Can those who have NEVER served make SOME sacrifice for this great nation?

The far left has destroyed many countries and have proven time and time again that they should never be in power.

The most prosperous countries in the world today are built on predominantly liberal policies. Conservative policies get you countries like Iran and Pakistan. You must be proud.

Proud, probably. But he has abso-fucking-lutely no idea what living in a real socialist country is like. He's just been taught to be afraid of anything socialist.

So I suggest he avoid national parks, crossing the Hoover Dam and entering public libraries.

Of course. This is why none of these "conservatives" can point out a single country that is being successfully run with policies that they consider "conservative worthy". They live in a fantasy world. That much is plain to see.
 
The most prosperous countries in the world today are built on predominantly liberal policies. Conservative policies get you countries like Iran and Pakistan. You must be proud.

Proud, probably. But he has abso-fucking-lutely no idea what living in a real socialist country is like. He's just been taught to be afraid of anything socialist.

So I suggest he avoid national parks, crossing the Hoover Dam and entering public libraries.

Of course. This is why none of these "conservatives" can point out a single country that is being successfully run with policies that they consider "conservative worthy". They live in a fantasy world. That much is plain to see.

Botswana, Singapore, Hong Kong, although more libertarian in principle, follow a reasonably conservative economic policy.
 
Awesome non-answer.

And yet more proof that the far left does not understand the Constitution.

And more proof that you people are literally parrots. You don't answer his question because you don't know how to respond so you respond with your parrot talking points, over and over again. And you wonder why everyone laughs at you.

I don't answer loaded questions.

However explaining the Constitution to the far left would be an exercise in futility.
 
Proud, probably. But he has abso-fucking-lutely no idea what living in a real socialist country is like. He's just been taught to be afraid of anything socialist.

So I suggest he avoid national parks, crossing the Hoover Dam and entering public libraries.

Of course. This is why none of these "conservatives" can point out a single country that is being successfully run with policies that they consider "conservative worthy". They live in a fantasy world. That much is plain to see.

Botswana, Singapore, Hong Kong, although more libertarian in principle, follow a reasonably conservative economic policy.

Botswana and Singapore.

I rest my case.
 
The most prosperous countries in the world today are built on predominantly liberal policies. Conservative policies get you countries like Iran and Pakistan. You must be proud.

Proud, probably. But he has abso-fucking-lutely no idea what living in a real socialist country is like. He's just been taught to be afraid of anything socialist.

So I suggest he avoid national parks, crossing the Hoover Dam and entering public libraries.

Of course. This is why none of these "conservatives" can point out a single country that is being successfully run with policies that they consider "conservative worthy". They live in a fantasy world. That much is plain to see.

Funny the far left can not point to a country that is prospering under far left rule, yet want others to something they can not do themselves. Typical far left.
 
And yet more proof that the far left does not understand the Constitution.

And more proof that you people are literally parrots. You don't answer his question because you don't know how to respond so you respond with your parrot talking points, over and over again. And you wonder why everyone laughs at you.

I don't answer loaded questions.

However explaining the Constitution to the far left would be an exercise in futility.

Haha, loaded questions. You mean you don't answer questions that your handlers haven't given you a response to fire back with.

Maybe the next time you call in to Rush you can ask him how to best respond.
 
Another typical far left response.

Buy 'em books, send 'em to school, and what do they do? They eat the books. Sonny you might pick one up some time and do a little reading of history. It is amazing what you might learn, if you have the capacity to do so.

Picking up books written by far left zealots on "empires" does not equate to "truth".

Being open minded is not a far left trait as exhibited by all the far left posters here.

James K. Polk was one of the faces of extreme American expansion. He started a war based on a false premise in order to acquire territory. The idea of America being an Empire IN THE PAST, isn't too far fetched.
 
Proud, probably. But he has abso-fucking-lutely no idea what living in a real socialist country is like. He's just been taught to be afraid of anything socialist.

So I suggest he avoid national parks, crossing the Hoover Dam and entering public libraries.

Of course. This is why none of these "conservatives" can point out a single country that is being successfully run with policies that they consider "conservative worthy". They live in a fantasy world. That much is plain to see.

Funny the far left can not point to a country that is prospering under far left rule, yet want others to something they can not do themselves. Typical far left.

Of course I can. Pick any of the Scandinavian countries for starters.

List of the most prosperous countries. Which of these are conservative nations?

http://www.prosperity.com/#!/?aspxerrorpath=%2Fmedia.aspx

1. Norway
2. Switzerland
3. Canada
4. Sweden
5. New Zealand
6. Denmark
7. Australia
8. Finland
9. Netherlands
10. Luxembourg

Quick, break out the canned talking points!
 
And more proof that you people are literally parrots. You don't answer his question because you don't know how to respond so you respond with your parrot talking points, over and over again. And you wonder why everyone laughs at you.

I don't answer loaded questions.

However explaining the Constitution to the far left would be an exercise in futility.

Haha, loaded questions. You mean you don't answer questions that your handlers haven't given you a response to fire back with.

Maybe the next time you call in to Rush you can ask him how to best respond.

Then show where it is the responsibility of the government to run healthcare and how much of the budget all the social programs should take via the Constition?
 
Last edited:
Buy 'em books, send 'em to school, and what do they do? They eat the books. Sonny you might pick one up some time and do a little reading of history. It is amazing what you might learn, if you have the capacity to do so.

