Can Incoming AG Jeff Sessions Throw These Criminals in Prison?

Tell us more about your fantasies of throwing your political opponents into prison.


Obama did that to medical marijuana patients. He told them in 2008 that if they complied with state law, he wouldn't prosecute them. Then, in office, without warning, fascist Obama jacked those prosecutions up 5 fold. That didn't bother your fascist rear at all, did it??

Dickinson: Obama's War on Pot

:lol:

That's an adorable attempt to change the subject.
 
Tell us more about your fantasies of throwing your political opponents into prison.


Obama did that to medical marijuana patients. He told them in 2008 that if they complied with state law, he wouldn't prosecute them. Then, in office, without warning, fascist Obama jacked those prosecutions up 5 fold. That didn't bother your fascist rear at all, did it??

Dickinson: Obama's War on Pot

:lol:

That's an adorable attempt to change the subject.
Hey Doc, are you going to attend Trumps inaugural? Or are you going to the Clinton all hands in Bingo marathon on inauguration day?
 
fascists.


Want to see a fascist?

Fascists support socialism, gun confiscation, state sponsored abortions, state sponsored DNA discrimination, lying to the public via a biased/controlled media etc....

LOOK IN THE MIRROR

:lol:

Not quite. I'd suggest you read a book, but that might not be in your wheelhouse.

Tell us more about your fantasies of throwing your political opponents into prison.


People who make terroristic threats are criminals, they gave up their right to claim political opponent status when they broke the law.
 
fascists.


Want to see a fascist?

Fascists support socialism, gun confiscation, state sponsored abortions, state sponsored DNA discrimination, lying to the public via a biased/controlled media etc....

LOOK IN THE MIRROR

:lol:

Not quite. I'd suggest you read a book, but that might not be in your wheelhouse.

Tell us more about your fantasies of throwing your political opponents into prison.


People who make terroristic threats are criminals, they gave up their right to claim political opponent status when they broke the law.
Watch this moron.................profess his moronship

 
fascists.


Want to see a fascist?

Fascists support socialism, gun confiscation, state sponsored abortions, state sponsored DNA discrimination, lying to the public via a biased/controlled media etc....

LOOK IN THE MIRROR

:lol:

Not quite. I'd suggest you read a book, but that might not be in your wheelhouse.

Tell us more about your fantasies of throwing your political opponents into prison.


People who make terroristic threats are criminals, they gave up their right to claim political opponent status when they broke the law.
Watch this moron.................profess his moronship


Go right ahead Doc, tell the secret service that I called the moron a moron...............................
 
fascists.


Want to see a fascist?

Fascists support socialism, gun confiscation, state sponsored abortions, state sponsored DNA discrimination, lying to the public via a biased/controlled media etc....

LOOK IN THE MIRROR

:lol:

Not quite. I'd suggest you read a book, but that might not be in your wheelhouse.

Tell us more about your fantasies of throwing your political opponents into prison.


People who make terroristic threats are criminals, they gave up their right to claim political opponent status when they broke the law.
Watch this moron.................profess his moronship




Oh no, did we betray the trust of the gutter trash? LMAO
 
One of the things I like about Trump is that I believe he will actually ENFORCE THE LAW. We've spent 8 years under a lawless presidency, and I hope that's about to change.

Threatening, intimidating or harassing Electors is a Federal CRIME punishable by up to 5 years in prison, I believe.

I hope the Trump administration comes down like a ton of bricks on these people working to undermine the election process. Send Martin Sheen to prison as well. Make an example of the lunatic Left.



Following the election, a coalition of liberal activist groups launched #NotMyPresident Alliance, an organization dedicated to fighting the inauguration of President-elect Trump. As part of that effort, #NotMyPresident distributed personal contact information — including telephone numbers and addresses — of electors in states that voted Republican.

According to Buzzfeed, Maddie Deming, a strategist for the group, said they wanted to put electors in the spotlight and “to hold them accountable for their decision.” Whatever the intent, the initiative has produced a deluge of threats.

Electors across the country report receiving not only a flood of emails and phone calls to change their vote to Hillary Clinton but death threats as well. Alex Kim, a Texas Republican elector, reported that he and other electors had “receiv[ed] thousands of emails a day” urging them to vote for Clinton, including threats of harm and death. Arizona’s electors have reported harassment as well.

