long-history-of-lying-to-cover-for-obama/

 

[Freewill]

It was inevitable that they would be caught sooner or later.



www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/22/report-leakers-discovered-inside-white-house-president-trump-expected-to-fire-them-soon/

Mmm, I hope it's true, but really this is no better then the speculation from the left as it's all "unnamed sources ".

You "think" the right wing infotainment complex would be so smart to put out deliberate fake news just to get their base riled up??? Nah

All of them do it.

Do you really believe that there were no other attacks on Diplomatic mission during the Obama administration? Do you really? Do a google you will see there were. What makes Benghazi different? The lies and the sheer stupidity of allowing our ambassador in the country we just bombed the crap out of without proper protection. On top of that having him supply arms to the opposition sealed his fate. Then they lied.

 

[JonKoch]

It was inevitable that they would be caught sooner or later.



www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/22/report-leakers-discovered-inside-white-house-president-trump-expected-to-fire-them-soon/

Mmm, I hope it's true, but really this is no better then the speculation from the left as it's all "unnamed sources ".

You "think" the right wing infotainment complex would be so smart to put out deliberate fake news just to get their base riled up??? Nah

All of them do it.

Do you really believe that there were no other attacks on Diplomatic mission during the Obama administration? Do you really? Do a google you will see there were. What makes Benghazi different? The lies and the sheer stupidity of allowing our ambassador in the country we just bombed the crap out of without proper protection. On top of that having him supply arms to the opposition sealed his fate. Then they lied.

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: ‘You Have To Prioritize Things’
Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things' | HuffPost




November 21, 2014

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.


Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.


....Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel.

The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.
House Intelligence Committee investigation debunks many Benghazi theories



Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say


In the month before attackers stormed U.S. facilities in Benghazi and killed four Americans, U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens twice turned down offers of security assistance made by the senior U.S. military official in the region in response to concerns that Stevens had raised in a still secret memorandum

Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say

 

[CrusaderFrank]

LOL.

President "Grabby" has the bestest leakers ever.

Inside sources say the leakers were unchaperoned women. Pence's worst fears were correct!!!

Ok, that was funny right there

 

[my2¢]

Which one of the 3 leaked this story?

 

[Freewill]

Mmm, I hope it's true, but really this is no better then the speculation from the left as it's all "unnamed sources ".

You "think" the right wing infotainment complex would be so smart to put out deliberate fake news just to get their base riled up??? Nah

All of them do it.

Do you really believe that there were no other attacks on Diplomatic mission during the Obama administration? Do you really? Do a google you will see there were. What makes Benghazi different? The lies and the sheer stupidity of allowing our ambassador in the country we just bombed the crap out of without proper protection. On top of that having him supply arms to the opposition sealed his fate. Then they lied.

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: ‘You Have To Prioritize Things’
Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things' | HuffPost




November 21, 2014

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.


Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.


....Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel.

The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.
House Intelligence Committee investigation debunks many Benghazi theories



Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say


In the month before attackers stormed U.S. facilities in Benghazi and killed four Americans, U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens twice turned down offers of security assistance made by the senior U.S. military official in the region in response to concerns that Stevens had raised in a still secret memorandum

Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say

I am never quite sure what side the person who posts this BS is on. Are you trying to make the case that there was good reason for Stephens not to be in Benghazi because his security was cut by Congress? Sure seems like that is what you are saying. Truth is, Stephens had no business being in Benghazi, except to supply weapons to the opposition.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Mmm, I hope it's true, but really this is no better then the speculation from the left as it's all "unnamed sources ".

You "think" the right wing infotainment complex would be so smart to put out deliberate fake news just to get their base riled up??? Nah

All of them do it.

Do you really believe that there were no other attacks on Diplomatic mission during the Obama administration? Do you really? Do a google you will see there were. What makes Benghazi different? The lies and the sheer stupidity of allowing our ambassador in the country we just bombed the crap out of without proper protection. On top of that having him supply arms to the opposition sealed his fate. Then they lied.

