Bush calls for unity in a crisis......Trump makes it about him

[Faun]

The difference being that Trump only appeared guilty to those with TDS. OJ appeared guilty to the overwhelmingly majority of people. Even those cheering when he got off were not cheering because they thought he was innocent, but because they thought it was poetic justice given the perceived discrimination against black people in the courts.

Um, the jury found OJ innocent. Frankly, I think he did it, but the misconduct of the LAPD in this case created reasonable doubt.

Trump, on the other hand, was caught pretty much red-handed trying to get the Ukraine to smear Biden for him.

Obviously I meant the overwhelming number of people in the country thought he was guilty, not the overwhelming majority on the jury.

There was very, very little evidence against Trump, which is why there was such a partisan divide. Only those with TDS, and this includes RINO Romney, thought there was enough there to convict. Even if there would have been a clear quid pro quo, it wouldn't have mattered in a legal sense, so the entire thing was nothing more than a propaganda tool.

LOL

Yeah, very little evidence... except for that perfect phone call where he illegally solicited a foreign national to help him with his re-election campaign.

The only problem was, he didn't do that. The Ukrainian didn't even know there were "strings" attached to the aid. How can you have a quid pro quo when the other party doesn't even know they are on the hook? Logic was never liberal's strong suit.

Umm... the law doesn't state the other party has to be aware of the solicitation. Just asking a foreign national to help with the campaign is a violation of the law.

No one asked a foreign national to help with a campaign.

 

[Desperado]

George Bush made a call for the nation to come together in a time of crisis.
Trump mocked him and said....where was your call for unit while I was being impeached?

Trump rips George W. Bush after he calls for unity amid coronavirus outbreak

In a three-minute video shared on Twitter on Saturday, Bush urged Americans to remember "how small our differences are in the face of this shared threat."

"In the final analysis, we are not partisan combatants. We are human beings, equally vulnerable and equally wonderful in the sight of god," Bush said. "We rise or fall together, and we are determined to rise."

Both Father Bush and Son Bush is a were Globalist and wanted not only the US but the World to come together. Fuck them and their 1000 point of light

You voted for them, didn't ya?

The last Democrat I voted for was McGovern , and I have voted in every election since then.. Always going for the lesser of two evils.
The only problem with that is you are still voting for evil

 

[Faun]

George Bush made a call for the nation to come together in a time of crisis.
Trump mocked him and said....where was your call for unit while I was being impeached?

Trump rips George W. Bush after he calls for unity amid coronavirus outbreak

In a three-minute video shared on Twitter on Saturday, Bush urged Americans to remember "how small our differences are in the face of this shared threat."

"In the final analysis, we are not partisan combatants. We are human beings, equally vulnerable and equally wonderful in the sight of god," Bush said. "We rise or fall together, and we are determined to rise."

Both Father Bush and Son Bush is a were Globalist and wanted not only the US but the World to come together. Fuck them and their 1000 point of light

You voted for them, didn't ya?

The last Democrat I voted for was McGovern , and I have voted in every election since then.. Always going for the lesser of two evils.
The only problem with that is you are still voting for evil

LOLOL

So you would vote for either Bush this year had they been eligible, running [and alive].

 

[Desperado]

George Bush made a call for the nation to come together in a time of crisis.
Trump mocked him and said....where was your call for unit while I was being impeached?

Trump rips George W. Bush after he calls for unity amid coronavirus outbreak

In a three-minute video shared on Twitter on Saturday, Bush urged Americans to remember "how small our differences are in the face of this shared threat."

"In the final analysis, we are not partisan combatants. We are human beings, equally vulnerable and equally wonderful in the sight of god," Bush said. "We rise or fall together, and we are determined to rise."

Both Father Bush and Son Bush is a were Globalist and wanted not only the US but the World to come together. Fuck them and their 1000 point of light

You voted for them, didn't ya?

The last Democrat I voted for was McGovern , and I have voted in every election since then.. Always going for the lesser of two evils.
The only problem with that is you are still voting for evil

LOLOL

So you would vote for either Bush this year had they been eligible, running [and alive].

Republican Party, Libertarian Party, Constitutional Party Anyone but a Democrat,

 

[rightwinger]

By that logic, OJ didn't kill anyone. The evidence was clearly there, the system just refused to step up and deal with it.

The difference being that Trump only appeared guilty to those with TDS. OJ appeared guilty to the overwhelmingly majority of people. Even those cheering when he got off were not cheering because they thought he was innocent, but because they thought it was poetic justice given the perceived discrimination against black people in the courts.

Just like a black jury ignored all evidence to find OJ not guilty, a Republican Senate ignored all evidence and found Trump not guilty

I am pretty sure if I had said this, I would be accused of being a racist. I am not saying you are or that I necessarily disagree, but the double standard is glaring.

