BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr...

[Moonglow]

Twitter ^ | 2 May 2019 | Jack Posobiec
"BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr today and is urging Nadler to push up his hearing to testify and correct the record as soon as possible - @OANN"

Think Mueller is just trying to minimize the time he will spend in prison for his part in the attempted coup.

Like the attempted coup by the republicans on the birther issue? Or when Oblama was called a liar during an address to Congress?

Obama was not transparent. He was devious and totally agenda driven on moving to the left. One comment by a Repub congressman sends you into distress. Nancy looked shocked. And yet she bandies insults around towards Trump and others on the Repub side like her mob family was selling drugs to African Americans back in Baltimore.

Nancy always looks shocked she's an octogenarian...Nancy is from the west coast and her family runs canneries for fish...

 

[The Purge]

I just love it watching our ABNORMALS get triggered almost to the point of RAGE....ROTFLMFAO

 

[edward37]

Purge teach your kids Russian They'll be needing it if you give Trump another 4

 

[edthecynic]

John Michael Posobiec III is an American alt-right internet troll and conspiracy theorist known primarily for his controversial and pro-Donald Trump comments on Twitter.

When you've got nothing . . . attack the source.

He is no source, he cited nothing and no one.

Ad hominem.

Cite a superior source then. One that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

'That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.'

- Christopher Hitchens

So you admit the witch hunt to frame Trump was Bullshit....

Now you are pulling a Barr!
I am admitting YOU are BULLSHIT!

 

[edward37]

OT

 

[edthecynic]

LIAR!
It was YOU who slobbered all over the report.
Now quote the ACTUAL words where Mueller said he agreed with the lying scum POS Barr.

Your Butt Hurt is so entertaining.....

I enjoy seeing you tards being smacked around with facts.

I notice you could not provide a single quote from the letter to back up the poster's LIE.
No surprise there!!!!

Hey Jackass..

We noticed you tards are guilty and full of shit...

Barr is going to burn your ass.....

Again you haven't been able to cite a single word from the letter to support the poster's lie.
Thank you.

Again....

You have been proven to be full of shit.....

If that lie was true you could quote the words that back up the poster's lie.
If you notice he gave up when challenged, but you are too STUPID to realize you are proving my point with each post where you fail to cite the exact words from the Mueller letter that support the poster's lie.
Thank you.

 

[edthecynic]

Barr himself said that he asked Mueller three times if he failed to indict based upon the silly notion that a sitting President cannot be indicted. Mueller replied no, three times.

You have only the word of proven liar Barr on that.

And as far as that "silly notion" read and learn something for the first time in your pathetic worthless life;
WHAT IS THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT POLICY?
In 1973, in the midst of the Watergate scandal engulfing President Richard Nixon, the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel adopted in an internal memo the position that a sitting president cannot be indicted. Nixon resigned in 1974, with the House of Representatives moving toward impeaching him.

“The spectacle of an indicted president still trying to serve as Chief Executive boggles the imagination,” the memo stated.

The department reaffirmed the policy in a 2000 memo, saying court decisions in the intervening years had not changed its conclusion that a sitting president is “constitutionally immune” from indictment and criminal prosecution. It concluded that criminal charges against a president would “violate the constitutional separation of powers” delineating the authority of the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the U.S. government.

“The indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would unconstitutionally undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions,” the memo stated.

The 1973 and 2000 memos are binding on Justice Department employees, including Mueller

You're pathetic bud. Barr has more integrity than you and all the Democrats in D.C., combined.

Now learn something about your justice department. POLICY is set by every AG who is approved to the post. This means that they can enforce or ignore any policy that is set internally.

The Special Council is directed on how to behave by an actual regulation, meaning a law.

Go back to doing whatever repulsive thing it is you do, and leave your betters alone.

So typical of the worthless lying scum Right, even after being exposed to the actual DOJ rules in detail, you lying scum POS just make up your own non existent rules and claiming it is a "LAW" that you can't cite.

But thank you for being STUPID enough to admit it is lying scum Barr's POLICY that prevents Tramp from being indicted.

So much Butt Hurt.....

This is why we love President Donald J. Trump....

He has shoved all of your lying resistance up your Tard asses...

Just as Donald Jackass Tramp loves you fools because you are sooooo STUPID!

 

[Deno]

When you've got nothing . . . attack the source.

He is no source, he cited nothing and no one.

Ad hominem.

Cite a superior source then. One that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

'That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.'

- Christopher Hitchens

So you admit the witch hunt to frame Trump was Bullshit....

Now you are pulling a Barr!
I am admitting YOU are BULLSHIT!

You quoted Christopher Hitchens.