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: ‘You Have To Prioritize Things’
Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things' | HuffPost




November 21, 2014

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.


Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.


....Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel.

The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.
House Intelligence Committee investigation debunks many Benghazi theories



Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say


In the month before attackers stormed U.S. facilities in Benghazi and killed four Americans, U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens twice turned down offers of security assistance made by the senior U.S. military official in the region in response to concerns that Stevens had raised in a still secret memorandum

Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say

But who gave the order for the rescue team who was ready to go to 'Stand Down'?

 

[BlindBoo]

We know that Rice lied about Benghazi. What we don't know is how many protests and deaths that resulted because of those lies.

Two points of bullshit for ya. First, Ambassador Rice delivered the administrations talking points and did not lie. Second is she delivered the talking points on the 16th, the deadly riots had already spread.

When America was attacked on 9-11 Democrats joined Republicans and supported President Bush to show our enemies that were united against them. When we were attacked in 2012, as the riots were spreading and becoming more violent, the Republicans used it as a platform to attack the Democrats. United we stand, divided we fall. The KGB took full advantage of the Republicans willingness to divide this country. Once divided, you know what comes next.

No one in their right mind still believes Rice didn't mislead America and the world. She repeated the lie that lead to more riots, whether it was her saying the lie or Obama or Hillary that can be argued. But what we know is that prior to Benghazi, and the lies that followed, there was ONE peaceful protest. Clue for YOU, Benghazi didn't happen over a video, Rice, Obama and Hillary all lied to you and the world that is beyond doubt.

As far as I know, Bush never lied about 9/11. As far as I know Bush didn't allow the twin towers to be in harms way then lie about it.

They lied, they all lied, that is what make Benghazi different. That and it was all about gun running.

Susan Rice has long history of lying to cover for Obama

From your link.

Four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens and two U.S. Navy SEALs, lost their lives in the attack, which Rice blamed on “a hateful and offensive video that was widely disseminated throughout the Arab and Muslim world.” Five days later, she went on five Sunday TV news programs and falsely claimed the Benghazi attack was a “spontaneous reaction” to the “hateful and offensive video.”

When you examine the transcript, the conversation was not about the attack in Benghazi but about the riots in other parts of the world.

GREGORY: The images as you well know are jarring to Americans watching all of this play out this week, and we’ll share the map of all of this turmoil with our viewers to show the scale of it across not just the Arab world, but the entire Islamic world and flashpoints as well. In Egypt, of course, the protests outside the U.S. embassy there that Egyptian officials were slow to put down. This weekend in Pakistan, protests as well there. More anti-American rage. Also protests against the drone strikes. In Yemen, you also had arrests and some deaths outside of our U.S. embassy there. How much longer can Americans expect to see these troubling images and these protests go forward?

MS. RICE: Well, David, we can’t predict with any certainty. But let’s remember what has transpired over the last several days. This is a response to a hateful and offensive video that was widely disseminated throughout the Arab and Muslim world. Obviously, our view is that there is absolutely no excuse for violence and that-- what has happened is condemnable, but this is a-- a spontaneous reaction to a video, and it’s not dissimilar but, perhaps, on a slightly larger scale than what we have seen in the past with The Satanic Verses with the cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad.

When examining her answer for Benghazi the critics first and foremost must ignore her words when she said "First of all, there’s an FBI investigation which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired.

All they can do is focus on how they got it wrong about a protest forming at the consulate building when an "opportunistic extremist elements came to the consulate....... They came with heavy weapons which unfortunately are readily available in post revolutionary Libya. And it escalated into a much more violent episode. Obviously, that’s-- that’s our best judgment now. We’ll await the results of the investigation.

WND has a history of conflating facts to confuse their followers, knowing they rarely check facts like what was said, and in what context it was said.

