Can socialists in this country explain how taxing American corporations/companies more is good?

I don't have a problem, to use your words, shaming them. Twice in my life I've been in a situation where I qualified on paper to receive handouts. Because I practice what I preach, I didn't take a dime because, as I've said, one person doesn't deserve what another person has earned unless the one providing it does so willingly.

That's exactly the kind of attitude I'm talking about. Self-righteous horseshit, and frankly, stupid. We're all forced to pay taxes for those programs. There's nothing at all wrong with using them to the fullest extent one qualifies. Are you consistent in this view? Do you also refuse to drive on public streets or send your kids to public schools? By your reasoning, shouldn't you be refusing all the benefits accrued from compulsory taxation?

It's not self righteous in any way. All it says is that I practice what I preach, therefore, there's nothing wrong with expecting other to do what I've already done.

There is something wrong. No one deserves another person's money. Thomas Sowell said it best with "what is your fair share of what someone else has worked for?" Too many people say those that earn what they have are greedy for not wanting to share it. Sharing doesn't involve a mandate from the taker but a willful act by the giver. It's not greedy to want to keep what you've earned but it damn sure it when you demand something that someone else earned as if it's owed to you.

I pay the taxes that help fund the streets and the public schools despite having sent mind to private school. A better question is shouldn't those that don't pay the taxes that fund the handouts they get not get them?

Do you keep some kind of balance sheet? A running tally of the market value of the government services you use offset by the taxes that you pay? Because if you don't, I don't know how you can be sure that you're not benefiting from tax money that's taken from someone else. You also can't know what that balance sheet of someone on welfare is. They may have paid more taxes already than you or I ever will. So your judgement is scattershot at best.

That's not necessary. All I need to know is that I pay and many who benefit don't. I'll be glad to compare tax history with some welfare recipient. I've yet to find one that was willing to do so.
 
WEll, they use the roads, enjoy the weather updates, like the clean air, water, food and the safety the police provide. They shouldn't be allowed to get all this for free while most of the middle class and smaller businesses pay up the ass.

It isn't right.

Corporations pay more in taxes in one year than you could make in a hundred lifetimes.

Well, most of them use the loop holes that allow them to pay 1/3rds as much as what is on paper. That is a fact. Also, if they're using the resources they should pay taxes.

Prove they only pay 1/3 of what is on paper.
Their effective rate rate is 12%, stupid.
 
Perhaps the GOP could stop making it so difficult and expensive to do so....

If you think someone that can't afford to go to college should be able to go, you can always write a check on their behalf to pay for it. That way it wouldn't cost them anything and they could get what you think they deserve without a single dime coming from their pocket. Remember, YOU have to totally pay for it yourself on their behalf.

As for difficult, it should be. Some dumb fuck shouldn't go to college simply because they want to go.
I guess you never went...silly stuff. We want the bloated rich and laughing giant corps to pay for it.

Graduated three times fully funded by me and/or scholarships and my wife is working on #4.

Typical Liberal answer. You want something to happen but want someone else to be forced to pay for it. Didn't think you were man enough to support your own causes. Most Liberals aren't.
And it was a lot cheaper back then, before the New BS GOP...

Didn't think you were man enough to support your own causes. Most Liberals aren't.
Any argument, MORON?
 
I don't have a problem, to use your words, shaming them. Twice in my life I've been in a situation where I qualified on paper to receive handouts. Because I practice what I preach, I didn't take a dime because, as I've said, one person doesn't deserve what another person has earned unless the one providing it does so willingly.

That's exactly the kind of attitude I'm talking about. Self-righteous horseshit, and frankly, stupid. We're all forced to pay taxes for those programs. There's nothing at all wrong with using them to the fullest extent one qualifies. Are you consistent in this view? Do you also refuse to drive on public streets or send your kids to public schools? By your reasoning, shouldn't you be refusing all the benefits accrued from compulsory taxation?

