Can someone tell me when it was that Gays had different drinking fountains?...

No gays were not shackled, sold, raped, whipped into submission, or had a community of whites track them down and drag them from the home or vehicle to be hanged .... sorry. Why don't you take some time to watch 12 years a slave and educate yourself with our nation's dark history, then find me an article where gays had to endure the same.



You haven't either so under your own logic you should not receive the same equal rights as those that have.



Gays have it tough yes, but don't try to equate their struggles with those of African Americans because you think it will draw more sympathizes to your cause. Let's try to be accurate and not look to stretch the hardships of one as being completely compatible to the other.


Nobody is comparing struggles. Nobody is comparing race to orientation despite they're both being innate traits. What is compared (and comparable) is the discrimination.

http://hnn.us/article/4708
 
Nothing, its gay marriage that is wrong. D'uh.



Oh...whew...good thing there is no such thing as "gay marriage", there is only marriage. Just like there is no "gay driver's license" or "gay tax form".



While your religion might find that unions between people of the same sex are "wrong", the government has to actually prove the "wrongness". In other words, you must have a compelling state reason to deny marriage equality to gay and lesbian couples. Your religion has no such restrictions.



It isn't always about "wrong", Seabiscuit... It's about what's not Equal.



You as an Individual are Equal to other Individuals.



Man/Woman is NOT Equal to Man/Man or Woman/Woman... This is a Natural Fact and it is "Fundamental to our very Existence and Survival." as the Court put it.



There is NOTHING about Same Sex Coupling that is that thing. :thup:



You are Equipped and Designed by Nature to Couple with the Opposite Sex. Your Choice to Defy that should not be Society's Burden.



:)



peace...


Yes Mal they are...in 17 states and counting. :lol:
 
You haven't either so under your own logic you should not receive the same equal rights as those that have.



Gays have it tough yes, but don't try to equate their struggles with those of African Americans because you think it will draw more sympathizes to your cause. Let's try to be accurate and not look to stretch the hardships of one as being completely compatible to the other.


Nobody is comparing struggles. Nobody is comparing race to orientation despite they're both being innate traits. What is compared (and comparable) is the discrimination.

History News Network | Why the Ugly Rhetoric Against Gay Marriage Is Familiar to this Historian of Miscegenation
Liar, you wont be satisfied until gays are the new protected class, even the blacks are getting tired of you trying hem in on the scam.
 
Last edited:
You haven't either so under your own logic you should not receive the same equal rights as those that have.



Gays have it tough yes, but don't try to equate their struggles with those of African Americans because you think it will draw more sympathizes to your cause. Let's try to be accurate and not look to stretch the hardships of one as being completely compatible to the other.


Nobody is comparing struggles. Nobody is comparing race to orientation despite they're both being innate traits. What is compared (and comparable) is the discrimination.

History News Network | Why the Ugly Rhetoric Against Gay Marriage Is Familiar to this Historian of Miscegenation

One is superficial and easily defined by anybody.

One is a guess, defined only by the individual that claims to be.

Wanna guess which is which?

Blindness can be innate. It is not discrimination not to issue them a drivers license.
 
You haven't either so under your own logic you should not receive the same equal rights as those that have.



Gays have it tough yes, but don't try to equate their struggles with those of African Americans because you think it will draw more sympathizes to your cause. Let's try to be accurate and not look to stretch the hardships of one as being completely compatible to the other.


Nobody is comparing struggles. Nobody is comparing race to orientation despite they're both being innate traits. What is compared (and comparable) is the discrimination.

History News Network | Why the Ugly Rhetoric Against Gay Marriage Is Familiar to this Historian of Miscegenation

so how do you compare their descrimination without comaparing their struggles?


And no being gay is a choice not a genetic defect
 
Tell us how you "decided" to be straight.
How long did you guys contemplate cock before you made your decision to be straight?
Did not happen that way with me but if you guys claim you contemplated all your choices and you sat and thought long and hard about how a cock in your mouth is one of your choices I believe you.
But that shit never happened with me.
I never thought about that and never chose my sexuality.
I was born that way. No one chooses who they are attracted to.

Is it possible for you to be any more vulgar? For the record, I'd don't think being gay is a choice in most cases, but trans-gendered certainly is.
 
