Can someone tell me when it was that Gays had different drinking fountains?...

[frigidweirdo]

There is no good argument against gay marriage, and obviously you can't cite even an attempt.

Man/Woman are not Equal to Man/Man or Woman/Woman... Biological and Natural Fact.



peace...[/QUOTE]

It doesn't matter if you think they're not equal. Under the law they should be.

 

[Pop23]

There is no good argument against gay marriage, and obviously you can't cite even an attempt.

Man/Woman are not Equal to Man/Man or Woman/Woman... Biological and Natural Fact.



peace...

It doesn't matter if you think they're not equal. Under the law they should be.

They are. Simply marry a member of the opposite sex, so that your united couple has every component necessary to move the species forward

It's really pretty simple

Same rule applies to me

 

[frigidweirdo]

Romans 1:26-27

"Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error."

Homosexuality is not new. God warned about it in the Old Testament as well as the New Testament. Remember Sodom and Gomorrah?

Satan pulls man down to his level a little at a time until finally he has them right where he wants them, in the sewers.

How many times do you need to ignore the reality of why this was written in the Bible? It was there because a practice of religions that Christianity took over from was to sleep with priests to get closer to God. That's what the Oracle was for. This is what the Bible wanted to get rid of.

 

[GISMYS]

BELIEVERS!=JJOur hope is always in Jesus Christ. Any individual, regardless of the sins in their life, can be saved from the wrath to come by putting his or her faith in Jesus Christ. Jesus can clean them up and make them white as snow.

"Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool." (Isaiah 1:18)

Only Jesus can take a blackened heart and change it to one that shines with His own brightness.

Our blind hearts will bring nothing but judgment down upon our heads, but by trusting in Jesus, we can be forgiven and assured of our home in Heaven.

 

[frigidweirdo]

None of those things are rights.

If marriage isn't a right, why did the Supreme Court force the states to recognize interracial marriages?

If marriage was not a protected right under the Constitution, then the States would have retained their right to ban interracial marriage.

Did the Court wrongly decide that?

You have to be licensed. Rights don't come with a license.

So, if the govt license something, it automatically becomes not a right? You need to get a birth certificate, does that mean there is no right to life?

 

[GISMYS]

Romans 1:26-27

"Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error."

Homosexuality is not new. God warned about it in the Old Testament as well as the New Testament. Remember Sodom and Gomorrah?

Satan pulls man down to his level a little at a time until finally he has them right where he wants them, in the sewers.

How many times do you need to ignore the reality of why this was written in the Bible? It was there because a practice of religions that Christianity took over from was to sleep with priests to get closer to God. That's what the Oracle was for. This is what the Bible wanted to get rid of.

ROFLMAO!!! SO YOU THINK GOD DIDNOT DESTROYED SODOM BECAUSE OF THEIR EVIL DEEDS,TRYING TO ATTACK GOD'S ANGELS WITH SEXUAL PERVERSION??? get real!!!!

 

[Pop23]

If marriage isn't a right, why did the Supreme Court force the states to recognize interracial marriages?

If marriage was not a protected right under the Constitution, then the States would have retained their right to ban interracial marriage.

Did the Court wrongly decide that?

You have to be licensed. Rights don't come with a license.

So, if the govt license something, it automatically becomes not a right? You need to get a birth certificate, does that mean there is no right to life?

A birth certificate is not a license to birth

I'd say nice try, but that would be a stretch.

 

[frigidweirdo]

BELIEVERS!=JJOur hope is always in Jesus Christ. Any individual, regardless of the sins in their life, can be saved from the wrath to come by putting his or her faith in Jesus Christ. Jesus can clean them up and make them white as snow.

"Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool." (Isaiah 1:18)

Only Jesus can take a blackened heart and change it to one that shines with His own brightness.

Our blind hearts will bring nothing but judgment down upon our heads, but by trusting in Jesus, we can be forgiven and assured of our home in Heaven.

What does this have to do with anything?

