AmericanFirst1
Gold Member
- May 23, 2015
- 4,954
- 706
- 275
So in your feeble mind who is the criminal, hillary or obuthole?Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So in your feeble mind who is the criminal, hillary or obuthole?Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
I am glad to see you supporting the phony fuck obuthole and the bitch Hildawhore. Scum libtard.Sure they are, moron, so long as the police didn't break the law obtaining them.Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
I love the way you douche bags insist everyone is supposed to pretend they haven't seen what they have plainly all seen.
I'm glad to see you supporting invasion of privacy without cause. It's more proof what a phoney fuck you are.
Sure they are, moron, so long as the police didn't break the law obtaining them.Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
I love the way you douche bags insist everyone is supposed to pretend they haven't seen what they have plainly all seen.
I'm glad to see you supporting invasion of privacy without cause. It's more proof what a phoney fuck you are.
Sure they are, moron, so long as the police didn't break the law obtaining them.Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
I love the way you douche bags insist everyone is supposed to pretend they haven't seen what they have plainly all seen.
I'm glad to see you supporting invasion of privacy without cause. It's more proof what a phoney fuck you are.
I am glad to see you supporting the phony fuck obuthole and the bitch Hildawhore. Scum libtard.Sure they are, moron, so long as the police didn't break the law obtaining them.Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
I love the way you douche bags insist everyone is supposed to pretend they haven't seen what they have plainly all seen.
I'm glad to see you supporting invasion of privacy without cause. It's more proof what a phoney fuck you are.
I am glad to see you supporting the phony fuck obuthole and the bitch Hildawhore. Scum libtard.Sure they are, moron, so long as the police didn't break the law obtaining them.Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
I love the way you douche bags insist everyone is supposed to pretend they haven't seen what they have plainly all seen.
I'm glad to see you supporting invasion of privacy without cause. It's more proof what a phoney fuck you are.
Wow, such nasty language. What makes you NaziCons so mean and hateful?
I am glad to see you supporting the phony fuck obuthole and the bitch Hildawhore. Scum libtard.Sure they are, moron, so long as the police didn't break the law obtaining them.Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
I love the way you douche bags insist everyone is supposed to pretend they haven't seen what they have plainly all seen.
I'm glad to see you supporting invasion of privacy without cause. It's more proof what a phoney fuck you are.
Wow, such nasty language. What makes you NaziCons so mean and hateful?
Dealing with nasty piranha like you is what makes us "mean and hateful."
I am glad to see you supporting the phony fuck obuthole and the bitch Hildawhore. Scum libtard.Sure they are, moron, so long as the police didn't break the law obtaining them.
I love the way you douche bags insist everyone is supposed to pretend they haven't seen what they have plainly all seen.
I'm glad to see you supporting invasion of privacy without cause. It's more proof what a phoney fuck you are.
Wow, such nasty language. What makes you NaziCons so mean and hateful?
Dealing with nasty piranha like you is what makes us "mean and hateful."
I look forward to a more civil society. Hillary will bring us together.
"bring us together?"
Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
ROFL! Yeah, because this election is so harmonious and amicable?
How does a ruthless dirtbag "bring us together?"
Happy Birthday!!WAIT!!! Lakhota is a man? WTF?!!! I thought you were a woman (no joke). I'm not saying that to insult you, I really thought you were a woman.Some of you losers need to get on the right side of history.
![]()
So you're a man and supporting Clinton? Oh hell no man. Thats just fucked up. Men have no business supporting this woman. Support Elizabeth Warren if you must but Hillary Clinton? I can't beleive it. Do you wear skinny jeans, have a bad beard and get triggered by chants of "USA"?
Yes, I'm a guy - and I'll be 70 on Friday. It saddens me that you've never bothered to check out my avatar where my gender and age are clearly stated.
Proof is in black and white folks. Obama knew of Clintons private email server long before it went public. Lies under oath and nothing will happen. This info comes via WikiLeaks newest dump. The corruption continues........
‘CLEAN THIS UP’: Obama Had Emails From Clinton’s Private Account
Updated link courtesy of Kosh: WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails
Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
Sort of like when Bill Clinton said "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is."?Proof is in black and white folks. Obama knew of Clintons private email server long before it went public. Lies under oath and nothing will happen. This info comes via WikiLeaks newest dump. The corruption continues........
‘CLEAN THIS UP’: Obama Had Emails From Clinton’s Private Account
Updated link courtesy of Kosh: WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails
Your own link uses the term "may have".
[QUOTE="Kat, post: 15639377, member: 11635"
Ravi........I never saw where he said his daughter was a piece of ass......
Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
Care to bet?
"Bear Stearns Cos. Inc. hedge-fund operators were indicted on the basis of e-mail evidence they thought was private. White House appointees were embarrassed by Facebook posts. Lawyers in civil cases have made a cottage industry out of demanding and producing electronically stored information or “e-discovery,” which would include a dragnet exploration before trial of all e-mails in an adversary’s files."
Stolen e-mail evidence?
White v. White, 344 N.J. Super 211 (Ch. Div. 2001)
And a host of other rulings.
Face it clown boy, your candidate is a criminal. Nothing more, nothing less. The difference between her and any other person is she has fiends in high places that are protecting her. And you think that that is OK. Which makes you a scumbag.
Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
Leave it to a progressive......
We dont care what she does as long as she cant be prosecuted for it.
You MFers are sick!!