Picking up books written by far left zealots on "empires" does not equate to "truth".

Being open minded is not a far left trait as exhibited by all the far left posters here.

James K. Polk was one of the faces of extreme American expansion. He started a war based on a false premise in order to acquire territory. The idea of America being an Empire IN THE PAST, isn't too far fetched.

Well if we are going to use that as an example then every nation back in those days were bent on being an "empire".

Historians have emphasized that "Manifest Destiny" was a contested concept--many prominent Americans (such as Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, and most Whigs and Republicans) rejected it.
 
The point of the thread is that asshole Dumbocrats expect 18 year olds to have their heads blown off for the survival of the United States, but they are not willing to give up entitlements for the survival of the United States.

In other words, while they expect others to make sacrifices on their behalf, they are not willing to make any themselves. This has liberals really pissed off because there is no intelligent response to dispute a statement that is correct.

The problem is assholes (like you?) supported the invasion and occupation of Iraq, which had zero ability to threaten the survival of our county which cost the lives of a generation of Americans and disabled countless others, while depleting our treasury of funds needed to repair the aging infrastructure of our nation. A policy which would have created jobs far and wide at home.

The problem is assholes like you support the radicals in Congress which has done nothing to protect the survival of American Citizens in terms of their financial security, before or after retirement, who support 'slave' wages and keep the minimum wage at a minimum, refuse to extend unemployment insurance to those in need and even object the Children's Health Insurance Program.

The problem is greed has become a virtue in the minds of the callous conservatives, generally the set of sociopaths (people without empathy) who live by the motto of "I've got mine, fuck the rest of you".

Greed is exclusive to conservatives? Okie dokie

Of course not, greed is one of the deadly sins. Only callous conservatives consider greed a virtue.
 
Picking up books written by far left zealots on "empires" does not equate to "truth".

Being open minded is not a far left trait as exhibited by all the far left posters here.

James K. Polk was one of the faces of extreme American expansion. He started a war based on a false premise in order to acquire territory. The idea of America being an Empire IN THE PAST, isn't too far fetched.

Well if we are going to use that as an example then every nation back in those days were bent on being an "empire".

Historians have emphasized that "Manifest Destiny" was a contested concept--many prominent Americans (such as Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, and most Whigs and Republicans) rejected it.

The Whigs primarily rejected it because it would have likely meant the expansion of slavery to new states (such as the former territories of Mexico), and they would lose their influence in the Senate.

However, the U.S was specifically referred to as an empire bent on expanding its territory, by Jefferson, Jackson, and Polk.
 
The problem is assholes (like you?) supported the invasion and occupation of Iraq, which had zero ability to threaten the survival of our county which cost the lives of a generation of Americans and disabled countless others, while depleting our treasury of funds needed to repair the aging infrastructure of our nation. A policy which would have created jobs far and wide at home.

The problem is assholes like you support the radicals in Congress which has done nothing to protect the survival of American Citizens in terms of their financial security, before or after retirement, who support 'slave' wages and keep the minimum wage at a minimum, refuse to extend unemployment insurance to those in need and even object the Children's Health Insurance Program.

The problem is greed has become a virtue in the minds of the callous conservatives, generally the set of sociopaths (people without empathy) who live by the motto of "I've got mine, fuck the rest of you".

Greed is exclusive to conservatives? Okie dokie

Of course not, greed is one of the deadly sins. Only callous conservatives consider greed a virtue.

More far left propaganda
 
I don't answer loaded questions.

However explaining the Constitution to the far left would be an exercise in futility.

Haha, loaded questions. You mean you don't answer questions that your handlers haven't given you a response to fire back with.

Maybe the next time you call in to Rush you can ask him how to best respond.

Then show where it is the responsibility of the government to run healthcare and how much of the budget all the social programs should take via the Constition?

It doesn't say that explicitly, just like it doesn't say how much we should be spending on defense. Which is the whole point that you refused to acknowledge.

Just because the Constitution allows for spending on defense it doesn't mandate a minimum spend level. Hence, we can certainly reduce the tremendous defense spending we currently engage in.

Get it yet?
 
Of course. This is why none of these "conservatives" can point out a single country that is being successfully run with policies that they consider "conservative worthy". They live in a fantasy world. That much is plain to see.

Botswana, Singapore, Hong Kong, although more libertarian in principle, follow a reasonably conservative economic policy.

Botswana and Singapore.

I rest my case.

Doesn't Botswana lead the world in AIDS infections?

I guess that is why he considers it a Conservative paradise
 
Typical far left response.

Where in the Constitution does it mandate how much must be spent on defense?

More proof that the far left does not understand the Constitution.

Oh goody, another expert on the Constitution of the United States. Tell us oh wise one, where in the Constitution did it authorize the Federal Government to provide the Salk Vaccine to the citizens of the United States? Do you believe the Eisenhower Administration was acting illegally in doing so? Would you prefer the parents of afflicted children purchase an Iron Lung to keep their child alive instead?
 
Botswana, Singapore, Hong Kong, although more libertarian in principle, follow a reasonably conservative economic policy.

Botswana and Singapore.

I rest my case.

Doesn't Botswana lead the world in AIDS infections?

I guess that is why he considers it a Conservative paradise

"If you just apply conservative principles you too could be living in a paradise like Botswana or Singapore. Dare to Dream. "
 

Forum List

Back
Top