That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.

That describes the Trump witch hunt you Tards put on to a tee...........

You said it yourself...

You admitted You and all your nut job tard buds are full of Shit...….

 

[Deno]

Your Butt Hurt is so entertaining.....

I enjoy seeing you tards being smacked around with facts.

I notice you could not provide a single quote from the letter to back up the poster's LIE.
No surprise there!!!!

Hey Jackass..

We noticed you tards are guilty and full of shit...

Barr is going to burn your ass.....

Again you haven't been able to cite a single word from the letter to support the poster's lie.
Thank you.

Again....

You have been proven to be full of shit.....

If that lie was true you could quote the words that back up the poster's lie.
If you notice he gave up when challenged, but you are too STUPID to realize you are proving my point with each post where you fail to cite the exact words from the Mueller letter that support the poster's lie.
Thank you.

Try and prove it's not true Tard...….

You can't...

 

[Deno]

Barr himself said that he asked Mueller three times if he failed to indict based upon the silly notion that a sitting President cannot be indicted. Mueller replied no, three times.

You have only the word of proven liar Barr on that.

And as far as that "silly notion" read and learn something for the first time in your pathetic worthless life;
WHAT IS THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT POLICY?
In 1973, in the midst of the Watergate scandal engulfing President Richard Nixon, the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel adopted in an internal memo the position that a sitting president cannot be indicted. Nixon resigned in 1974, with the House of Representatives moving toward impeaching him.

“The spectacle of an indicted president still trying to serve as Chief Executive boggles the imagination,” the memo stated.

The department reaffirmed the policy in a 2000 memo, saying court decisions in the intervening years had not changed its conclusion that a sitting president is “constitutionally immune” from indictment and criminal prosecution. It concluded that criminal charges against a president would “violate the constitutional separation of powers” delineating the authority of the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the U.S. government.

“The indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would unconstitutionally undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions,” the memo stated.

The 1973 and 2000 memos are binding on Justice Department employees, including Mueller

You're pathetic bud. Barr has more integrity than you and all the Democrats in D.C., combined.

Now learn something about your justice department. POLICY is set by every AG who is approved to the post. This means that they can enforce or ignore any policy that is set internally.

The Special Council is directed on how to behave by an actual regulation, meaning a law.

Go back to doing whatever repulsive thing it is you do, and leave your betters alone.

So typical of the worthless lying scum Right, even after being exposed to the actual DOJ rules in detail, you lying scum POS just make up your own non existent rules and claiming it is a "LAW" that you can't cite.

But thank you for being STUPID enough to admit it is lying scum Barr's POLICY that prevents Tramp from being indicted.

So much Butt Hurt.....

This is why we love President Donald J. Trump....

He has shoved all of your lying resistance up your Tard asses...

Just as Donald Jackass Tramp loves you fools because you are sooooo STUPID!

You are Sooooo Butt Hurt.....

It makes me happy happy happy......

Trump has skunked you Tards at every turn....

Can't wait til 20..........

 

[Deno]

OT

Another Tard fighting for women......

You Tards are soooo full of Shit.....

 

[TemplarKormac]

Twitter ^ | 2 May 2019 | Jack Posobiec
"BREAKING: Special Counsel Mueller “deeply disturbed” by Pelosi accusations against AG Barr today and is urging Nadler to push up his hearing to testify and correct the record as soon as possible - @OANN"

Think Mueller is just trying to minimize the time he will spend in prison for his part in the attempted coup.

Like the attempted coup by the republicans on the birther issue? Or when Oblama was called a liar during an address to Congress?

Interestingly, it isn't okay for either side to try and overthrow a sitting president via political gamesmanship or call him names during a State of the Union address. You are suggesting that if Obama was deserving of respect and the benefit of the doubt as a president, that Trump as a sitting president deserves the same kind of respect and benefit of the doubt. That seems to be lost on some people in this thread.

Oh please, don't tell me this only works one way. Don't be predictable, Moonie.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Nunes smells a rat

HIMSELF!

Charming.

What grade are you in?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Jack Posobiec

John Michael Posobiec III is an American alt-right internet troll and conspiracy theorist known primarily for his controversial and pro-Donald Trump comments on Twitter.

When you've got nothing . . . attack the source.

He is no source, he cited nothing and no one.

Ad hominem.

Cite a superior source then. One that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

'That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.'

- Christopher Hitchens

Red herring.

Cite a superior source, one that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

The burden of proof is on you now.

If you ever want to set yourself apart from the idiots in this world, you do that by combating fake news and fake facts with actual facts and actual evidence.

But you like to play the same game you criticize your counterparts for doing.