At any rate, the evidence against Trump was extremely little. Not only was there very little, it was all speculative. No comparison.

The evidence was quite clear. Trump demanded a personal favor in return for military aid.

The Republican OJ Jury chose to ignore it

Trump demanded a personal favor

Personal favor?

Doesn't the entire American electorate benefit when Democrat corruption is uncovered?

Nice try
There still hasn’t been any corruption discovered outside of Trump demanding personal favors

 

[DBA]

By that logic, OJ didn't kill anyone. The evidence was clearly there, the system just refused to step up and deal with it.

The difference being that Trump only appeared guilty to those with TDS. OJ appeared guilty to the overwhelmingly majority of people. Even those cheering when he got off were not cheering because they thought he was innocent, but because they thought it was poetic justice given the perceived discrimination against black people in the courts.

Just like a black jury ignored all evidence to find OJ not guilty, a Republican Senate ignored all evidence and found Trump not guilty

I am pretty sure if I had said this, I would be accused of being a racist. I am not saying you are or that I necessarily disagree, but the double standard is glaring.

At any rate, the evidence against Trump was extremely little. Not only was there very little, it was all speculative. No comparison.

The evidence was quite clear. Trump demanded a personal favor in return for military aid.

The Republican OJ Jury chose to ignore it

Trump demanded a personal favor

Personal favor?

Doesn't the entire American electorate benefit when Democrat corruption is uncovered?

Nice try
There still hasn’t been any corruption discovered outside of Trump demanding personal favors

Trump didn't "demand" anything. That is wishful thinking.

 

[rightwinger]

By that logic, OJ didn't kill anyone. The evidence was clearly there, the system just refused to step up and deal with it.

The difference being that Trump only appeared guilty to those with TDS. OJ appeared guilty to the overwhelmingly majority of people. Even those cheering when he got off were not cheering because they thought he was innocent, but because they thought it was poetic justice given the perceived discrimination against black people in the courts.

Just like a black jury ignored all evidence to find OJ not guilty, a Republican Senate ignored all evidence and found Trump not guilty

I am pretty sure if I had said this, I would be accused of being a racist. I am not saying you are or that I necessarily disagree, but the double standard is glaring.

At any rate, the evidence against Trump was extremely little. Not only was there very little, it was all speculative. No comparison.

The evidence was quite clear. Trump demanded a personal favor in return for military aid.

The Republican OJ Jury chose to ignore it

Trump demanded a personal favor

Personal favor?

Doesn't the entire American electorate benefit when Democrat corruption is uncovered?

Nice try
There still hasn’t been any corruption discovered outside of Trump demanding personal favors

Trump didn't "demand" anything. That is wishful thinking.

He demanded an investigation in return for military sales

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

By that logic, OJ didn't kill anyone. The evidence was clearly there, the system just refused to step up and deal with it.

The difference being that Trump only appeared guilty to those with TDS. OJ appeared guilty to the overwhelmingly majority of people. Even those cheering when he got off were not cheering because they thought he was innocent, but because they thought it was poetic justice given the perceived discrimination against black people in the courts.

Just like a black jury ignored all evidence to find OJ not guilty, a Republican Senate ignored all evidence and found Trump not guilty

I am pretty sure if I had said this, I would be accused of being a racist. I am not saying you are or that I necessarily disagree, but the double standard is glaring.

At any rate, the evidence against Trump was extremely little. Not only was there very little, it was all speculative. No comparison.

The evidence was quite clear. Trump demanded a personal favor in return for military aid.

The Republican OJ Jury chose to ignore it

Trump demanded a personal favor

Personal favor?

Doesn't the entire American electorate benefit when Democrat corruption is uncovered?

Nice try
There still hasn’t been any corruption discovered outside of Trump demanding personal favors

Trump didn't "demand" anything. That is wishful thinking.

He demanded an investigation in return for military sales

If Biden did nothing wrong, why should he fear an investigation?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And that's why Hillary and the DNC were charged for the fake dossier.

They didn't solicit a foreign power, or even a foreigner, there. Did you get confused again?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If Biden did nothing wrong, why should he fear an investigation?

Why didn't the DOJ open an investigation?

You don't actually have to answer with a troll response. We all know exactly why.

 

[Kondor3]

We are watching the Orange Baboon God unravel before our very eyes.

Slamming Dubya for delivering an admirable nonpartisan call for unity is merely a latter-day faux pas in an unbelievably long line of such missteps.

He is a grave liability and danger to the Republican Party, who are now suffering because of their servile submission to The Creature.

He is entirely unfit for his high office - in wwaaaaayy over his head - and the American public has come to understand that sad state of affairs.