Michael Banerian, a Michigan GOP elector, received some of the most extreme threats according to The Detroit News. One email, Banerian said, talked about “shoving a gun in my mouth and blowing my brains out.” Another told him to “do society a favor and throw yourself in front of a bus.”

In Georgia and Idaho, the threats have been so extreme that the secretaries of state both released statements calling for the harassment to end. But the federal law enforcement agency that should be acting to stop these threats — the U.S. Department of Justice — has not done a thing.

Section 11b of the Voting Rights Act (52 U.S.C. §10307) makes it a crime for anyone to “intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for voting or attempting to vote.” While this has been applied in the past to ordinary, everyday voters in federal elections, the language does not limit it only to such voters. Electors who are casting their votes for president and vice president are also protected by Section 11b since the Electoral College is an essential part of the federal voting process. This is supported by Section 14(c) of the VRA, which says that “voting” includes “all action necessary to make a vote effective in any primary, special, or general election.” Obviously, the votes cast by Americans on Nov. 8 will not be effective if the electors they chose are intimidated from casting their votes in the Electoral College.

Threatening Electors Violates Federal Law. So Why Isn't Loretta Lynch Doing Anything About It?
That's a lot of people....maybe you need to set up some camps with barbed wire, and gun towers, etc.........
So you're saying people who THREATEN, INTIMIDATE or HARASS voters to force them to change their vote shouldn't be punished.
 
One of the things I like about Trump is that I believe he will actually ENFORCE THE LAW. We've spent 8 years under a lawless presidency, and I hope that's about to change.

Threatening, intimidating or harassing Electors is a Federal CRIME punishable by up to 5 years in prison, I believe.

I hope the Trump administration comes down like a ton of bricks on these people working to undermine the election process. Send Martin Sheen to prison as well. Make an example of the lunatic Left.



Following the election, a coalition of liberal activist groups launched #NotMyPresident Alliance, an organization dedicated to fighting the inauguration of President-elect Trump. As part of that effort, #NotMyPresident distributed personal contact information — including telephone numbers and addresses — of electors in states that voted Republican.

According to Buzzfeed, Maddie Deming, a strategist for the group, said they wanted to put electors in the spotlight and “to hold them accountable for their decision.” Whatever the intent, the initiative has produced a deluge of threats.

Electors across the country report receiving not only a flood of emails and phone calls to change their vote to Hillary Clinton but death threats as well. Alex Kim, a Texas Republican elector, reported that he and other electors had “receiv[ed] thousands of emails a day” urging them to vote for Clinton, including threats of harm and death. Arizona’s electors have reported harassment as well.

Michael Banerian, a Michigan GOP elector, received some of the most extreme threats according to The Detroit News. One email, Banerian said, talked about “shoving a gun in my mouth and blowing my brains out.” Another told him to “do society a favor and throw yourself in front of a bus.”

In Georgia and Idaho, the threats have been so extreme that the secretaries of state both released statements calling for the harassment to end. But the federal law enforcement agency that should be acting to stop these threats — the U.S. Department of Justice — has not done a thing.

Section 11b of the Voting Rights Act (52 U.S.C. §10307) makes it a crime for anyone to “intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for voting or attempting to vote.” While this has been applied in the past to ordinary, everyday voters in federal elections, the language does not limit it only to such voters. Electors who are casting their votes for president and vice president are also protected by Section 11b since the Electoral College is an essential part of the federal voting process. This is supported by Section 14(c) of the VRA, which says that “voting” includes “all action necessary to make a vote effective in any primary, special, or general election.” Obviously, the votes cast by Americans on Nov. 8 will not be effective if the electors they chose are intimidated from casting their votes in the Electoral College.

Threatening Electors Violates Federal Law. So Why Isn't Loretta Lynch Doing Anything About It?
That's a lot of people....maybe you need to set up some camps with barbed wire, and gun towers, etc.........
So you're saying people who THREATEN, INTIMIDATE or HARASS voters to force them to change their vote shouldn't be punished.
How about you CHARGE them first, eh? Or do you want to dispense with all that and go right to the imprisonment/execution?
 
That's an adorable attempt to change the subject.


No, it is a great example of what Obama was all about - stealing, lying, hating, and discriminating.

The stealing part being from pot criminalization - lots of spending to steal.
 

Forum List

Back
Top