Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 68,965
- 34,415
- 2,300
What’s your point?~~~~~~
Does this also hold true for Bush 43, Barry, and Biden, or only for Trump?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What’s your point?~~~~~~
Does this also hold true for Bush 43, Barry, and Biden, or only for Trump?
Impeached or not, Nixon would not have needed a pardon under this rulingWrong. You're an idiot. This ruling has NOTHING to do with impeachment. If you want to impeach a president for something, go for it. Where does this ruling say you cannot impeach a president? Oh yea, it doesn't. Because you're a fucking liberal, thus a fucking moron and have no idea what the ruling actually said. Stop watching PMSDNC and CNN and you might actually LEARN something.
Impeachment is not a legal action. It has nothing to do with the courts. If he's impeached and removed, THEN article 2 section 4 states he can be prosecuted for it. But not until then.
God you're a fucking moron.
Impeached or not, Nixon would not have needed a pardon under this ruling
Go tell Hillary, you dumb cvnt.When it's done is service to a conspiracy to defraud the voters in an election. Covering up true negative material about one candidate and publishing stories on the opposition which the publisher KNEW to be false, in the hopes of changing the outcome of the election, is election fraud, which makes the falsification of records to cover it up, a felony.
what were the "financial statements" dated? Did you add up the invoices? It was not equal to the NDA amount.Because falsifying financial statements while paying for the silence of a pornographic film star in order to defraud the voting public is an "official duty?"
NOTHING the Liberals did has had any effect on how POPULAR as our next president TrumpIt's looking like the "34 fELoniES!!!" the left fought so hard to manufacture may be tossed altogether.