NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
[
I asked you on one specific fact you claimed, that midwives performed abortions. Can you back it up or did you make that up?
Who cares?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[
I asked you on one specific fact you claimed, that midwives performed abortions. Can you back it up or did you make that up?
My oh my! You are really busy sweeping up after the messes made by The Donald!I simply searched youtube and copied the very first post under "Obama campaign rally" and "Trump campaign rally"Okay. As they say, let's go to the video tape!Actually, all you have to do is watch video tapes of Trump speaking to his loonies and Obama speaking to his
I'm not even wasting my time watching this. So you think the standard is:
- Find any one tape of Obama that doesn't show rabid support
- Find any one tape of Trump that does show rabid support
And draw a conclusion. My Gawd, the low bar liberals hold yourselves to
There is no conspiracy, no bias, no judicious editing.
It's only one data point and obviously you wouldn't have posted it if it didn't serve your purpose. Your link even says it's an election ad, you think they're going to show the lunacy in their own videos?
[
I asked you on one specific fact you claimed, that midwives performed abortions. Can you back it up or did you make that up?
Who cares?
Kaz will DEMAND you cite to what law made them legal. (and I'm not being sarcastic here.)Midwives certainly did. And gentlemen did not inquire. Abortion just wasn't on the Founders radar.That's because at the time the Constitution was written, it was a matter between physician and patient only.
I don't think doctors assisted with abortions back then, but in theory, sure. BTW, murder is State law, not Federal
Of course, at the time, and until the 1960s, any woman who gave birth out of wedlock was pretty much considered "ruined."
None of that contradicts anything I said. You got a link on midwives doing abortions then? I frankly doubt that
Abortions were legal at the time of the constitution's framing.
[
I asked you on one specific fact you claimed, that midwives performed abortions. Can you back it up or did you make that up?
Who cares?
Frank Sinatra's mother was a midwife, and performed abortions.
Do you understand it isn't a rights issue?Why do some of you keep bringing up gun rights?Jesus Christ. You don't have the right in a privately held event. Y'alls some thick headed fucks.The Select Service banning guns from the GOP convention is a good example of government decisions on gun rights. Lee Harvey Oswald carrying a gun to the Book Depository building is a good example of a private citizen making gun right decisions.
Well, pardon me, Ice. i was under the impression that that was this entire thread was about.....
Ice, do you know the title of the OP of this thread?
There is simply no way the the GOP was going to allow guns, and there is also no way that they are going to take the heat for not allowing guns. Blaming it on the Secret Service works well for them.
Make that just the President. Your slip is showing.My oh my! You are really busy sweeping up after the messes made by The Donald!I simply searched youtube and copied the very first post under "Obama campaign rally" and "Trump campaign rally"Okay. As they say, let's go to the video tape!
I'm not even wasting my time watching this. So you think the standard is:
- Find any one tape of Obama that doesn't show rabid support
- Find any one tape of Trump that does show rabid support
And draw a conclusion. My Gawd, the low bar liberals hold yourselves to
There is no conspiracy, no bias, no judicious editing.
It's only one data point and obviously you wouldn't have posted it if it didn't serve your purpose. Your link even says it's an election ad, you think they're going to show the lunacy in their own videos?
Saying that Obama supporters are just as rabid is "really busy sweeping up after the messes made by The Donald?"
You're busy blowing the black President
How so?There is simply no way the the GOP was going to allow guns, and there is also no way that they are going to take the heat for not allowing guns. Blaming it on the Secret Service works well for them.
Do you understand it isn't a rights issue?Why do some of you keep bringing up gun rights?Jesus Christ. You don't have the right in a privately held event. Y'alls some thick headed fucks.The Select Service banning guns from the GOP convention is a good example of government decisions on gun rights. Lee Harvey Oswald carrying a gun to the Book Depository building is a good example of a private citizen making gun right decisions.
Well, pardon me, Ice. i was under the impression that that was this entire thread was about.....
Ice, do you know the title of the OP of this thread?
How so?There is simply no way the the GOP was going to allow guns, and there is also no way that they are going to take the heat for not allowing guns. Blaming it on the Secret Service works well for them.
And supposedly they are allowing it in Texas.
