MaggieMae
Reality bits
- Apr 3, 2009
- 24,043
- 1,635
- 48
He's the lead defense attorney. What's not to get? If he had put a question to Lee Anthony about sexual indiscretions toward Casey now, it would not have been allowed at this point in time UNLESS the prosecutor had brought the issue into his line of questioning. And of course he wouldn't do that.
I said it was the right answer, I get it.
If he tried, the prosecution would object and it would be sustained. Those are exactly the games JB plays. Trying to plant the idea in the jury's heads the prosecution wants to hide something.
You know where I stand, so you must know I think JB is taking the jury for fools with his defense.
Frankly, in such a high-profile murder case, as a criminal defense attorney, I don't think he's going far enough to "plant" ideas in the minds of the jury. It's what they do. I'm surprised there haven't been more opportunities calling for the judge instructing the jury to "disregard what was just said." Yeah, like they really will.
Look at it this way: If I were innocent, I would want my attorney to pull out all stops. If I were a victim, I would want the prosecution to do the same.