 

[basquebromance]

we either love each other...or we all die

let's put it to a national referendum, my friends!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And that's why Hillary and the DNC were charged for the fake dossier.

They didn't solicit a foreign power, or even a foreigner, there. Did you get confused again?

They laundered their foreign election interference?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If Biden did nothing wrong, why should he fear an investigation?

Why didn't the DOJ open an investigation?

You don't actually have to answer with a troll response. We all know exactly why.

Why didn't the DOJ open an investigation?

They should.
Let's call Hunter to testify first.

 

[Kondor3]

we either love each other...or we all die

let's put it to a national referendum, my friends!

November 3, 2020...

 

[JoeB131]

Obviously I meant the overwhelming number of people in the country thought he was guilty, not the overwhelming majority on the jury.

You mean the people who heard the evidence every day for months? Those people?

There was very, very little evidence against Trump, which is why there was such a partisan divide. Only those with TDS, and this includes RINO Romney, thought there was enough there to convict. Even if there would have been a clear quid pro quo, it wouldn't have mattered in a legal sense, so the entire thing was nothing more than a propaganda tool.

Oh, please. The Senate refused to hear witnesses because they KNEW he was guilty. They just wanted it to go away. At least the OJ Jury had the decency to hear witnesses.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Obviously I meant the overwhelming number of people in the country thought he was guilty, not the overwhelming majority on the jury.

You mean the people who heard the evidence every day for months? Those people?

There was very, very little evidence against Trump, which is why there was such a partisan divide. Only those with TDS, and this includes RINO Romney, thought there was enough there to convict. Even if there would have been a clear quid pro quo, it wouldn't have mattered in a legal sense, so the entire thing was nothing more than a propaganda tool.

Oh, please. The Senate refused to hear witnesses because they KNEW he was guilty. They just wanted it to go away. At least the OJ Jury had the decency to hear witnesses.

Knew he was guilty. LMAO. Keep telling yourself that. We heard a billion witnesses in the House and the transcript. You’re grasping again.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Obviously I meant the overwhelming number of people in the country thought he was guilty, not the overwhelming majority on the jury.

You mean the people who heard the evidence every day for months? Those people?

There was very, very little evidence against Trump, which is why there was such a partisan divide. Only those with TDS, and this includes RINO Romney, thought there was enough there to convict. Even if there would have been a clear quid pro quo, it wouldn't have mattered in a legal sense, so the entire thing was nothing more than a propaganda tool.

Oh, please. The Senate refused to hear witnesses because they KNEW he was guilty. They just wanted it to go away. At least the OJ Jury had the decency to hear witnesses.

The Senate refused to hear witnesses

The House left some witnesses unheard?

 

[rightwinger]

By that logic, OJ didn't kill anyone. The evidence was clearly there, the system just refused to step up and deal with it.

The difference being that Trump only appeared guilty to those with TDS. OJ appeared guilty to the overwhelmingly majority of people. Even those cheering when he got off were not cheering because they thought he was innocent, but because they thought it was poetic justice given the perceived discrimination against black people in the courts.

Just like a black jury ignored all evidence to find OJ not guilty, a Republican Senate ignored all evidence and found Trump not guilty

I am pretty sure if I had said this, I would be accused of being a racist. I am not saying you are or that I necessarily disagree, but the double standard is glaring.

At any rate, the evidence against Trump was extremely little. Not only was there very little, it was all speculative. No comparison.

The evidence was quite clear. Trump demanded a personal favor in return for military aid.

The Republican OJ Jury chose to ignore it

Trump demanded a personal favor

Personal favor?

Doesn't the entire American electorate benefit when Democrat corruption is uncovered?

Nice try
There still hasn’t been any corruption discovered outside of Trump demanding personal favors

Trump didn't "demand" anything. That is wishful thinking.

He demanded an investigation in return for military sales

If Biden did nothing wrong, why should he fear an investigation?

If Biden did something wrong. Why would Trump have to extort an investigation?

 

[rightwinger]

Obviously I meant the overwhelming number of people in the country thought he was guilty, not the overwhelming majority on the jury.

You mean the people who heard the evidence every day for months? Those people?

There was very, very little evidence against Trump, which is why there was such a partisan divide. Only those with TDS, and this includes RINO Romney, thought there was enough there to convict. Even if there would have been a clear quid pro quo, it wouldn't have mattered in a legal sense, so the entire thing was nothing more than a propaganda tool.

Oh, please. The Senate refused to hear witnesses because they KNEW he was guilty. They just wanted it to go away. At least the OJ Jury had the decency to hear witnesses.

The Senate refused to hear witnesses

The House left some witnesses unheard?

Yes they did. Quite a few witnesses went unheard.
Trump refused to allow them to testify