Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Constitution makes NO reference to self defense.
Article 1 Section 8 however says the following
To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces;
"To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;"
The militia was twice used to put down such insurrections in those early years (Shay's Rebellion and the Whiskey Rebellion)
By te way...that's the Constitutional description of a "Well Regulated Militia" and it's not a bunch of fat slobs sitting around the barber shop cursing the government
This guy is a troll
Unclear if he is a pretend communist but actual right wing troll or an actual Russian agitptop troll
But no supposed communist is going to attack liberals in MAGA terms like this creep does.
Troll fail
Now you're babbling
I said the militia was USED several times to put down the sort of insurrection you folks claim the 2A supports.
I showed you WHERE in the Constitution it describes and calls for that to happen.
Jesus you are stupid
There was only one Civil War that I am aware of (along with the rest of the country), and that was more than 50 years after the Militia was used to put down Shay's Rebellion and the Whiskey RebellionYet your talking point is wrong.
The first time the militia was used in a violent confrontation with civilians was in fact the first civil war.
For clarity sakeThe Constitution makes NO reference to self defense.
Article 1 Section 8 however says the following
To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces;
"To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;"
The militia was twice used to put down such insurrections in those early years (Shay's Rebellion and the Whiskey Rebellion)
By te way...that's the Constitutional description of a "Well Regulated Militia" and it's not a bunch of fat slobs sitting around the barber shop cursing the government
The most democratic society in history was Vladimir Lenin in Petrograd the winter of 1922-23.
Most leftists are morons an know nothing of what Marx wrote or what socialism is. Perhaps you're better versed. Soviets are a type of congress. In Lenin's USSR there were soviets at all levels, right down to the neighborhood.
It was all very democratic - sure the bourgeoisie, that is the Middle Class - were denied the right to vote or any sort of representation. But among the proletarians at the behest of the aristocracy and oligarchs, everyone got to vote. In fact Lenin had soviets voting on what jobs people would do - so doctors often were field hands. They would vote on what the needs of people were - so shop owners were often found to not need food. They voted on housing, so tradesmen often were found to not need to sleep indoors in the arctic city.
A third of the population was murdered through this savagery, but it was all so very democratic.
PJ O'Roark wrote that "Democracy is three wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch." (no, it wasn't Ben Franklin)
Marxists are the most brutal of all creatures, or perhaps equal to their conjoined twin the Nazis.
No you Said the second was referrenced several times in that sense.Now you're babbling
I said the militia was USED several times to put down the sort of insurrection you folks claim the 2A supports.
I showed you WHERE in the Constitution it describes and calls for that to happen.
Jesus you are stupid
I don't believe I did. Feel free to post that statement. It ought to be easy to findNo you Said the second was referrenced several times in that sense.
I am smarter than you and have proven it now run aliong BOY and let your betters talk
You know you did MORONI don't believe I did. Feel free to post that statement. It ought to be easy to find
Ohh and when trying to claim how smart you are...at least use spell check
Very simple then.You know you did MORON
Proved you wrong boy it is you full of shit and ignorantr.'Very simple then.
Find that supposed claim and hit reply so we can all see it.
Oh wait...you're full of shit yet again
There was this. Not thereThe Constitution makes NO reference to self defense.
Article 1 Section 8 however says the following
To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces;
"To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;"
The militia was twice used to put down such insurrections in those early years (Shay's Rebellion and the Whiskey Rebellion)
By te way...that's the Constitutional description of a "Well Regulated Militia" and it's not a bunch of fat slobs sitting around the barber shop cursing the government
There was this.Not according to the Constitution. It specifically points out that the “well regulated militia” is there to put DOWN such insurrections and that has happened several times
What's pathetic is a MAGArat pretending to be a communistYour reason for labeling me a troll is pathetic. I'm for arming the proletariat so I'm a troll.
Which means nothing.There was this.
Did you read it incorrectly?
MORON?
Fucking funnyProved you wrong boy it is you full of shit and ignorantr.'
And then it magically disappearedYou said it you know it now run the fuck along like I told you
Not proven...CLAIMEDWhich means nothing.
It is long since proven that gthew second refers to individual rights not an elite group such as milita
