Zone1 Calling/accusing other members "groomer"

[Dogmaphobe]

You know -- when Tommy rubs people's noses in the fact he is promoting indoctrinating children through the use of porn, I sure don't see any threats that he is dancing close to the edge and playing with fire.

Those threats are only given to those who OPPOSE this behavior.

This website has made a clear statement on where it stands on the subject. The fighting words are o.k. The reaction to them isn't.

 

[BackAgain]

Okay. My issues are:

1. I don't personally want to get involved with the police.

It’s generally a bad thing to get involved with the police (unless you’re a crime victim or are seeking to assist the cops in capturing some criminal)

2. If the guy's not a pedo then I will be charged with filing a false report.

If you accuse a random username on this Board, I fail to see how you have defamed the real person behind these usernames and avatars. Plus, if you say something incorrect or whatever, here, you’re not filing any police report.

3. As I already said, the legal system is corrupt. I don't trust it at all.

No it isn’t. It can certainly be subject to some corruption, such as the politicization of DOJ by some schmucks like Brandon and his merry band of shitheads.

But, by and large, albeit imperfect, our legal system is not corrupt — and it tends to be pretty good in how it works.

 

[Road Runner]

It’s generally a bad thing to get involved with the police (unless you’re a crime victim or are seeking to assist the cops in capturing some criminal)

If you accuse a random username on this Board, I fail to see how you have defamed the real person behind these usernames and avatars. Plus, if you say something incorrect or whatever, here, you’re not filing any police report.


No it isn’t. It can certainly be subject to some corruption, such as the politicization of DOJ by some schmucks like Brandon and his merry band of shitheads.

But, by and large, albeit imperfect, our legal system is not corrupt — and it tends to be pretty good in how it works.

Agreed with everything except the fact that if the legal system wasn't corrupt then why didn't they pursue the steal of the election 2020? And this latest stunt with the Democrats allowing China to spy on our military?

 

[BlueGin]

So there was a disagreement between mods. There will ALWAYS be disagreements between mods. Hopefully though, threads like this will help clarify things at bit more as to what is or is not an infraction.

They don’t. Because what mods SAY is not what they actually DO when situations arise.

 

[BlueGin]

Yes, I AM bringing it up on the open board so people can see the sort of shit you people pull.

NOBODY in this place should be targeted with threats that they will be burned for posts that are not violations.

Look, you can make this place as welcoming to people who want to sexualize children all you want. You can make it as hostile to those of us who oppose Child abuse all you want. It's your site.

Just don't play this game where you are denying the targeted nature of the posts you are removing, o.k.?

Removing or out and out ignoring.

 

[BlueGin]

You don't object when it's hetero. But that's for another thread.

You are full of shit.

 

[miketx]

We aren't protecting anyone. Context is the key, always has been. You wouldn't go around calling someone a thief without being able to explain why, right? Why call someone a child groomer without reason? Foxfyre (and others) have already tried to tell people what we are asking:


The first statements are what we allow. The second ones are not.

When I called someone a groomer the reason was in the post they made that I quoted. It was clear as day. Looks like that's not enough for some reason.

 

[miketx]

You don't object when it's hetero. But that's for another thread.

How easily they lie.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Removing or out and out ignoring.

This whole "Contact a mod" crap they do is just so they have no witnesses to their actions.


They have absolutely no intention of doing anything about mods who are out of control and engineering points of view instead of moderating
.

But still -- this is their website. If they want to make this place as obviously hostile to anybody who has experienced child abuse or simply opposes it, that is their right. All we can do is point out how they are interpreting rules to be friendly to those seeking to sexualize children and hostile to those who don't.

They always play the same stupid game where they accuse people of not being able to follow rules when it is actually a case of them bending the rules this way and that in order to punish those opposed to child abuse and favor those who advocate practices damaging to children,

 

[BackAgain]

Agreed with everything except the fact that if the legal system wasn't corrupt then why didn't they pursue the steal of the election 2020? And this latest stunt with the Democrats allowing China to spy on our military?

That’s not a sign of corruption as I interpret it.

It is more a sign of cowardice.

 

[BlueGin]

But they make up for it by being capricious and vindictive!

Not to mention smarmy and condescending with a god complex.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

How easily they lie.

and it is such a stupid and obvious lie, too.

 

[Foxfyre]

When I called someone a groomer the reason was in the post they made that I quoted. It was clear as day. Looks like that's not enough for some reason.

All you have to do is say "What you are saying is the definition of grooming" instead of saying "You are a groomer." It gets it said without violating any rule.

 

[playtime]

I reported to Coyote that playtime was using that word inappropriately in her Sig line after I had been admonished by Coyote to not use it in reference to the Oakland School districts "transition closet" and there has been no change in Playtime's Sig line.

um .... neither critical thinking or reading comp seem to be yer forte. whatever accusatory thing you wrote re: oakland school districts is most certainly a false equivalency - given the exact quote by q-anon veronica AND the revolting 'christmas' pic she & her spawn posed for in my signature.

Consistency in enforcement would be nice.

suck it up buttercup.

 

[Road Runner]

It is more a sign of cowardice.

And treason.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

All you have to do is say "What you are saying is the definition of grooming" instead of saying "You are a groomer." It gets it said without violating any rule.

No, all you really have to say is "You are a bigot, homophobe poopoohead and I will show gay porn to any damn child I want!!"

That will earn their approval instead of scorn.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Okay. My issues are:

1. I don't personally want to get involved with the police.

2. If the guy's not a pedo then I will be charged with filing a false report.

3. As I already said, the legal system is corrupt. I don't trust it at all.

If that perron is not a paedo why is it an issue ? Do you just want to throw words around ?

 

[Ropey]

Under NO circumstances are forum members allowed to call and/or accuse another member of being a child groomer.

If someone on this forum is suspected of being a groomer or pedophile, DM the mods and tell us why you suspect it and give us the evidence. We will look into it and notify the proper authorities.

This "ruling" applies to member-on-member usage. Posting threads about legit news and events concerning child grooming IS allowed. When posting replies in those threads, keep the personal attacks OUT - absolutely NO accusations towards members of this forum that can be construed as calling them a groomer or pedophile. You can and should question members on their views if you do not agree with them or do not understand them. You are NOT allowed to call them a groomer or imply that they are a groomer.

How about accusing someone of supporting those who put forwards agendas hypersexualizing prepubescent children?

This is the 'crux' of the matter, imho.

 

[miketx]

um .... neither critical thinking or reading comp seem to be yer forte. whatever accusatory thing you wrote re: oakland school districts is most certainly a false equivalency - given the exact quote by q-anon veronica AND the revolting 'christmas' pic she & her spawn posed for in my signature.




suck it up buttercup.

The lies flow.

 

[Road Runner]

If that perron isn ot a paedo why is it an issue ? Do you just want to throw words around ?

Because it's just a word to describe what you stand for in that circumstance. We call each other every other name in the book? Why ban specifically that word and the G word?