Secret services word is law ? Who knew ! ?
Or maybe the GOP is putting it on them to avoid the hypocrisy of them banning guns at the convention .
[
I asked you on one specific fact you claimed, that midwives performed abortions. Can you back it up or did you make that up?
Who cares?
Frank Sinatra's mother was a midwife, and performed abortions.
Bendog said midwives did abortions in Colonial times. He can't back that up
I concealed carry into my bank every once a while, no problems there.Deflection noted...A gun free zone is an easy target for a criminal, too bad progressives can't figure that out. Progressives are not the sharpest knife in the drawer though, are they??The Secret Service shot it down. So it's a non issue. A liberal could easily sneak in.
So you admit that gun free zones are safer than gun free for all zones.
So you think open carry at your local bank makes it a safer place? You think that 3 guys walking into your bank carrying shotguns shouldn't cause a teller to hit the alarm?
lol, you are a classic.
That's no deflection. That is directly to the point. You want banks to be gun free zones. Therefore, 3 guys walk into the bank carrying shotguns,
they have the right to do so, and any bank employee hitting the alarm would be violating their rights.
My state lets business opt out of allowing concealed carry on their premises? Banks do. Does your state not allow opt out?I concealed carry into my bank every once a while, no problems there.Deflection noted...A gun free zone is an easy target for a criminal, too bad progressives can't figure that out. Progressives are not the sharpest knife in the drawer though, are they??So you admit that gun free zones are safer than gun free for all zones.
So you think open carry at your local bank makes it a safer place? You think that 3 guys walking into your bank carrying shotguns shouldn't cause a teller to hit the alarm?
lol, you are a classic.
That's no deflection. That is directly to the point. You want banks to be gun free zones. Therefore, 3 guys walk into the bank carrying shotguns,
they have the right to do so, and any bank employee hitting the alarm would be violating their rights.
I believe all states have that. You have to post a sigh though and I don't recall ever seeing such a sign on a bank. Or anywhere except court or schools.My state lets business opt out of allowing concealed carry on their premises? Banks do. Does your state not allow opt out?
Concealed Pistol Permits: South Dakota Secretary of State, Shantel KrebsMy state lets business opt out of allowing concealed carry on their premises? Banks do. Does your state not allow opt out?I concealed carry into my bank every once a while, no problems there.Deflection noted...A gun free zone is an easy target for a criminal, too bad progressives can't figure that out. Progressives are not the sharpest knife in the drawer though, are they??
So you think open carry at your local bank makes it a safer place? You think that 3 guys walking into your bank carrying shotguns shouldn't cause a teller to hit the alarm?
lol, you are a classic.
That's no deflection. That is directly to the point. You want banks to be gun free zones. Therefore, 3 guys walk into the bank carrying shotguns,
they have the right to do so, and any bank employee hitting the alarm would be violating their rights.
Thanks. That jogged my memory. We have had for a while a similar CC law. But the legislature then passed an open carry law, and you don't need a permit for open carry. But, businesses can post "no weapons allowed." I throws the CC law into a odd place. And it's result is people who continue to comply with the old CClaw now find themselves violating a new law that was intented to be pro gun.Concealed Pistol Permits: South Dakota Secretary of State, Shantel KrebsMy state lets business opt out of allowing concealed carry on their premises? Banks do. Does your state not allow opt out?I concealed carry into my bank every once a while, no problems there.Deflection noted...So you think open carry at your local bank makes it a safer place? You think that 3 guys walking into your bank carrying shotguns shouldn't cause a teller to hit the alarm?
lol, you are a classic.
That's no deflection. That is directly to the point. You want banks to be gun free zones. Therefore, 3 guys walk into the bank carrying shotguns,
they have the right to do so, and any bank employee hitting the alarm would be violating their rights.
Exceptions for carrying concealed
The permit is valid throughout South Dakota except in any licensed on-sale malt beverage or alcoholic beverage establishment that derives over one-half of its total income from the sale of malt or alcoholic beverages (SDCL 23-7-8.1); any county courthouse as defined in SDCL 22-14-22; or any elementary or secondary schools (SDCL 13-32-7). The permit is not transferable from one person to another (SDCL 23-7-8.3).
Do you understand it isn't a rights issue?