It's not self righteous in any way. All it says is that I practice what I preach, therefore, there's nothing wrong with expecting other to do what I've already done.

There is something wrong. No one deserves another person's money. Thomas Sowell said it best with "what is your fair share of what someone else has worked for?" Too many people say those that earn what they have are greedy for not wanting to share it. Sharing doesn't involve a mandate from the taker but a willful act by the giver. It's not greedy to want to keep what you've earned but it damn sure it when you demand something that someone else earned as if it's owed to you.

I pay the taxes that help fund the streets and the public schools despite having sent mind to private school. A better question is shouldn't those that don't pay the taxes that fund the handouts they get not get them?

Do you keep some kind of balance sheet? A running tally of the market value of the government services you use offset by the taxes that you pay? Because if you don't, I don't know how you can be sure that you're not benefiting from tax money that's taken from someone else. You also can't know what that balance sheet of someone on welfare is. They may have paid more taxes already than you or I ever will. So your judgement is scattershot at best.

That's not necessary. All I need to know is that I pay and many who benefit don't. I'll be glad to compare tax history with some welfare recipient. I've yet to find one that was willing to do so.
That IS all you know, angry old white dupe...
 
I don't have a problem, to use your words, shaming them. Twice in my life I've been in a situation where I qualified on paper to receive handouts. Because I practice what I preach, I didn't take a dime because, as I've said, one person doesn't deserve what another person has earned unless the one providing it does so willingly.

That's exactly the kind of attitude I'm talking about. Self-righteous horseshit, and frankly, stupid. We're all forced to pay taxes for those programs. There's nothing at all wrong with using them to the fullest extent one qualifies. Are you consistent in this view? Do you also refuse to drive on public streets or send your kids to public schools? By your reasoning, shouldn't you be refusing all the benefits accrued from compulsory taxation?

It's not self righteous in any way. All it says is that I practice what I preach, therefore, there's nothing wrong with expecting other to do what I've already done.

There is something wrong. No one deserves another person's money. Thomas Sowell said it best with "what is your fair share of what someone else has worked for?" Too many people say those that earn what they have are greedy for not wanting to share it. Sharing doesn't involve a mandate from the taker but a willful act by the giver. It's not greedy to want to keep what you've earned but it damn sure it when you demand something that someone else earned as if it's owed to you.

I pay the taxes that help fund the streets and the public schools despite having sent mind to private school. A better question is shouldn't those that don't pay the taxes that fund the handouts they get not get them?

Do you keep some kind of balance sheet? A running tally of the market value of the government services you use offset by the taxes that you pay? Because if you don't, I don't know how you can be sure that you're not benefiting from tax money that's taken from someone else. You also can't know what that balance sheet of someone on welfare is. They may have paid more taxes already than you or I ever will. So your judgement is scattershot at best.

That's not necessary. All I need to know is that I pay and many who benefit don't. I'll be glad to compare tax history with some welfare recipient. I've yet to find one that was willing to do so.
That IS all you know, angry old white dupe...

On this issue, it's all anyone needs to know.

If you care so much for all the poor people you claim to have compassion for, why aren't you giving to them to help them?
 
WEll, they use the roads, enjoy the weather updates, like the clean air, water, food and the safety the police provide. They shouldn't be allowed to get all this for free while most of the middle class and smaller businesses pay up the ass.

It isn't right.

Corporations pay more in taxes in one year than you could make in a hundred lifetimes.

Well, most of them use the loop holes that allow them to pay 1/3rds as much as what is on paper. That is a fact. Also, if they're using the resources they should pay taxes.

Prove they only pay 1/3 of what is on paper.
Their effective rate rate is 12%, stupid.

Proof? Should I accept what you say because you say it? You posted a graph saying it said something that it took about 2 seconds to show it didn't say.
 
