WaitingFor2020
Gold Member
- Banned
- #241
Want to quote the statutes or just keep insisting? Why do you think authorities have to obtain warrants in order to wiretap?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
BREAKING: Obama Lied Under Oath
- Thread starter cereal_killer
- Start date
Want to quote the statutes or just keep insisting? Why do you think authorities have to obtain warrants in order to wiretap?
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
Leave it to a progressive......
We dont care what she does as long as she cant be prosecuted for it.
You MFers are sick!!
the leftard is incorrect
criminally obtained evidence can be used in court
And the above endorsement is from the crowd that thinks registering their gun is a criminal invasion of their rights.
lol, too funny.
WaitingFor2020
Gold Member
- Banned
- #243
When will Assange be extradited back to Sweden to face both of his rape charges?
jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,369
- 1,130
Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
Leave it to a progressive......
We dont care what she does as long as she cant be prosecuted for it.
Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
Leave it to a progressive......
We dont care what she does as long as she cant be prosecuted for it.
You MFers are sick!!
the leftard is incorrect
criminally obtained evidence can be used in court
Want to quote the statutes or just keep insisting? Why do you think authorities have to obtain warrants in order to wiretap?
You MFers are sick!!
the leftard is incorrect
criminally obtained evidence can be used in court
Want to quote the statutes or just keep insisting? Why do you think authorities have to obtain warrants in order to wiretap?
you dumb fuckers are all the same
Evidence unlawfully obtained from the defendant by a private person is admissible. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect privacy rights, with the Fourth Amendment applying specifically to government
you should google it sometime so you dont look so fucking stupid
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
Leave it to a progressive......
We dont care what she does as long as she cant be prosecuted for it.
You MFers are sick!!
the leftard is incorrect
criminally obtained evidence can be used in court
And the above endorsement is from the crowd that thinks registering their gun is a criminal invasion of their rights.
lol, too funny.
These people are like silly putty, you can shape them any way you want with the right manipulation.
jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,369
- 1,130
Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
Leave it to a progressive......
We dont care what she does as long as she cant be prosecuted for it.
You MFers are sick!!
the leftard is incorrect
criminally obtained evidence can be used in court
And the above endorsement is from the crowd that thinks registering their gun is a criminal invasion of their rights.
lol, too funny.
man are you are a low functioning retard
the 4th amendment applies to the government
not private citizens
keep yappin your trap
you make yourself look even more stupid with each post
jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,369
- 1,130
Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
Leave it to a progressive......
We dont care what she does as long as she cant be prosecuted for it.
You MFers are sick!!
the leftard is incorrect
criminally obtained evidence can be used in court
And the above endorsement is from the crowd that thinks registering their gun is a criminal invasion of their rights.
lol, too funny.
These people are like silly putty, you can shape them any way you want with the right manipulation.
hey retard you are incorrect on the emails
they are admissible in court
jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,369
- 1,130
hey retards read up
Searches by Civilians and Police Agents
“[T]he protection of the Fourth Amendment . . . does not extend to searches conducted by private persons.”1 ivilians sometimes discover evidence of a crime and turn it over to officers. Usually it’s a weapon, drugs, stolen property, or some type of document. But whatever it is, officers seldom need to worry about how the civilian located it or whether it will be suppressed. That’s because, even if was acquired by means of an illegal search, it cannot ordinarily be suppressed unless it was obtained by a sworn officer or some other government employee.
http://le.alcoda.org/publications/files/NONPOLICESEARCHES.pdf
unless they worked for the feds it is admissible
Searches by Civilians and Police Agents
“[T]he protection of the Fourth Amendment . . . does not extend to searches conducted by private persons.”1 ivilians sometimes discover evidence of a crime and turn it over to officers. Usually it’s a weapon, drugs, stolen property, or some type of document. But whatever it is, officers seldom need to worry about how the civilian located it or whether it will be suppressed. That’s because, even if was acquired by means of an illegal search, it cannot ordinarily be suppressed unless it was obtained by a sworn officer or some other government employee.
http://le.alcoda.org/publications/files/NONPOLICESEARCHES.pdf
unless they worked for the feds it is admissible
jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,369
- 1,130
oh oh jabber jaws
no wonder you dummies will vote for hillary
your too stupid to think
United States v. Jacobsen (1984) 466 U.S. 109, 113 [“[The Fourth Amendment] is wholly inapplicable to a search or seizure, even an unreasonable one, effected by a private individual not acting as an agent of the Government or with the participation or knowledge of any governmental official
FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.
no wonder you dummies will vote for hillary
your too stupid to think
United States v. Jacobsen (1984) 466 U.S. 109, 113 [“[The Fourth Amendment] is wholly inapplicable to a search or seizure, even an unreasonable one, effected by a private individual not acting as an agent of the Government or with the participation or knowledge of any governmental official
FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.
HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
Leave it to a progressive......
We dont care what she does as long as she cant be prosecuted for it.
You MFers are sick!!
the leftard is incorrect
criminally obtained evidence can be used in court
Want to quote the statutes or just keep insisting? Why do you think authorities have to obtain warrants in order to wiretap?
The authorities didnt obtain the information illegally.
HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
Leave it to a progressive......
We dont care what she does as long as she cant be prosecuted for it.
You MFers are sick!!
the leftard is incorrect
criminally obtained evidence can be used in court
And the above endorsement is from the crowd that thinks registering their gun is a criminal invasion of their rights.
lol, too funny.
Sorry that we feel the need to keep a wildcard when it comes to government corruption,and after the last 18 wikileaks dumps it appears to be a wise decision.
HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
Proof is in black and white folks. Obama knew of Clintons private email server long before it went public. Lies under oath and nothing will happen. This info comes via WikiLeaks newest dump. The corruption continues........
‘CLEAN THIS UP’: Obama Had Emails From Clinton’s Private Account
Updated link courtesy of Kosh: WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails
Assange is being increasingly connected with Putin. You don't just drink the Kool-Aid, you're gulping it. Anyone can mock up an email in Photoshop.
Sorry thats already been debunked. Which is the primary reason you dont hear the DNC crying foul.
Interim DNC Chair Donna Brazile CAUGHT
GWV5903
Gold Member
Criminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
Yet they tell the truth...
Are you going to hang on to that?
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,163
- 47,312
- 2,180
"bring us together?"
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,163
- 47,312
- 2,180
Long after he has destroyed Hillary.When will Assange be extradited back to Sweden to face both of his rape charges?
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,163
- 47,312
- 2,180
Proof is in black and white folks. Obama knew of Clintons private email server long before it went public. Lies under oath and nothing will happen. This info comes via WikiLeaks newest dump. The corruption continues........
‘CLEAN THIS UP’: Obama Had Emails From Clinton’s Private Account
Updated link courtesy of Kosh: WikiLeaks - The Podesta Emails
Assange is being increasingly connected with Putin. You don't just drink the Kool-Aid, you're gulping it. Anyone can mock up an email in Photoshop.
Assange is connected with Putin only by douche bag Hillary drones like you. The rest of us haven't been fooled.
tyroneweaver
Platinum Member
Maybe hillary gave em the emailsCriminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
Scorpion
VIP Member
Must be why he's on ignore.......With a statement like that you're either wildly uninformed or severely brainwashed Lakhota. Have you no perception of the outlandish things you are saying?Lakhota are you even the slightest bit aware of how ridiculous you look defending her after all the info that has come out (via WikiLeaks and the corrupt FBI)? If you were smart you'd just ignore this topic all together and let it go. You cannot be this fucking dingy.To my knowledge, it was NOT illegal at the time Hillary was using her private server - but the rules were later changed to make it against the rules after she left the State Department. Can you provide any "credible" proof that it was illegal when Secretary of State Hillary was using her private server?
Going for a total make-over this time? The legality of the server isn't and never was the issue....it's what traveled to and from that server that proves she was trafficking in state secrets and selling access for speech money....oh and then obstructing justice and committing perjury multiple times under oath.
Funny. Where is your "credible" proof. Please provide it to the FBI.
That's hilarious considering who you're trying to defend. Hillary is a saint compared to Trump. I'm proudly voting for Hillary. Who are you voting for? Adolf Trump? Aleppo Johnson? Write-in? Not voting? None of my business?
NaziCons have cried "wolf" so many times against the Clintons that when a real "wolf" shows up - most sane people don't give a shit. I don't give a shit. NaziCons owe the Clintons many "get out of jail free" cards.
Dragonlady
Designing Woman
Maybe hillary gave em the emailsCriminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
Evidence of WHAT.
There's nothing there that would cause anyone to lose a moment's sleep. What exactly do you think you caught people saying?
tyroneweaver
Platinum Member
say what???????Maybe hillary gave em the emailsCriminally obtained emails are not admissible as evidence.
Evidence of WHAT.
There's nothing there that would cause anyone to lose a moment's sleep. What exactly do you think you caught people saying?
Similar threads
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 383
- Replies
- 1
- Views
- 161
- Replies
- 106
- Views
- 4K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 44
- Views
- 152
- Replies
- 76
- Views
- 351
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8487
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 481
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-