Christopher Hitchens couldn't be more wrong.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Jack Posobiec

John Michael Posobiec III is an American alt-right internet troll and conspiracy theorist known primarily for his controversial and pro-Donald Trump comments on Twitter.

You beat me to it. Good work. He's just another insane trump bootlicker just like purge

Curious... whose boots are you licking right now?

Unlike you, I don't lick anybody's boots, asshole.

Yeah, as if that couldn't be a more obvious lie. When you subscribe to that far left wing bullshit, you are licking boots. When you repeat their slogans and hashtags, you are licking their boots. A sheep in wolf's clothing.

You aren't unique. You're one of many on both sides blinded by pure bias and political hatred.

But I'm an asshole?

Intriguing...

 

[edthecynic]

He is no source, he cited nothing and no one.

Ad hominem.

Cite a superior source then. One that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

'That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.'

- Christopher Hitchens

So you admit the witch hunt to frame Trump was Bullshit....

Now you are pulling a Barr!
I am admitting YOU are BULLSHIT!

You quoted Christopher Hitchens.

That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.

That describes the Trump witch hunt you Tards put on to a tee...........

You said it yourself...

You admitted You and all your nut job tard buds are full of Shit...….

No, it describes the OP and everything that comes out of the lying scum mouth of the POS Tramp.

 

[edthecynic]

Cite a superior source, one that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

Cite the name of the PO's source!

 

[TemplarKormac]

Jack Posobiec

John Michael Posobiec III is an American alt-right internet troll and conspiracy theorist known primarily for his controversial and pro-Donald Trump comments on Twitter.

When you've got nothing . . . attack the source.

He is no source, he cited nothing and no one.

Ad hominem.

Cite a superior source then. One that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

'That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.'

- Christopher Hitchens

Moreover... you cut the legs out from under your own premise by citing this quote.

Either there was evidence, provable evidence, or there wasn't. You cannot make baseless claims and prove them with baseless evidence.

 

[edthecynic]

You have only the word of proven liar Barr on that.

And as far as that "silly notion" read and learn something for the first time in your pathetic worthless life;
WHAT IS THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT POLICY?
In 1973, in the midst of the Watergate scandal engulfing President Richard Nixon, the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel adopted in an internal memo the position that a sitting president cannot be indicted. Nixon resigned in 1974, with the House of Representatives moving toward impeaching him.

“The spectacle of an indicted president still trying to serve as Chief Executive boggles the imagination,” the memo stated.

The department reaffirmed the policy in a 2000 memo, saying court decisions in the intervening years had not changed its conclusion that a sitting president is “constitutionally immune” from indictment and criminal prosecution. It concluded that criminal charges against a president would “violate the constitutional separation of powers” delineating the authority of the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the U.S. government.

“The indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would unconstitutionally undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions,” the memo stated.

The 1973 and 2000 memos are binding on Justice Department employees, including Mueller

You're pathetic bud. Barr has more integrity than you and all the Democrats in D.C., combined.

Now learn something about your justice department. POLICY is set by every AG who is approved to the post. This means that they can enforce or ignore any policy that is set internally.

The Special Council is directed on how to behave by an actual regulation, meaning a law.

Go back to doing whatever repulsive thing it is you do, and leave your betters alone.

So typical of the worthless lying scum Right, even after being exposed to the actual DOJ rules in detail, you lying scum POS just make up your own non existent rules and claiming it is a "LAW" that you can't cite.

But thank you for being STUPID enough to admit it is lying scum Barr's POLICY that prevents Tramp from being indicted.

So much Butt Hurt.....

This is why we love President Donald J. Trump....

He has shoved all of your lying resistance up your Tard asses...

Just as Donald Jackass Tramp loves you fools because you are sooooo STUPID!

You are Sooooo Butt Hurt.....

It makes me happy happy happy......

Trump has skunked you Tards at every turn....

Can't wait til 20..........

You are nothing but a dumb SUCKER to the worthless lying scum POS Tramp.
SUCKER!

 

[edthecynic]

John Michael Posobiec III is an American alt-right internet troll and conspiracy theorist known primarily for his controversial and pro-Donald Trump comments on Twitter.

When you've got nothing . . . attack the source.

He is no source, he cited nothing and no one.

Ad hominem.

Cite a superior source then. One that can reliably contradict his.

Or stop insulting the OP.

'That which can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.'

- Christopher Hitchens

Moreover... you cut the legs out from under your own premise by citing this quote.

Either there was evidence, provable evidence, or there wasn't. You cannot make baseless claims and prove them with baseless evidence.

The OP had NO evidence, so I need no evidence to dismiss it, and YOU.