Maybe these people don't give a damn whether they are pure or not, perhaps they prefer not to be pure, and it's not your place to tell them otherwise.

 

[frigidweirdo]

You have to be licensed. Rights don't come with a license.

So, if the govt license something, it automatically becomes not a right? You need to get a birth certificate, does that mean there is no right to life?

A birth certificate is not a license to birth

I'd say nice try, but that would be a stretch.

That's not the point.

The point is you said because there is a license, that it can't be a right.

Which means the govt could just put a license against something and it automatically doesn't become a right, in your view.

 

[GISMYS]

God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error."
Homosexuality is not new. God warned about it in the Old Testament as well as the New Testament. Remember Sodom and Gomorrah?
Satan pulls man down to his level a little at a time until finally he has them right where he wants them, in the sewers.yet they went right ahead and did them anyway and encouraged others to do them, too. and you????

 

[frigidweirdo]

ROFLMAO!!! SO YOU THINK GOD DIDNOT DESTROYED SODOM BECAUSE OF THEIR EVIL DEEDS,TRYING TO ATTACK GOD'S ANGELS WITH SEXUAL PERVERSION??? get real!!!!

Nope!

You want real now? Oh, that's a bit rich from someone peddling religion which has no basis in reality whatsoever.

 

[frigidweirdo]

God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error."
Homosexuality is not new. God warned about it in the Old Testament as well as the New Testament. Remember Sodom and Gomorrah?
Satan pulls man down to his level a little at a time until finally he has them right where he wants them, in the sewers.yet they went right ahead and did them anyway and encouraged others to do them, too. and you????

You know Satan is an anagram of Santa right?

 

[GISMYS]

God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error."
Homosexuality is not new. God warned about it in the Old Testament as well as the New Testament. Remember Sodom and Gomorrah?
Satan pulls man down to his level a little at a time until finally he has them right where he wants them, in the sewers.yet they went right ahead and did them anyway and encouraged others to do them, too. and you????

You know Satan is an anagram of Santa right?

Don’t you know that those doing such things have no share in the Kingdom of God? Don’t fool yourselves. Those who live immoral lives, who are idol worshipers, adulterers or homosexuals—will have no share in his Kingdom. 1 CORINTHIANS 6:9-10

 

[frigidweirdo]

Don’t you know that those doing such things have no share in the Kingdom of God? Don’t fool yourselves. Those who live immoral lives, who are idol worshipers, adulterers or homosexuals—will have no share in his Kingdom. 1 CORINTHIANS 6:9-10

Why do I care about the supposed "kingdom of God"? You don't even know it exists, you want reality, that's the reality. Someone told you it exists to keep you in your place, and you accept your place, that's your problem, it ain't my place.

Surely you're treating God as an idol, oh, that makes you an idol worshiper.

1 Corinthians 6 KJ21 - Dare any of you, having a complaint - Bible Gateway

"9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the Kingdom of God? Be not deceived: Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor the effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10 nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners shall inherit the Kingdom of God."

1 Corinthians 6 GNV - 1 He inveigheth against their - Bible Gateway

"9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? [m]Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor wantons, nor buggerers,
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor railers, nor extortioners shall inherit the kingdom of God."

Funny how you get the version which changes things to "homosexuals" when others use "effeminate" or "buggerers".

 

[Pop23]

So, if the govt license something, it automatically becomes not a right? You need to get a birth certificate, does that mean there is no right to life?

A birth certificate is not a license to birth

I'd say nice try, but that would be a stretch.

That's not the point.

The point is you said because there is a license, that it can't be a right.

Which means the govt could just put a license against something and it automatically doesn't become a right, in your view.

No, the government can't. Try again

You can have restrictions to rights. Can't scream fire in a crowded theater. But rights are rights.

 

[frigidweirdo]

No, the government can't. Try again

You can have restrictions to rights. Can't scream fire in a crowded theater. But rights are rights.

What do you mean "they can't". The govt CAN do things that are unconstitutional. They've done plenty of them. You know, like how the Supreme Court overturns things that the govt did previously, they even overturned their own decisions.