September 16: Benjamin Netanyahu, Susan Rice, Keith Ellison, Peter King, Bob Woodward, Jeffrey Goldberg, Andrea Mitchell

 

[BlindBoo]

But who gave the order for the rescue team who was ready to go to 'Stand Down'?

Nobody. The only action that is similar is when the CIA station chief held his men back while he tried to organize more people and weapons to launch a counter assault. The rescue team arrived 30 minutes after the first report of the attack. It's all in the Congressional Report.

 

[JonKoch]

You "think" the right wing infotainment complex would be so smart to put out deliberate fake news just to get their base riled up??? Nah

All of them do it.

Do you really believe that there were no other attacks on Diplomatic mission during the Obama administration? Do you really? Do a google you will see there were. What makes Benghazi different? The lies and the sheer stupidity of allowing our ambassador in the country we just bombed the crap out of without proper protection. On top of that having him supply arms to the opposition sealed his fate. Then they lied.

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: ‘You Have To Prioritize Things’
Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things' | HuffPost




November 21, 2014

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.


Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.


....Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel.

The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.
House Intelligence Committee investigation debunks many Benghazi theories



Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say


In the month before attackers stormed U.S. facilities in Benghazi and killed four Americans, U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens twice turned down offers of security assistance made by the senior U.S. military official in the region in response to concerns that Stevens had raised in a still secret memorandum

Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say

I am never quite sure what side the person who posts this BS is on. Are you trying to make the case that there was good reason for Stephens not to be in Benghazi because his security was cut by Congress? Sure seems like that is what you are saying. Truth is, Stephens had no business being in Benghazi, except to supply weapons to the opposition.

NOW the right wing switches up the premise to the US mission where Stevens was at, should have been abandoned?


State Department Accountability Review Board (ARB) reported that Stevens went to Benghazi on Sept. 10, with plans to stay until Sept. 14, to “reconnect with local contacts,” as well as “fill the staffing gaps,” because a principal officer there had left, and “to open an American Corners [library for U.S. books and other materials] at a local school.”


.....Hicks indicated to the House committee that Stevens originally planned to go to Benghazi in October, but by going in September he might get fiscal 2012 funds to upgrade the Benghazi compound.


...Clinton said Stevens “believed that it was important for him to go to Benghazi. . . . He was someone who really believed strongly he had to get out there.”

Stevens was aware of the danger.
Benghazi was familiar ground for Amb. J. Christopher Stevens



Chris Stevens's Family: Don't Blame Hillary Clinton for Benghazi


"I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta. They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world. And their staffs were doing their best to provide what they could with the resources they had. The Benghazi Mission was understaffed. We know that now. But, again, Chris knew that. It wasn’t a secret to him. He decided to take the risk to go there. It is not something they did to him. It is something he took on himself." SISTER




Knowing Its Dangers, Chris Stevens Still Chose to Travel to Benghazi

 

[JonKoch]

You "think" the right wing infotainment complex would be so smart to put out deliberate fake news just to get their base riled up??? Nah

All of them do it.

Do you really believe that there were no other attacks on Diplomatic mission during the Obama administration? Do you really? Do a google you will see there were. What makes Benghazi different? The lies and the sheer stupidity of allowing our ambassador in the country we just bombed the crap out of without proper protection. On top of that having him supply arms to the opposition sealed his fate. Then they lied.

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: ‘You Have To Prioritize Things’
Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things' | HuffPost




November 21, 2014

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.


Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.


....Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel.

The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.
House Intelligence Committee investigation debunks many Benghazi theories



Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say


In the month before attackers stormed U.S. facilities in Benghazi and killed four Americans, U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens twice turned down offers of security assistance made by the senior U.S. military official in the region in response to concerns that Stevens had raised in a still secret memorandum

Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say

But who gave the order for the rescue team who was ready to go to 'Stand Down'?

ONCE AGAIN CUPCAKE:


November 21, 2014

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.


Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.


....Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel.

The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.

House Intelligence Committee investigation debunks many Benghazi theories