Breaking News..... Yes Hillary Clinton broke the law.

[Care4all]

Remember when W. Bush handed the banks $800 billion....

1. Congress controls the purse strings. If I remember right, this money was doled out in the last 2 years of the Bush administration. Who controlled Congress and those purse strings then? DEMOCRATS!

2. Remember when Obama and the Democrats passed the nearly $1 trillion failed Stimulus bill that contained over $7,000 pieces of DNC-ONLY Pork, contained millions for 'shovel-ready' projects that even OBAMA admitted did not exist, and ended up costing tax payers OVER $742,000 PER JOB Obama claimed to have 'saved / created' (even though businesses told how Obama had claimed to have saved more jobs than existed in their businesses)?!

Bush is credited with spending $800 billion and condemned by Liberals for wasting money...then Obama spends nearly a TRILLION, and Liberals say he did not spend enough!

Here, before you use that imaginary whip of yours, let me refresh your memory:

congress had no choice....

 

[OKTexas]

Indictment being handed down today?

Ken Cuccinelli just handed down his indictment, which is important, because if the FBI comes to a different conclusion, they will have to deal with the American people, and they can not incarcerate 100 to 200 million people, so they better figure this out, or face the wrath of America.

Interestingly enough, Cuccinelli cites no laws.

Maybe you can.

From the link: 18 USC §1924

 

[g5000]

Indictment being handed down today?

Ken Cuccinelli just handed down his indictment

 

[easyt65]

the muslim brotherhood is not a terrorist organization, nor have they been designated one...............

From the INTERNATIONAL SYMBOLS TERRORIST DATABASE:
"As of 2014, the organization has been declared a terrorist group both in Egypt and by its erstwhile ally Saudi Arabia, and is once again suffering a severe crackdown in Egypt as well as pressure in other Arab countries.

Its activities led to violent crackdowns by the governments of Egypt and Syria; it is banned in those countries. The group has influenced many terrorist leaders – including Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al Zawahiri – and many of its members have engaged in terrorist activities.

The Muslim Brotherhood no longer openly conducts terrorist operations; it is primarily a 'political organization' that supports terrorism and terrorist causes. Many of its members, however, have engaged in terrorist activities and the group has spawned numerous terrorist groups, such as Hamas and Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Terrorist attacks credited to the Muslim Brotherhood include:

• 2002: Suspected in suicide bombing in Grozny.
• 1979: Suspected in attacking Syrian military academy in Aleppo. 50 Syrian artillery cadets killed

U.S.-Related Activities
A document that has surfaced in the trial of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF), a charity long suspected of supporting terrorists by funneling money to Hamas and its officials, purports to outline a strategic vision of the future of Islamic work in North America. The document - An Explanatory Memorandum On the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America - appears to be the work of the Muslim Brotherhood. It is written by Mohamed Akram (Adlouni), an alleged Muslim Brotherhood official and one of many unindicted co-conspirators in the HLF trial. Some observers suggest that this document identifies a conspiracy by the Muslim Brotherhood to convert the United States to an Islamic nation. Other observers suggest that the document proves how several Islamic organizations are linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and are working together to achieve the goals listed in the document."

Obama and Valerie Jarrett, however, believe the Muslim Brotherhood is not only NOT a 'terrorist' group but even has associated members of this 'political organization' as 'Advisors' within his Cabinet.


Yeah, OBAMA says they aren't terrorists...he also said Nidal Hassan, after he perpetrated the Ft. Hood terrorist attack, during which he gunned down un-armed US military members while screaming out 'Praise to Allah', wasn't a terrorist either...just a 'un-happy worker' who perpetrated a case of 'workplace violence'.

 

[Campbell]

Another ridiculous "reading" of the law.

"If we don't like IT... Ya must ACQUIT!"

Thank you, Johnnie Cochran, for that highly enlightening, fact/evidence-based intellectual retort!

Well, you had Dick Cheney having heads of private oil companies in secret meeting with him discussing public policy. And part of the policy was to go to war with Iraq. Yet? Those meetings are deemed "protected" by "executive privilege." This was a policy that caused a massive amount of destruction and accrued great cost to this nation.
The last time a conservative bitched about that, was when? Exactly..