So, they can, doesn't mean it's constitutional. That's different. However take things like Dred Scott, it was there, it existed, in theory it was unconstitutional but was the law of the land for ages.

Rights are rights and right can be infringed, the govt can even tell itself its infringement isn't an infringement.

They can even say there isn't a right to marriage, or one part can say there is and another can say there isn't.

Go figure.

 

[alan1]

Gay marriage is a non issue that the right wing religious kooks bring up every election to lure the dumb masses.
Barry Goldwater warned us against that in the early 60s.
True conservatives move on to the other 171 more important issues and mind our own business if 2 homosexuals happen to fall in love with each other and want to honor their commitment to each other with a marriage.

Dumbass leftwingers keep bringing up homosexual marriage as an issue the government should be involved in.
How about if the government completely remove itself from the issue of marriage. Marriage is none of their fucking business.

I am not a left winger, have been voting Republican since 1971 long before you were sucking on yo mama's tit.
Marriage is none of anyone's business so who cares if gay folk get married?
It is none of your business.
The religious right wing are the ones that keep bringing it up.
You have it backwards, imagine that.

It's the homosexuals and mili-dems that keep insisting that the government get involved in homosexual marriage, because they like big nanny government. Well, they got what they asked for, now they get to spend time in court for divorce.

Have fun dealing with your government bureaucracy that you begged for, dipshits.
Lesbian couple who got hitched shortly after gay marriage became legal in New York State set to become one of first gay divorces - NY Daily News

 

[AntiParty]

Or maybe even better than that, when they were denied the Vote?...

How about someone telling me when Gays were Slaves in this Country and were regularly Whipped by their Owners?...

I'll be here waiting, because I am certain all of the people who continue to Dishonestly compare the "struggle" of Gays making their Homosexuality as public as possible Analagous to what Blacks have Suffered in this Country for hundreds of years can explain to me how they are even remotely comparible...

Honest people KNOW they are not.



peace...

Your understanding of oppression is comical. And a bit disturbing that an American in 2014 thinks the way you do. You directly raised a flag stating, "I'm an uneducated American!"

I want to say, "this will help you with your perspective" but your perspective is obviously flawed and bias and unable to retrieve new information. I'm absolutely sad for you. Perhaps if you see this you will learn something. But I know that learning is a big problem for many

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8JsRx2lois]OFFICIAL Preacher Phil Snider gives interesting gay rights speech - YouTube[/ame]

 

[AntiParty]

Dumbass leftwingers keep bringing up homosexual marriage as an issue the government should be involved in.
How about if the government completely remove itself from the issue of marriage. Marriage is none of their fucking business.

I am not a left winger, have been voting Republican since 1971 long before you were sucking on yo mama's tit.
Marriage is none of anyone's business so who cares if gay folk get married?
It is none of your business.
The religious right wing are the ones that keep bringing it up.
You have it backwards, imagine that.

It's the homosexuals and mili-dems that keep insisting that the government get involved in homosexual marriage, because they like big nanny government. Well, they got what they asked for, now they get to spend time in court for divorce.

Have fun dealing with your government bureaucracy that you begged for, dipshits.
Lesbian couple who got hitched shortly after gay marriage became legal in New York State set to become one of first gay divorces - NY Daily News

You think it's the Left that is "Big Government" on this issue and you are not alone on your STUPIDITY!

Big Government made LAWS to prevent Gay Marriage.

Gay Marriage wasn't somehow "against the law" to begin with. It use to be a freedom. Learn more, talk less.

 

[AntiParty]

A birth certificate is not a license to birth

I'd say nice try, but that would be a stretch.

That's not the point.

The point is you said because there is a license, that it can't be a right.

Which means the govt could just put a license against something and it automatically doesn't become a right, in your view.

No, the government can't. Try again

You can have restrictions to rights. Can't scream fire in a crowded theater. But rights are rights.

Thanks for your perspective? Was that even a point or are you drunk again?