Gays have it tough yes, but don't try to equate their struggles with those of African Americans because you think it will draw more sympathizes to your cause. Let's try to be accurate and not look to stretch the hardships of one as being completely compatible to the other.





Nobody is comparing struggles. Nobody is comparing race to orientation despite they're both being innate traits. What is compared (and comparable) is the discrimination.



History News Network | Why the Ugly Rhetoric Against Gay Marriage Is Familiar to this Historian of Miscegenation



so how do you compare their descrimination without comaparing their struggles?





And no being gay is a choice not a genetic defect


So you could choose? You're bi, dude.
 
Gays have it tough yes, but don't try to equate their struggles with those of African Americans because you think it will draw more sympathizes to your cause. Let's try to be accurate and not look to stretch the hardships of one as being completely compatible to the other.


Nobody is comparing struggles. Nobody is comparing race to orientation despite they're both being innate traits. What is compared (and comparable) is the discrimination.

History News Network | Why the Ugly Rhetoric Against Gay Marriage Is Familiar to this Historian of Miscegenation

so how do you compare their descrimination without comaparing their struggles?


And no being gay is a choice not a genetic defect
It is a developmental aberration, whereas being a certain ethnicity is not.
 
Gays have it tough yes, but don't try to equate their struggles with those of African Americans because you think it will draw more sympathizes to your cause. Let's try to be accurate and not look to stretch the hardships of one as being completely compatible to the other.


Nobody is comparing struggles. Nobody is comparing race to orientation despite they're both being innate traits. What is compared (and comparable) is the discrimination.

History News Network | Why the Ugly Rhetoric Against Gay Marriage Is Familiar to this Historian of Miscegenation

so how do you compare their descrimination without comaparing their struggles?


And no being gay is a choice not a genetic defect

Irrelevant.

Whether one is gay as a consequence of choice or birth is legally and Constitutionally irrelevant.

The 5th Amendment’s Liberty Clause guarantees each American the right to self-determination, and the right to make a choice concerning personal, private matters absent interference by the state:

It suffices for us to acknowledge that adults may choose to enter upon this relationship in the confines of their homes and their own private lives and still retain their dignity as free persons. When sexuality finds overt expression in intimate conduct with another person, the conduct can be but one element in a personal bond that is more enduring. The liberty protected by the Constitution allows homosexual persons the right to make this choice.

LAWRENCE V. TEXAS

As a fact of law gay Americans manifest a class of persons entitled to Constitutional protections, including the right to exercise one’s liberty as an individual.
 
Liar, you wont be satisfied until gays are the new protected class, even the blacks are getting tired of you trying hem in on the scam.

You only have protected classes because people are so willing to attack.

Stop attacking and there won't be a problem.
 
Liar, you wont be satisfied until gays are the new protected class, even the blacks are getting tired of you trying hem in on the scam.

You only have protected classes because people are so willing to attack.

Stop attacking and there won't be a problem.

Suck a cock and shut the fuck up already. :thup:

:)

peace...
 
Nobody is comparing struggles. Nobody is comparing race to orientation despite they're both being innate traits. What is compared (and comparable) is the discrimination.



History News Network | Why the Ugly Rhetoric Against Gay Marriage Is Familiar to this Historian of Miscegenation



so how do you compare their descrimination without comaparing their struggles?





And no being gay is a choice not a genetic defect


So you could choose? You're bi, dude.

Well ive only chosen women, so im hetero, but maybe im born to choose lucky charms.
 
You haven't either so under your own logic you should not receive the same equal rights as those that have.



Gays have it tough yes, but don't try to equate their struggles with those of African Americans because you think it will draw more sympathizes to your cause. Let's try to be accurate and not look to stretch the hardships of one as being completely compatible to the other.


Nobody is comparing struggles. Nobody is comparing race to orientation despite they're both being innate traits. What is compared (and comparable) is the discrimination.

History News Network | Why the Ugly Rhetoric Against Gay Marriage Is Familiar to this Historian of Miscegenation

That homosexuality is an innate trait is not established , in fact most evidence seems to indicate otherwise - that it is not something one is born with.

