Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lets say a POTUS is sitting in the White House and they choose to call the SOS of a state and ask them to find a very specific number of votes. Would that be in his official capacity?
Let me cure your wrong belief.You seem to not understand what impeachment is.
This is true, but that’s because conservatives support the rule of lawHahaha
Comedy gold
Thanks
If it were, the GOP would have stacked it already
This court is a blowjob to conservatives
Its really simple a president can't rob a bank.I'm failing to see how she's wrong. I have thought for a while that the office of the Presidency was quite literally above the law, as they are essentially the boss of the AG and the DoJ, with Biden being the perfect example. How many laws does this man have to break? In my mind, the SCOTUS ruling today confirms these suspicions.
I want your guy to endure precisely what Trump has had to endure.And thus the problem with this ruling, what is an "official action" becomes a matter of opinion.
This is what puts them above the law.
This is why you all will one day regret giving the POTUS basically unlimited immunity when it is not the guy you worship taking advantage of it
Guess again fool...deflection fail!counting alternate electors has happened before and not illegal,,,
Let me cure your wrong belief.
For impeachment to work as the Democrats want it to, they must get all 3 strikes. 2 are impeachment 1 is conviction. So far they keep failing.
That will be for the court to decide, then the appellate court, then back to SCOTUS again.
Trump will be POTUS by then.
View attachment 970117
He still wins....By a mile.Trump will be in a NYS prison long before.
Is murdering people part of the day-to-day job of the president?So it was legal when Obama murdered an American citizen with no due process?
That would be an “official act “That's not what SCOTUS just ruled. Even IF the Biden Admin. DOJ has been coordinating with Trump's various prosecutors the SCOTUS just ruled that's fine. Joe Biden has immunity for any conversations he may have with his AG and for any actions his DOJ may take against Trump.
For instance IF Trump should prevail in November and it is determined he cheated by having loyal MAGAts counting and certifying votes improperly at county and state levels across the country then Biden has authority to round them all up (including Trump) and imprison them for the sake of election integrity.
Wow...False equivalence much?At least we won't have to listen to MAGAts whining anymore about Joe "weaponizing his Justice Department for election interference" because the SCOTUS just ruled that's ok.
Completely acceptable and legal.
Totally different circumstances. Those were certified electors. These were notcounting alternate electors has happened before and not illegal,,,
DEATH TO DEMOCRACY,,,Anyone who is for rule of law and democracy can't possibly side with this ruling.
Okay but you quoted me--twice--that had absolutely nothing to do with abortion. No harm no foul though.During this thread abortion was brought up. I was addressing that.
no its not,,Totally different circumstances. Those were certified electors. These were not
At the time of Clinton there were Republicans who realized that perhaps Nixon was railroaded, and they joined in to remove him. The Progs were already corrupted at that time. Republicans found out about being flim flammed and it sucks as it takes a long time to forget if ever.So far they impeached FPOTUS45 twice. The Senate didn't convict, true.
Just like the GOP impeached Clinton and failed to convict.
WW
I never said anything about conversations,,,
its the act itself I was talking about,,
as for the alternate electors being counted,,
thats a legal precedent thats been done before and perfectly legal,,
counting alternate electors has happened before and not illegal,,,
