Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just printed 85-billion in funny-money each month.
Them chickens is gonna come to roost.
Patience, hoppagrasses....
Really moronic to do nothing but spew bullshit.Obama's recovery has been worse than Bush's recession.
Once again, you are wrong.
He must be, just becuz you say so.....
I didn't just say, I demonstrated.
Of the $17 trillion national debt, the last three republican presidents added $11 trillion of it. AND AND AND, Shrub and the cons destroyed the U.S. economy, AND AND AND the global economy. AND left Obama with a $1.2 trillion annual deficit.
And all the cons can do is spew bullshit for twenty seven pages.
Of the $17 trillion national debt, the last three republican presidents added $11 trillion of it. AND AND AND, Shrub and the cons destroyed the U.S. economy, AND AND AND the global economy. AND left Obama with a $1.2 trillion annual deficit.
And all the cons can do is spew bullshit for twenty seven pages.
Just printed 85-billion in funny-money each month.
Them chickens is gonna come to roost.
Patience, hoppagrasses....
Those facts the op gave hurt you so bad, you had to try to change the subject. But your facts are deceptive bullshit. If Shrub hadn't destroyed the economy and left office with a $1.2 trillion annual deficit, the fed wouldn't have had to print that money to bring back the economy.
Really moronic to do nothing but spew bullshit.Obama's recovery has been worse than Bush's recession.
So who is responsible?
Oh yeah, George W Bush.
So who is responsible?
Oh yeah, George W Bush.
"The debt explosion has resulted not from big spending by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party's embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious doctrine that deficits don't matter if they result from tax cuts."
David Stockman - Director of the Office of Management and Budget for U.S. President Ronald Reagan.
So who is responsible?
Oh yeah, George W Bush.
"The debt explosion has resulted not from big spending by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party's embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious doctrine that deficits don't matter if they result from tax cuts."
David Stockman - Director of the Office of Management and Budget for U.S. President Ronald Reagan.
That was back in 2010. And who cares what Stockman, architect of Bush's tax increase, has to say?
"People are not on unemployment for 2 years because there are no jobs. There are no jobs because people are on unemployment for 2 years."
Wow two fallacies n one post."The debt explosion has resulted not from big spending by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party's embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious doctrine that deficits don't matter if they result from tax cuts."
David Stockman - Director of the Office of Management and Budget for U.S. President Ronald Reagan.
That was back in 2010. And who cares what Stockman, architect of Bush's tax increase, has to say?
"People are not on unemployment for 2 years because there are no jobs. There are no jobs because people are on unemployment for 2 years."
The Rabbi
I was right: Under Obama, spending has been flat - Rex Nutting - MarketWatch
Facts:
1. Obama will add more to the Federal debt than all other U.S. President combined.
2. The moderate slow down in current deficit spending is due to the sequester which Obama claims he had nothing to do with and blames on the Republicans. The Dems also hate it.
So I guess in reality you should be thanking the Republicans for slowly down deficit spending.
Obama did nothing to increase spending.
"The debt explosion has resulted not from big spending by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party's embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious doctrine that deficits don't matter if they result from tax cuts."
David Stockman - Director of the Office of Management and Budget for U.S. President Ronald Reagan.
That was back in 2010. And who cares what Stockman, architect of Bush's tax increase, has to say?
"People are not on unemployment for 2 years because there are no jobs. There are no jobs because people are on unemployment for 2 years."
The Rabbi
Wow two fallacies n one post.That was back in 2010. And who cares what Stockman, architect of Bush's tax increase, has to say?
"People are not on unemployment for 2 years because there are no jobs. There are no jobs because people are on unemployment for 2 years."
The Rabbi
First posting a chart from a leftist web site with an obvious agenda.
Next posting something whcih is true, for which I have provided evidence, and still mocking it because you dont understand it.
You're on a roll: batting .000
Wow two fallacies n one post.
"People are not on unemployment for 2 years because there are no jobs. There are no jobs because people are on unemployment for 2 years."
The Rabbi
First posting a chart from a leftist web site with an obvious agenda.
Next posting something whcih is true, for which I have provided evidence, and still mocking it because you dont understand it.
You're on a roll: batting .000
What is the 'leftist' agenda of this web site?
Wow two fallacies n one post.
First posting a chart from a leftist web site with an obvious agenda.
Next posting something whcih is true, for which I have provided evidence, and still mocking it because you dont understand it.
You're on a roll: batting .000
What is the 'leftist' agenda of this web site?
I have no idea.
Tell me what the chart proves. This should be good since you are unable to read a graph an draw appropriate inferences.
there are some really gullible people out there. Obama has out spent just about every president in our history and its been a proven fact. Yet the liberals still want to believe what the con artist liberals are feeding to them. Plus the fact that Obama has sent millions for foreign countries to aid them. 1.2 million to the Muslim brotherhood. There is a list a mile long on what crap Obama has blown our money on. Let alone what all his vactions and family are costing us. We the struggling americans are paying billions for these politicians and that is a known fact unless you have your head in the sand.
What is the 'leftist' agenda of this web site?
I have no idea.
Tell me what the chart proves. This should be good since you are unable to read a graph an draw appropriate inferences.
Uh it means tax cuts are harmful to the economy. They do NOTHING but increase the need for spending.