The bible of Gay Media Manipulators, a brilliant book After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90's by two devious homosexuals, Marshall Kirk, a researcher in neuropsychiatry and Hunter Madsen . This powerfully persuasive, perverse and popular 1989 book presents an impassioned plea, for homosexual activists to implement an aggressive, concerted and organized campaign to mold public perceptions. It is basically a blueprint for the Gay Agenda, it makes the following statement
We argue that for all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been born gay, even though sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence (page 184); ....... http://loonybird.com/gay_disease.htm
 
Nobody is comparing struggles. Nobody is comparing race to orientation despite they're both being innate traits. What is compared (and comparable) is the discrimination.

History News Network | Why the Ugly Rhetoric Against Gay Marriage Is Familiar to this Historian of Miscegenation

so how do you compare their descrimination without comaparing their struggles?


And no being gay is a choice not a genetic defect

Irrelevant.

Whether one is gay as a consequence of choice or birth is legally and Constitutionally irrelevant.

The 5th Amendment’s Liberty Clause guarantees each American the right to self-determination, and the right to make a choice concerning personal, private matters absent interference by the state:

It suffices for us to acknowledge that adults may choose to enter upon this relationship in the confines of their homes and their own private lives and still retain their dignity as free persons. When sexuality finds overt expression in intimate conduct with another person, the conduct can be but one element in a personal bond that is more enduring. The liberty protected by the Constitution allows homosexual persons the right to make this choice.

LAWRENCE V. TEXAS

As a fact of law gay Americans manifest a class of persons entitled to Constitutional protections, including the right to exercise one’s liberty as an individual.

funny the people who wrote the constitution disagree, noone said clayton sant suck a dick or use anal beads. Just dont get me involved and dont try to tell me its normal
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: mal
No gays were not shackled, sold, raped, whipped into submission, or had a community of whites track them down and drag them from the home or vehicle to be hanged .... sorry. Why don't you take some time to watch 12 years a slave and educate yourself with our nation's dark history, then find me an article where gays had to endure the same.

You haven't either so under your own logic you should not receive the same equal rights as those that have.

Gays have it tough yes, but don't try to equate their struggles with those of African Americans because you think it will draw more sympathizes to your cause. Let's try to be accurate and not look to stretch the hardships of one as being completely compatible to the other.

Attempting to paint the picture of the so-called 'oppression of Gays' as a Civil Rights issue is a detestable facet of the Gay Agenda and agrotesuqe insult to African Americans , who are just as disgusted with the Queer Community as are all decent members of society, regardless of whether they feign acceptance or not -

Gays [as a group] have never been , never will be and never can be Socially well adjusted or mentally stable human beings - they are degenrates, perverts, pedophiles and diseased both psychologically and physically.
 
Last edited:
You haven't either so under your own logic you should not receive the same equal rights as those that have.

Gays have it tough yes, but don't try to equate their struggles with those of African Americans because you think it will draw more sympathizes to your cause. Let's try to be accurate and not look to stretch the hardships of one as being completely compatible to the other.

Attempting to paint the picture of the so-called 'oppression of Gays' as a Civil Rights issue is a detestable facet of the Gay Agenda and agrotesuqe insult to African Americans , who are just as disgusted with the Queer Community as are all decent members of society, regardless of whether they feign acceptance or not -

Gays [as a group] have never been , never will be and never can be Socially well adjusted or mentally stable human beings - they are degenrates, perverts, pedophiles and diseased both psychologically and physically.

Oh my yes, why would gays ever consider themselves vulnerable to prejudice or oppression?

It's not like there's anyone around who considers them detestable and gross, incapable of being socially well adjusted or mentally stable, no,

no one who thinks they are degenerate, perverted, diseased pedophiles...

...comon!! It's all in your imagination Gay People!!!!

lol
 
Nobody is comparing struggles. Nobody is comparing race to orientation despite they're both being innate traits. What is compared (and comparable) is the discrimination.

History News Network | Why the Ugly Rhetoric Against Gay Marriage Is Familiar to this Historian of Miscegenation

so how do you compare their descrimination without comaparing their struggles?


And no being gay is a choice not a genetic defect

It is a developmental aberration....

You mean like becoming a fundamentalist Christian?
 

Forum List

Back
Top