And Dick Cheney cleared a cool $25 million from his holdings in Halliburton while the fighting was hot over there. Seems to me that's a little more than pocket change.

 

[easyt65]

And Dick Cheney cleared a cool $25 million from his holdings in Halliburton while the fighting was hot over there. Seems to me that's a little more than pocket change.

Now now, don't get all pi$$y because the man has more money than you. BTW, How much did Obama 'clear' for arming the Mexican Drug cartels, for helping Al Qaeida take over Libya, for helping the Muslim Brotherhood take over the Egyptian Government, or running weapons to ISIS...oh excuse me - 'Syrian Rebels'...from Benghazi?

 

[boedicca]

This really isn't Breaking News. It's been obvious since the beginning of this Fracas that hiLIARy broke the law by having a personal server.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

not just the law, I guess she also broke her brain when she fell down those white house stairs over the last 20 years.

now we know why Hillary often said "I Dont Recall" regarding her scandals all thru the 90's,,must of been those falls down various staircases in the white house where she often landed on her head.

 

[SwimExpert]

Indictment being handed down today?

Ken Cuccinelli just handed down his indictment, which is important, because if the FBI comes to a different conclusion, they will have to deal with the American people, and they can not incarcerate 100 to 200 million people, so they better figure this out, or face the wrath of America.

Interestingly enough, Cuccinelli cites no laws.

Maybe you can.

No maybe about it little doggie

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

(a)
Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon, enters, flies over, or otherwise obtains information concerning any vessel, aircraft, work of defense, navy yard, naval station, submarine base, fueling station, fort, battery, torpedo station, dockyard, canal, railroad, arsenal, camp, factory, mine, telegraph, telephone, wireless, or signal station, building, office, research laboratory or station or other place connected with the national defense owned or constructed, or in progress of construction by the United States or under the control of the United States, or of any of its officers, departments, or agencies, or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being made, prepared, repaired, stored, or are the subject of research or development, under any contract or agreement with the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or with any person on behalf of the United States, or otherwise on behalf of the United States, or any prohibited place so designated by the President by proclamation in time of war or in case of national emergency in which anything for the use of the Army, Navy, or Air Force is being prepared or constructed or stored, information as to which prohibited place the President has determined would be prejudicial to the national defense; or
(b)
Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, and with like intent or reason to believe, copies, takes, makes, or obtains, or attempts to copy, take, make, or obtain, any sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, document, writing, or note of anything connected with the national defense; or
(c)
Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives or obtains or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain from any person, or from any source whatever, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note, of anything connected with the national defense, knowing or having reason to believe, at the time he receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain it, that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made, or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this chapter; or
(d)
Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(e)
Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(g)
If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy

Next moronic Democrat living in the delusion that Hillary Clinton is not ignorant.

The statute you cite has an all important caveat: "with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation."

Demonstrate where Clinton had such intent or reason to believe, and you will have demonstrated a violation of law.

 

[Bassman007]

Remember when W. Bush handed the banks $800 billion....

1. Congress controls the purse strings. If I remember right, this money was doled out in the last 2 years of the Bush administration. Who controlled Congress and those purse strings then? DEMOCRATS!

2. Remember when Obama and the Democrats passed the nearly $1 trillion failed Stimulus bill that contained over $7,000 pieces of DNC-ONLY Pork, contained millions for 'shovel-ready' projects that even OBAMA admitted did not exist, and ended up costing tax payers OVER $742,000 PER JOB Obama claimed to have 'saved / created' (even though businesses told how Obama had claimed to have saved more jobs than existed in their businesses)?!

Bush is credited with spending $800 billion and condemned by Liberals for wasting money...then Obama spends nearly a TRILLION, and Liberals say he did not spend enough!

Here, before you use that imaginary whip of yours, let me refresh your memory:

congress had no choice....

See you can't do anything but change the subject from the multiple laws that Hillary Clinton broke hum.

You silly girl..............

 

[Bassman007]

Indictment being handed down today?

Ken Cuccinelli just handed down his indictment, which is important, because if the FBI comes to a different conclusion, they will have to deal with the American people, and they can not incarcerate 100 to 200 million people, so they better figure this out, or face the wrath of America.

Interestingly enough, Cuccinelli cites no laws.

Maybe you can.

