Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That is your dear leader.A precedent has already been set for Trump to just ignore laws(immigration, Supreme Court rulings, etc) and do as his wishes and sic his DOJ on his political opponents via corrupt AGs and DTs around the country. Why stop at at one day? Oh wait, someone it is different when Biden does it.
It's actually funny to see people who clearly haven't got the slightest idea what we were talking about claiming we are wrong.No one is defeated by your frail fantasy. When you strip away the make believe the reality is we're watching you LARP in the park. We didn't even mention Trump. Our conversation was in general about any President hiding behind his attorney General to immunize himself from prosecution. It doesn't even apply to this case because as shady as Bill Barr was even he advised Trump against the fake electors scheme.
Listen to this! See what you think. This is what he thinks likely will happen..
BREAKING: The Supreme Court is Likely to Uphold Presidential Immunity for Donald Trump
I don't know where you came up with that, but you should change the channel. The Supreme Court does not issue jury instructions. That is for the trial judge.But the three liberals could join Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts, the most skeptical of the other five conservatives, and send the case back to trial with jury instructions limiting how the prosecution could use certain official acts in their case. That would allow the election interference case to go forward quickly.
Great, but speed it up. Anyone who knows what they are talking about and being honest knows this is a stall tactic. Delay, delay delay till maybe go away.I don't know where you came up with that, but you should change the channel. The Supreme Court does not issue jury instructions. That is for the trial judge.
The SCOTUS looks beyond the instant case. The decision will provide guidance to the lower courts on how to treat any criminal charge for conduct while in office- for all former Presidents, not just Trump.
My computer controlled weapons will have something to say about it, when the time comes.The SC is the very last thing preventing totalitarianism.
It's not a stall tactic, it's a situation that has never happened before. There is no Constitutional text or case law to rely on, that would easily settle the question.Great, but speed it up. Anyone who knows what they are talking about and being honest knows this is a stall tactic. Delay, delay delay till maybe go away.
You are stupid and have no clue what’s going onSo if they rule immunity, the Biden can get the DOJ to imprison Trump immediately.
“Go back to the plantation..”You are stupid and have no clue what’s going on
Go back to the plantation and let the grown ups handle this
NewsflashIt's not a stall tactic, it's a situation that has never happened before. There is no Constitutional text or case law to rely on, that would easily settle the question.
It's not the court's job to provide you with instant gratification. You see only this case, but the court has to make a ruling that reaches beyond.
Or we will be in a place where EVERY former President is subject to criminal prosecution when he leaves office, and the POTUS becomes nothing more than a ceremonial position...
after theyve been impeached,,Newsflash
Every President IS and always has been subject to prosecution if they break the law
See … Nixon
^ fuckup’s analysis is fraudulent.What "due process?"
Trump's claim. A claim that, funnily enough nobody serious I've seen seems to be willing to defend on merit, just on process. This includes the members of SCOTUS who avoid the specifics of this case like it has koodies. Is that a president can do whatever he wants as long as the act itself fits in the widest possible interpretation of official duties.
This speaks in my view to his believe in his own innocence. And to the absolute cult like grip he has on the GOP electorate, who have no problem with a president who flat out says he's de facto above the law
Not a newsflash. It’s never been tried.Newsflash
Every President IS and always has been subject to prosecution if they break the law
See … Nixon
Are you being obtuse? I think so. Hey, I hope you hear Biden's interview on Howard Stern. What a great man. And for the record, he did work. He not only passed the bar, which is really hard, he was a lawyer for a few years. That's work. In fact he worked for rich Republicans for a minute and decided after that to go help poor people as a public defender.It's not a stall tactic, it's a situation that has never happened before. There is no Constitutional text or case law to rely on, that would easily settle the question.
It's not the court's job to provide you with instant gratification. You see only this case, but the court has to make a ruling that reaches beyond.
Or we will be in a place where EVERY former President is subject to criminal prosecution when he leaves office, and the POTUS becomes nothing more than a ceremonial position...
Don't you have a college campus to go to? Go show your support of the Jew killers....you are pathetic“Go back to the plantation..”
Yeah. We need to hear what racists like this asshead have to say
Really
Don't demonize the people who protest Israel's cruelty towards Palestinians. Israel's over reaction to the terrorist attack they suffered. At first we cheered as Israel went at them hard but now Israel is killing lots of civilians, being cruel, land grabbing, not letting journalists in. Everything we condemn Russia for doing in Ukraine. We need to condemn Israel too but we walk on egg shells.Don't you have a college campus to go to? Go show your support of the Jew killers....you are pathetic
Don't demonize the people who protest Israel's cruelty towards Palestinians. Israel's over reaction to the terrorist attack they suffered. At first we cheered as Israel went at them hard but now Israel is killing lots of civilians, being cruel, land grabbing, not letting journalists in. Everything we condemn Russia for doing in Ukraine. We need to condemn Israel too but we walk on egg shells.
Keep defending baby killers...you sick turd
