Can you believe this, the name of CIA station Chief in Afghanistan leaked by President....

[2aguy]

Yes......this man's life is in danger......we need to impeach the President because he leaked the name of the CIA station Chief operating in a terrorist/war zone hot spot........

What? It wasn't Trump? Who was it? It was Obama? Really.................and was there any outrage then? No? No outrage?

Never mind.....

White House mistakenly identifies CIA chief in Afghanistan

The CIA’s top officer in Kabul was exposed Saturday by the White House when his name was inadvertently included on a list provided to news organizations of senior U.S. officials participating in President Obama’s surprise visit with U.S. troops.

The White House recognized the mistake and quickly issued a revised list that did not include the individual, who had been identified on the initial release as the “Chief of Station” in Kabul, a designation used by the CIA for its highest-ranking spy in a country.

The disclosure marked a rare instance in which a CIA officer working overseas had his cover — the secrecy meant to protect his actual identity — pierced by his own government.

 

[task0778]

No hypocrisy here, no sir.

 

[hadit]

Yes......this man's life is in danger......we need to impeach the President because he leaked the name of the CIA station Chief operating in a terrorist/war zone hot spot........

What? It wasn't Trump? Who was it? It was Obama? Really.................and was there any outrage then? No? No outrage?

Never mind.....

White House mistakenly identifies CIA chief in Afghanistan

The CIA’s top officer in Kabul was exposed Saturday by the White House when his name was inadvertently included on a list provided to news organizations of senior U.S. officials participating in President Obama’s surprise visit with U.S. troops.

The White House recognized the mistake and quickly issued a revised list that did not include the individual, who had been identified on the initial release as the “Chief of Station” in Kabul, a designation used by the CIA for its highest-ranking spy in a country.

The disclosure marked a rare instance in which a CIA officer working overseas had his cover — the secrecy meant to protect his actual identity — pierced by his own government. The only other recent case came under significantly different circumstances, when former CIA operative Valerie Plame was exposed as officials of the George W. Bush administration sought to discredit her husband, a former ambassador and fierce critic of the decision to invade Iraq.

You weren't supposed to remember that.

 

[2aguy]

Yes......this man's life is in danger......we need to impeach the President because he leaked the name of the CIA station Chief operating in a terrorist/war zone hot spot........

What? It wasn't Trump? Who was it? It was Obama? Really.................and was there any outrage then? No? No outrage?

Never mind.....

White House mistakenly identifies CIA chief in Afghanistan

The CIA’s top officer in Kabul was exposed Saturday by the White House when his name was inadvertently included on a list provided to news organizations of senior U.S. officials participating in President Obama’s surprise visit with U.S. troops.

The White House recognized the mistake and quickly issued a revised list that did not include the individual, who had been identified on the initial release as the “Chief of Station” in Kabul, a designation used by the CIA for its highest-ranking spy in a country.

The disclosure marked a rare instance in which a CIA officer working overseas had his cover — the secrecy meant to protect his actual identity — pierced by his own government. The only other recent case came under significantly different circumstances, when former CIA operative Valerie Plame was exposed as officials of the George W. Bush administration sought to discredit her husband, a former ambassador and fierce critic of the decision to invade Iraq.

You weren't supposed to remember that.

As a matter of truth...I didn't remember it, Mike Gallagher's guest did.....and he brought it up.....this is why the left hates the internet...

 

[hadit]

Yes......this man's life is in danger......we need to impeach the President because he leaked the name of the CIA station Chief operating in a terrorist/war zone hot spot........

What? It wasn't Trump? Who was it? It was Obama? Really.................and was there any outrage then? No? No outrage?

Never mind.....

White House mistakenly identifies CIA chief in Afghanistan

The CIA’s top officer in Kabul was exposed Saturday by the White House when his name was inadvertently included on a list provided to news organizations of senior U.S. officials participating in President Obama’s surprise visit with U.S. troops.

The White House recognized the mistake and quickly issued a revised list that did not include the individual, who had been identified on the initial release as the “Chief of Station” in Kabul, a designation used by the CIA for its highest-ranking spy in a country.

The disclosure marked a rare instance in which a CIA officer working overseas had his cover — the secrecy meant to protect his actual identity — pierced by his own government. The only other recent case came under significantly different circumstances, when former CIA operative Valerie Plame was exposed as officials of the George W. Bush administration sought to discredit her husband, a former ambassador and fierce critic of the decision to invade Iraq.

You weren't supposed to remember that.

As a matter of truth...I didn't remember it, Mike Gallagher's guest did.....and he brought it up.....this is why the left hates the internet...

I really think most of these politicians do not actually believe every word they speak is recorded somewhere and, more importantly, is easily accessed.

 

[TheOldSchool]

That happened. So Trump can go ahead and give Putin our launch codes. MAGA.

 

[bodecea]

That happened. So Trump can go ahead and give Putin our launch codes. MAGA.

I know....right. According to the OP, his hero, Former President Obama did it, so......the current so-called president has his complete approval to do the same.