When we stopped taxing corporations and the wealthy, we stopped doing things as a nation

No more moon shots, instead of building an interstate highway system, we let our roads and bridges go to hell

We complain about helping our poor and spending money on education and healthcare

We have instituted austerity to ensure more wealth at the top
 
When we stopped taxing corporations and the wealthy, we stopped doing things as a nation

No more moon shots, instead of building an interstate highway system, we let our roads and bridges go to hell

We complain about helping our poor and spending money on education and healthcare

We have instituted austerity to ensure more wealth at the top

Corporations and the wealthy already pay more than the half that don't pay income taxes do combined. That's easy. One taxpayer alone pays more than the half that pay nothing combined.
 
When we stopped taxing corporations and the wealthy, we stopped doing things as a nation

No more moon shots, instead of building an interstate highway system, we let our roads and bridges go to hell

We complain about helping our poor and spending money on education and healthcare

We have instituted austerity to ensure more wealth at the top

When it comes to education and healthcare, it's high time the parents of kids wanting to go to college pay for it on behalf of their own kids and people start providing their own damn healthcare instead of expecting the government to tax someone else to do it.
 
That's exactly the kind of attitude I'm talking about. Self-righteous horseshit, and frankly, stupid. We're all forced to pay taxes for those programs. There's nothing at all wrong with using them to the fullest extent one qualifies. Are you consistent in this view? Do you also refuse to drive on public streets or send your kids to public schools? By your reasoning, shouldn't you be refusing all the benefits accrued from compulsory taxation?

It's not self righteous in any way. All it says is that I practice what I preach, therefore, there's nothing wrong with expecting other to do what I've already done.

There is something wrong. No one deserves another person's money. Thomas Sowell said it best with "what is your fair share of what someone else has worked for?" Too many people say those that earn what they have are greedy for not wanting to share it. Sharing doesn't involve a mandate from the taker but a willful act by the giver. It's not greedy to want to keep what you've earned but it damn sure it when you demand something that someone else earned as if it's owed to you.

I pay the taxes that help fund the streets and the public schools despite having sent mind to private school. A better question is shouldn't those that don't pay the taxes that fund the handouts they get not get them?

Do you keep some kind of balance sheet? A running tally of the market value of the government services you use offset by the taxes that you pay? Because if you don't, I don't know how you can be sure that you're not benefiting from tax money that's taken from someone else. You also can't know what that balance sheet of someone on welfare is. They may have paid more taxes already than you or I ever will. So your judgement is scattershot at best.

That's not necessary. All I need to know is that I pay and many who benefit don't. I'll be glad to compare tax history with some welfare recipient. I've yet to find one that was willing to do so.
That IS all you know, angry old white dupe...

On this issue, it's all anyone needs to know.

If you care so much for all the poor people you claim to have compassion for, why aren't you giving to them to help them?
Keep your eyes closed, hater dupe.
13882529_10204938779988933_4525120341758487450_n.jpg
 
When we stopped taxing corporations and the wealthy, we stopped doing things as a nation

No more moon shots, instead of building an interstate highway system, we let our roads and bridges go to hell

We complain about helping our poor and spending money on education and healthcare

We have instituted austerity to ensure more wealth at the top

Corporations and the wealthy already pay more than the half that don't pay income taxes do combined. That's easy. One taxpayer alone pays more than the half that pay nothing combined.
As they should

You tax where the money is and that is where the money is. They pay most of the income taxes because they consume most of the income and wealth.....what a concept
 
When we stopped taxing corporations and the wealthy, we stopped doing things as a nation

No more moon shots, instead of building an interstate highway system, we let our roads and bridges go to hell

We complain about helping our poor and spending money on education and healthcare

We have instituted austerity to ensure more wealth at the top

When it comes to education and healthcare, it's high time the parents of kids wanting to go to college pay for it on behalf of their own kids and people start providing their own damn healthcare instead of expecting the government to tax someone else to do it.
You were always paying for the indigent and poor, just in the stupidest, cruelest, deadliest way, hater dupe. You're a gd idiot going to hell if you don't snap out of it...
 