No maybe about it little doggie

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

(a)
Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, goes upon, enters, flies over, or otherwise obtains information concerning any vessel, aircraft, work of defense, navy yard, naval station, submarine base, fueling station, fort, battery, torpedo station, dockyard, canal, railroad, arsenal, camp, factory, mine, telegraph, telephone, wireless, or signal station, building, office, research laboratory or station or other place connected with the national defense owned or constructed, or in progress of construction by the United States or under the control of the United States, or of any of its officers, departments, or agencies, or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, or any place in which any vessel, aircraft, arms, munitions, or other materials or instruments for use in time of war are being made, prepared, repaired, stored, or are the subject of research or development, under any contract or agreement with the United States, or any department or agency thereof, or with any person on behalf of the United States, or otherwise on behalf of the United States, or any prohibited place so designated by the President by proclamation in time of war or in case of national emergency in which anything for the use of the Army, Navy, or Air Force is being prepared or constructed or stored, information as to which prohibited place the President has determined would be prejudicial to the national defense; or
(b)
Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, and with like intent or reason to believe, copies, takes, makes, or obtains, or attempts to copy, take, make, or obtain, any sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, document, writing, or note of anything connected with the national defense; or
(c)
Whoever, for the purpose aforesaid, receives or obtains or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain from any person, or from any source whatever, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note, of anything connected with the national defense, knowing or having reason to believe, at the time he receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain it, that it has been or will be obtained, taken, made, or disposed of by any person contrary to the provisions of this chapter; or
(d)
Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(e)
Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(g)
If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy

Next moronic Democrat living in the delusion that Hillary Clinton is not ignorant.

The statute you cite has an all important caveat: "with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation."

Demonstrate where Clinton had such intent or reason to believe, and you will have demonstrated a violation of law.

All one has to do is leave this info unattended and not secured according to established U.S. Government protocols, since Hillary did not do this, and in fact hid what she did from the U.S. government she is guilty. Read the entire thing this time numbnuts.............. 18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

Bye Bye Love.............

 

[SwimExpert]

All one has to do is leave this info unattended and not secured according to established U.S. Government protocols

No. You are positing negligence. Negligence is the antithesis of intent.

 

[Bassman007]

The continued denial coming from the Hillary Supporters and Left alike is simultaneously both funny and pathetically sad.

The fact that Hillary Clinton Violated the law, attempted to hide it, lied about it, and continues to do so could not be more obvious, as many legal experts have already repeatedly spelled it out for people. Here is only a SMALL SAMPLING of the LAWS she BROKE:



- 44 U.S. Code § 3106: Unlawful removal, destruction of records

- 18 USC Sec. 1924: Unauthorized removal and Storage of Classified Information - Penalties can include fines and imprisonment for up to one year.

- 18 USC Sec. 793: Deals with national defense information and people who misuse it to injure the United States or benefit a foreign power
-- 18 U.S. Code § 793(e) and (f): "Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information"

- 44 U.S. Code § 3101 & 5 FAM [Foreign Affairs Manual] 443.1: Federal Records Act; failing to keep copies of all government correspondence - Hillary declared she had turned all such correspondence over to the State Department. The FBI just proved she lied and did not.

- Executive Order 13526: RE - Classified National Security Information; This order prescribes a uniform system for classifying, safeguarding, and declassifying national security information, including information relating to defense against transnational terrorism.

These, of course, do NOT include the other charges that COULD be brought against her, such as:
- Perjury
- Obstructing a Federal Investigation
- Conspiracy


The SAD thing is the Liberals who respond to these given facts by claiming unless there are criminal charges filed, no such crimes were COMMITTED. This, of course, is completely WRONG!

While she has not been charged or found guilty of these crimes to date, the fact is that the crimes have already been committed have been proven. The case of Obama US Attorney General Eric Holder is proof that a lack of criminal charges and prosecution when the case includes extremely protected political entities.

Holder, as known, was caught perpetrating 3 Felony Counts of Perjury before Congress in his attempt to keep covered up the STILL on-going 'Fast and Furious' investigation in which the Obama administration provided thousands of guns and grenades to Mexican Drug Cartels. Despite being caught, President Obama and his Justice department refused to press charges against the man that continued to protect President Obama's 'backside'. Despite this criminal obstruction of justice, a UNANIMOUS, BI-PARTISAN Congress executed the only legal form of punishment still within their power, which was to CENSURE Holder. This made Holder the only US Atty General in US History to ever be Censured (for crimes), which will now and forever be part of the Obama Administration 'Legacy'.

