BREAKING: The Supreme Court is Likely to Uphold Presidential Immunity for Donald Trump..

[BackAgain]

Who Israel?

More than 10,000 children have been killed by Israeli airstrikes and ground operations in Gaza in nearly 100 days of violence

Source? Guessing it’s official. Hamas. Right?

 

[Curried Goats]

I don’t have Hamas running my town

And HAMAS isn't threatening all of Europe. It's barely able to threaten Israel. They only got caught with their pants down.

 

[struth]

And HAMAS isn't threatening all of Europe. It's barely able to threaten Israel. They only got caught with their pants down.

It's threatening all of Israel....

because Israel isn't majority white they can't defend themselves?

Typical

 

[Curried Goats]

It's threatening all of Israel....

because Israel isn't majority white they can't defend themselves?

Typical

Rhetoric isn't the same as capability. If you're standing on the street corner and an unarmed naked man 100 feet from you threatens to shoot you, that isn't a threat that requires you to kill 10,000 innocent children to mitigate. You understand the concept of proportional force, right?

 

[scruffy]

Newsflash

Every President IS and always has been subject to prosecution if they break the law

See … Nixon

Nixon was prosecuted?

Do tell!

Leftards sure have a vivid imagination.

 

[OKTexas]

What "due process?"

Trump's claim. A claim that, funnily enough nobody serious I've seen seems to be willing to defend on merit, just on process. This includes the members of SCOTUS who avoid the specifics of this case like it has koodies. Is that a president can do whatever he wants as long as the act itself fits in the widest possible interpretation of official duties.

This speaks in my view to his believe in his own innocence. And to the absolute cult like grip he has on the GOP electorate, who have no problem with a president who flat out says he's de facto above the law

My comment was about xiden, go back and read the post I responded to.

.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

In a court of law, you are innocent until proven guilty
In the court of public opinion…..Trump is guilty

Let's hope we get a decent honest jury....

 

[struth]

Rhetoric isn't the same as capability. If you're standing on the street corner and an unarmed naked man 100 feet from you threatens to shoot you, that isn't a threat that requires you to kill 10,000 innocent children to mitigate. You understand the concept of proportional force, right?

I didn't say it was.


but Hamas isn't an unarmed naked man.....they are the elected govt of Gaza, and they repeated attack Israel, in fact just recently they invaded and carried out the largest slaugther of Jewish people since the National Socialist....so you are comparison is pathetical stupid

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

The fact is the SCOTUS has watched as Democrats weaponized the law to GET TRUMP using whatever cooked up convoluted charge they could fabricate. More than one SCOTUS justice as much as said so in oral arguments yesterday. While most of the justices slapped down the governments attorney multiple times for trying to frame this as about Trump, the justices whacked him saying no this is about all the future presidents and legal persecution by their opponents.

Dems you assholes screwed the pooch with all your lawfare.

EXACALAKALLY!

 

[Lesh]

Nixon was prosecuted?

Do tell!

Leftards sure have a vivid imagination.

Nixon was given a pardon. Obviously because he was LIABLE to be prosecuted

 

[struth]

Nixon was given a pardon. Obviously because he was LIABLE to be prosecuted

maybe, we will never know....because he was given a pardon

 

[Curried Goats]

I didn't say it was.


but Hamas isn't an unarmed naked man.....they are the elected govt of Gaza, and they repeated attack Israel, in fact just recently they invaded and carried out the largest slaugther of Jewish people since the National Socialist....so you are comparison is pathetical stupid

Calling them the elected government of Gaza isn't saying anything about their capabilities. Do you honestly believe HAMAS has the ability to destroy Israel? It doesn't even the power to secure its own statehood.

 

[beagle9]

Rhetoric isn't the same as capability. If you're standing on the street corner and an unarmed naked man 100 feet from you threatens to shoot you, that isn't a threat that requires you to kill 10,000 innocent children to mitigate. You understand the concept of proportional force, right?

Wow, what a stretch trying to make some kind of ridiculous point.... unbelievable..

 

[Curried Goats]

It's war, and the enemy

Wow, what a stretch trying to make some kind of ridiculous point.... unbelievable..

The ridiculous point is that any response to any threat, no matter how big or small, is ok. Well if that's the case what separates you ideologically from HAMAS?

 

[d0gbreath]

Should SCOTUS grant US presidents total immunity, I'm running in '28. I'll only be 72 then, kind of a refreshing younger candidate.

 

[struth]

Calling them the elected government of Gaza isn't saying anything about their capabilities. Do you honestly believe HAMAS has the ability to destroy Israel? It doesn't even the power to secure its own statehood.

They have the capability to commit mass murder and rape.

They committed the largest slaughter of Jews since the national socialist

I fail to see your point

 

[Curried Goats]

They have the capability to commit mass murder and rape.

They committed the largest slaughter of Jews since the national socialist

I fail to see your point

You're suggesting here that mass murder and rape of innocent civilians is a bad thing? Yes? How many did HAMAS kill on October 7th? Around 1200? Since then the IDF has killed 10,000 innocent children in their hunt for HAMAS. Is that bad? Or are you arguing any response is okay? Because you see how the latter could also be used by HAMAS to justify their attack.... right? It's circular logic that begets more and more violence.

 

[struth]

You're suggesting here that mass murder and rape of innocent civilians is a bad thing? Yes? How many did HAMAS kill on October 7th? Around 1200? Since then the IDF has killed 10,000 innocent children in their hunt for HAMAS. Is that bad? Or are you arguing any response is okay? Because you see how the latter could also be used by HAMAS to justify their attack.... right? It's circular logic that begets more and more violence.

Yes hamas is horrible for using human shields

What’s even more disgusting is the dembots here defending them

 

[Curried Goats]

Yes hamas is horrible for using human shields

What’s even more disgusting is the dembots here defending them

I'm not defending the use of human shields. That's you being too much of a brittle bitch to voice your support for shooting through those human shields with any kind of confidence or pride. Instead we get this weak ass make believe shit.

 

[DudleySmith]

I didn't say it was.


but Hamas isn't an unarmed naked man.....they are the elected govt of Gaza, and they repeated attack Israel, in fact just recently they invaded and carried out the largest slaugther of Jewish people since the National Socialist....so you are comparison is pathetical stupid

They also get major logistical support from the UN and arab countries as well as Iran. The 'poor helpless innocent refugees' gimmick has always been bullshit.