When we stopped taxing corporations and the wealthy, we stopped doing things as a nation

No more moon shots, instead of building an interstate highway system, we let our roads and bridges go to hell

We complain about helping our poor and spending money on education and healthcare

We have instituted austerity to ensure more wealth at the top

Corporations and the wealthy already pay more than the half that don't pay income taxes do combined. That's easy. One taxpayer alone pays more than the half that pay nothing combined.
As they should

You tax where the money is and that is where the money is. They pay most of the income taxes because they consume most of the income and wealth.....what a concept

Then you give benefits where the money comes from. What a concept.

In your mind, those that give nothing should still get something. You contradict yourself.
 
When we stopped taxing corporations and the wealthy, we stopped doing things as a nation

No more moon shots, instead of building an interstate highway system, we let our roads and bridges go to hell

We complain about helping our poor and spending money on education and healthcare

We have instituted austerity to ensure more wealth at the top

When it comes to education and healthcare, it's high time the parents of kids wanting to go to college pay for it on behalf of their own kids and people start providing their own damn healthcare instead of expecting the government to tax someone else to do it.
Corporations make more money off those educations than parents do

They should pay for the product they exploit
 
When we stopped taxing corporations and the wealthy, we stopped doing things as a nation

No more moon shots, instead of building an interstate highway system, we let our roads and bridges go to hell

We complain about helping our poor and spending money on education and healthcare

We have instituted austerity to ensure more wealth at the top

When it comes to education and healthcare, it's high time the parents of kids wanting to go to college pay for it on behalf of their own kids and people start providing their own damn healthcare instead of expecting the government to tax someone else to do it.
You were always paying for the indigent and poor, just in the stupidest, cruelest, deadliest way, hater dupe. You're a gd idiot going to hell if you don't snap out of it...

It should stop unless it's voluntary. Not my place to fund college for some freeloaders's kid who won't do it. If their kid doesn't mean enough to them to help them, their damn kid doesn't mean a damn thing to me.

If they aren't willing to provide for themselves with healthcare, not my problem.
 
When we stopped taxing corporations and the wealthy, we stopped doing things as a nation

No more moon shots, instead of building an interstate highway system, we let our roads and bridges go to hell

We complain about helping our poor and spending money on education and healthcare

We have instituted austerity to ensure more wealth at the top

When it comes to education and healthcare, it's high time the parents of kids wanting to go to college pay for it on behalf of their own kids and people start providing their own damn healthcare instead of expecting the government to tax someone else to do it.
Corporations make more money off those educations than parents do

They should pay for the product they exploit

They do. It's called wages.
 
When we stopped taxing corporations and the wealthy, we stopped doing things as a nation

No more moon shots, instead of building an interstate highway system, we let our roads and bridges go to hell

We complain about helping our poor and spending money on education and healthcare

We have instituted austerity to ensure more wealth at the top

Corporations and the wealthy already pay more than the half that don't pay income taxes do combined. That's easy. One taxpayer alone pays more than the half that pay nothing combined.
As they should

You tax where the money is and that is where the money is. They pay most of the income taxes because they consume most of the income and wealth.....what a concept

Then you give benefits where the money comes from. What a concept.

In your mind, those that give nothing should still get something. You contradict yourself.
That makes absolutely no sense

You want welfare to go to the wealthy?
 
When we stopped taxing corporations and the wealthy, we stopped doing things as a nation

No more moon shots, instead of building an interstate highway system, we let our roads and bridges go to hell

We complain about helping our poor and spending money on education and healthcare

We have instituted austerity to ensure more wealth at the top

When it comes to education and healthcare, it's high time the parents of kids wanting to go to college pay for it on behalf of their own kids and people start providing their own damn healthcare instead of expecting the government to tax someone else to do it.
Corporations make more money off those educations than parents do

They should pay for the product they exploit

They do. It's called wages.
Let corporations pay to educate their workforce

Why should taxpayers be obligated to do so?
 

Forum List

Back
Top