DESPITE THE FACT THAT HILLARY HAS BROKEN THE LAW IS UNDENIABLE, NO ONE SHOULD HAVE ANY EXPECTATION THAT THE OUTCOME OF HER INVESTIGATION WILL BE ANY DIFFERENT THAN THAT OF ERIC HOLDER'S!

Yes, she broke the law.
Yes, it has been proven that she has been found to have surpassed the level of criminal activity required to prosecute General Patraeus...

HOWEVER...

- It would be a 'black mark' on the US to prosecute and jail an Ex-1st Lady

- It would be a 'black mark' on the Obama 'Legacy'

- Who knows what the Clintons have on Obama (We know she hired investigators to investigate and dig up blackmail information on the women who could potentially 'derail' their political climb / stay at the 'top')

...at the very LEAST, were Hillary to be charged, Obama would most assuredly 'Pardon' her. (The only shot there is for Hillary to go to jail is to drag the investigation out until he is out of office. If no charges are filed until AFTER he is out of office, there is nothing for him to 'pardon'...and I hate 'political' cr@p like that! It is obvious she broke the law. She should be treated like everyone else. She should be Charged. She will NOT be. Welcome to the '2 Americas'!)

Another ridiculous "reading" of the law.

It's funny how "strict" you guys get on folks not in your ideological group and how loose you become when folks are in it.

So the law needs to be read in a less strict manner because your shriveled old bag hero is involved. The law doesn't work that way, and neither will the grand jury that is currently investigating this.

 

[Bassman007]

All one has to do is leave this info unattended and not secured according to established U.S. Government protocols

No. You are positing negligence. Negligence is the antithesis of intent.

You are wrong, even if you are correct, because all I did is repost what the NY Post wrote, and also posted the Espionage laws that Hillary Clintoon broke.....

You can say forever that there is no grand jury about to indict her, but time will tell.. Don't hold your breath doofy, just go have another smoke.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

not just the law, I guess she also broke her brain when she fell down those white house stairs over the last 20 years.

now we know why Hillary often said "I Dont Recall" regarding her scandals all thru the 90's,,must of been those falls down various staircases in the white house where she often landed on her head.

i wonder if she ever landed on Monica and injured her perfect ass.

 

[LoneLaugher]

not just the law, I guess she also broke her brain when she fell down those white house stairs over the last 20 years.

now we know why Hillary often said "I Dont Recall" regarding her scandals all thru the 90's,,must of been those falls down various staircases in the white house where she often landed on her head.

i wonder if she ever landed on Monica and injured her perfect ass.

You really should insist that your comedy coach refunds your money.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

And to think there was once a time when they sent teens to jail for shoplifting.

 

[Campbell]

And Dick Cheney cleared a cool $25 million from his holdings in Halliburton while the fighting was hot over there. Seems to me that's a little more than pocket change.

Now now, don't get all pi$$y because the man has more money than you. BTW, How much did Obama 'clear' for arming the Mexican Drug cartels, for helping Al Qaeida take over Libya, for helping the Muslim Brotherhood take over the Egyptian Government, or running weapons to ISIS...oh excuse me - 'Syrian Rebels'...from Benghazi?

You're a liar!

Speaking of liars Cheney and the rest of the Bush regime told a documented 935 bare faced lies to gain support for an invasion of Iraq. They should be charged with multiple homicides and or war crimes:

Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war - CNN.com

 

[TemplarKormac]

And people take the "Fifth" to avoid fishing expeditions.

No. People plead the fifth when they know they've been caught. Basically an admission of guilt. Here you are defending someone who broke numerous federal laws.

 

[Care4all]

And people take the "Fifth" to avoid fishing expeditions.

No. People plead the fifth when they know they've been caught. Basically an admission of guilt. Here you are defending someone who broke numerous federal laws.

Yes, of course!

Our founding fathers wrote in to our constitution, the 5th amendment so all that are guilty can escape prosecution and jail of their crimes....

Is that what you truly think, is this what they taught you in school?