Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just because the prosecution agreed to allow convicted felon Trump to file this motion does not mean it is guaranteed to honor or even consider it.It was unlikely left out of the constitution, as The President was not supposed to be above the law. This is a new ruling from the Supremes with no basis in The Constitution, created whole cloth. The Supremes going completely of the reservation, creating law from the bench.
~~~~~~“Based partly on his time in the White House”
1. This will not be a drawn out motion. The judge will rule pretty quickly
2. Just being in the White House in no way means these acts were on any way “official”.
This will go nowhere and take very little time
You may have chosen a foe in the Scotus, that has become the permanent word of the god.It was unlikely left out of the constitution, as The President was not supposed to be above the law. This is a new ruling from the Supremes with no basis in The Constitution, created whole cloth. The Supremes going completely of the reservation, creating law from the bench.
Whte 6 knows the truth. He's actually said that the president was not supposed to be above the law.Just because the prosecution agreed to allow convicted felon Trump to file this motion does not mean it is guaranteed to honor or even consider it.
In fact it probably won't make a bit of difference other than going into the procedural record to bolster the case against Trump by demonstrating that his defense was given every opportunity available to plead his case.
I have not got one. And AOC is and always has been nuts.You may have chosen a foe in the Scotus, that has become the permanent word of the god.
Keep the faith and even consider AOC's way back at this time of great urgency and peril.
Mature Americans like you will be called upon in the coming few months to find a failsafe solution!
I think after this past week and today, it may be necessary to collect belts and shoelaces from the lefties.
LOL
New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg and his prosecution team have agreed to delay scheduled sentencing for former President Donald Trump on July 11 after the Supreme Court ruled Monday U.S. presidents have immunity for "official acts.” On Monday night Trump’s legal team filed a letter with Judge Juan Merchan to have 34 convictions in the case tossed out, citing the Supreme Court’s opinion.
"Although the Manhattan case does not center on Mr. Trump’s presidency or official acts — but rather personal activity during his campaign — his lawyers argued on Monday that prosecutors had built their case partly on evidence from his time in the White House,” the New York Times reports. “And under the Supreme Court’s new ruling, prosecutors not only cannot charge a president for any official acts, but also cannot cite evidence involving official acts to bolster other accusations."
I think after this past week and today, it may be necessary to collect belts and shoelaces from the lefties.
LOL
New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg and his prosecution team have agreed to delay scheduled sentencing for former President Donald Trump on July 11 after the Supreme Court ruled Monday U.S. presidents have immunity for "official acts.” On Monday night Trump’s legal team filed a letter with Judge Juan Merchan to have 34 convictions in the case tossed out, citing the Supreme Court’s opinion.
"Although the Manhattan case does not center on Mr. Trump’s presidency or official acts — but rather personal activity during his campaign — his lawyers argued on Monday that prosecutors had built their case partly on evidence from his time in the White House,” the New York Times reports. “And under the Supreme Court’s new ruling, prosecutors not only cannot charge a president for any official acts, but also cannot cite evidence involving official acts to bolster other accusations."
Millions of Americans just like you will be imagining a solution and they will be imagining the courage needed to uphold their Constitution from the darkness that could descend on America.I have not got one. And AOC is and always has been nuts.
Donald, you are truly a depressing person. I cannot say, I disagree with much of what you have said in this thread. But, yes. It supports a depressing outcome, we may have to live with, if it comes to worst case scenario.Millions of Americans just like you will be imagining a solution and they will be imagining the courage needed to uphold their Constitution from the darkness that could descend on America.
When you said that it wasn't supposed to be, you made it clear that you had to attend to completing your thoughts to finally understanding the inevitable.
I'm pretty sure your military isn't giving up with you.But, yes. It supports a depressing outcome, we may have to live with, if it comes to worst case scenario.
Because falsifying financial statements while paying for the silence of a pornographic film star in order to defraud the voting public is an "official duty?"
It was unlikely left out of the constitution, as The President was not supposed to be above the law. This is a new ruling from the Supremes with no basis in The Constitution, created whole cloth. The Supremes going completely of the reservation, creating law from the bench.
I can disagree with it if I want, as it is my privilege to have my own opinion. They are supposed to decide, based on the constitution, but did not, as it was not in the constitution, similarly to how Roe was not in the constitution, yet it was decided (making law from the bench) and took over 50 years to be kicked out by the Supremes, but was kicked out.Biden's DOJ demanded that SCOTUS rule on this quickly, so they did. Now that they didn't rule in Biden's DOJ's favor, now you complain.
It was based completely on the constitution AND based on past rulings. (see Nixon Vs Fitzgerald and Mississippi vs Johnson from 1867). Article 2 Section 4 states that a president may be "subject to prosecution" only when found guilty in an impeachment and removed from office." Trump was found innocent, thus he is immune.
We went 230 of our 235 years without prosecuting a former president for what he did while in office because we knew that the president had immunity for official acts. You CANNOT have a president constantly worried that something he does while president will be prosecuted years after he is out of office and the next administration decides he did something they don't like. Basically, the left's behavior against Trump these last few years necessitated the SCOTUS to make it clear that the president CANNOT be prosecuted for things he did officially while president. Had you just left Trump the fuck alone, we wouldn't have to have SCOTUS step in and spank the ass of democrats like this.
You do realize this protects your cho-mo-n-chief Biden too, right?
It was a very fair, right down the middle decision, good job SCOTUS. Immunity for official acts but not personal ones, sounds good to me.
I can disagree with it if I want, as it is my privilege to have my own opinion. They are supposed to decide, based on the constitution, but did not, as it was not in the constitution, similarly to how Roe was not in the constitution, yet it was decided (making law from the bench) and took over 50 years to be kicked out by the Supremes, but was kicked out.
This is just one of those "beware of what you ask for" or in this case "beware of what you decide" type things, due to the laws of unintended consequences.
I think after this past week and today, it may be necessary to collect belts and shoelaces from the lefties.
LOL
New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg and his prosecution team have agreed to delay scheduled sentencing for former President Donald Trump on July 11 after the Supreme Court ruled Monday U.S. presidents have immunity for "official acts.” On Monday night Trump’s legal team filed a letter with Judge Juan Merchan to have 34 convictions in the case tossed out, citing the Supreme Court’s opinion.
"Although the Manhattan case does not center on Mr. Trump’s presidency or official acts — but rather personal activity during his campaign — his lawyers argued on Monday that prosecutors had built their case partly on evidence from his time in the White House,” the New York Times reports. “And under the Supreme Court’s new ruling, prosecutors not only cannot charge a president for any official acts, but also cannot cite evidence involving official acts to bolster other accusations."
Since when is paying "hush money to a porn star" in any way an official act. Added to which, it was done BEFORE the election.
You can disagree with it all you want, and just like every other time, you're wrong. Case law has already been established that presidents had immunity. All the SCOTUS did was clarify it. They did not create law. Even CLINTON was shown to be immune in past case law.
Well, in what way is paying hush money to a porn star a felony?
Listen to the parrot reciting right wing talking points and bullshit.
Case law was the OPPOSITE. Under this ruling, Nixon could have stayed on as President, and not be charged with anything, much less impeached for corruption.