 

[Picaro]

Obama also promised the Soviet Ambassador he would 'give them a much better deal after his re-election', and that is recorded also. No such recording of Trump is out there, despite all the fake news claiming there is.

 

[hadit]

That happened. So Trump can go ahead and give Putin our launch codes. MAGA.

That goodness that's not going to happen. That would be scary.

 

[TheOldSchool]

That happened. So Trump can go ahead and give Putin our launch codes. MAGA.

That goodness that's not going to happen. That would be scary.

It already may have.

 

[hadit]

That happened. So Trump can go ahead and give Putin our launch codes. MAGA.

That goodness that's not going to happen. That would be scary.

It already may have.

"May have". Not a lot to hang a hat on, but keep the faith.

Obama "may have" given ISIS the names of all our sources in their regions.

Hillary "may have" deliberately sold access and influence for "contributions" to her "foundation".

This is fun. You go next.

 

[TheOldSchool]

That happened. So Trump can go ahead and give Putin our launch codes. MAGA.

That goodness that's not going to happen. That would be scary.

It already may have.

"May have". Not a lot to hang a hat on, but keep the faith.

Obama "may have" given ISIS the names of all our sources in their regions.

Hillary "may have" deliberately sold access and influence for "contributions" to her "foundation".

This is fun. You go next.

Trump "did" give classified information, in exchange for nothing, to a government that is still occupying the land of one of our allies and that worked to sabotage our election.

 

[August West]

No hypocrisy here, no sir.

No deflection either? Every other day the orange man has a major scandal and they run to Obama and Hillary for cover. Too little too late. In a year or so he`ll be gone.

 

[hadit]

That happened. So Trump can go ahead and give Putin our launch codes. MAGA.

That goodness that's not going to happen. That would be scary.

It already may have.

"May have". Not a lot to hang a hat on, but keep the faith.

Obama "may have" given ISIS the names of all our sources in their regions.

Hillary "may have" deliberately sold access and influence for "contributions" to her "foundation".

This is fun. You go next.

Trump "did" give classified information, in exchange for nothing, to a government that is still occupying the land of one of our allies and that worked to sabotage our election.

We have an eyewitness who has gone on public record and is willing to be identified, who says nothing wrong happened. OTOH, we have "anonymous sources" who are NOT willing to be identified, who say what you say. Of course, the ONLY conclusion in this case is to wildly leap to total belief in the "anonymous sources".

But you're lying down on the job. What else "may have" happened?

 

[Picaro]

No hypocrisy here, no sir.

No deflection either? Every other day the orange man has a major scandal and they run to Obama and Hillary for cover. Too little too late. In a year or so he`ll be gone.

Imaginary 'scandals' made up by by left wing PR hacks don't count as 'major scandals'; in fact you tards have yet to make even one stick. You're truly delusional and insane; most deviants are.

 

[TheOldSchool]

That happened. So Trump can go ahead and give Putin our launch codes. MAGA.

That goodness that's not going to happen. That would be scary.

It already may have.

"May have". Not a lot to hang a hat on, but keep the faith.

Obama "may have" given ISIS the names of all our sources in their regions.

Hillary "may have" deliberately sold access and influence for "contributions" to her "foundation".

This is fun. You go next.

Trump "did" give classified information, in exchange for nothing, to a government that is still occupying the land of one of our allies and that worked to sabotage our election.

We have an eyewitness who has gone on public record and is willing to be identified, who says nothing wrong happened. OTOH, we have "anonymous sources" who are NOT willing to be identified, who say what you say. Of course, the ONLY conclusion in this case is to wildly leap to total belief in the "anonymous sources".

But you're lying down on the job. What else "may have" happened?

Yeah the people who gave our enemy classified information in exchange for nothing said it was okay.

Good fucking grief. And they don't even pay you. :

 

[August West]

No hypocrisy here, no sir.

No deflection either? Every other day the orange man has a major scandal and they run to Obama and Hillary for cover. Too little too late. In a year or so he`ll be gone.

Imaginary 'scandals' made up by by left wing PR hacks don't count as 'major scandals'; in fact you tards have yet to make even one stick. You're truly delusional and insane; most deviants are.

17 Intelligence agencies are left wing PR hacks? It`s hard to make one scandal stick when they`re coming 2 or 3 times a week. The show is just starting. You were 0 for 8 years with Obama

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

That happened. So Trump can go ahead and give Putin our launch codes. MAGA.

That goodness that's not going to happen. That would be scary.

It already may have.

According to who you lying little faggot?

 

[TheOldSchool]

That happened. So Trump can go ahead and give Putin our launch codes. MAGA.

That goodness that's not going to happen. That would be scary.

It already may have.

According to who you lying little faggot?

Aww you poor thing

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

That happened. So Trump can go ahead and give Putin our launch codes. MAGA.

That goodness that's not going to happen. That would be scary.

It already may have.

According to who you lying little faggot?

Aww you poor thing

Just keep spouting your fake news bitch, nobody is listening to you people anymore.