TheProgressivePatriot
Gold Member
- Jun 11, 2015
- 27,380
- 7,884
Get help!Says the person who actually believes the Democrat propaganda! LOL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Get help!Says the person who actually believes the Democrat propaganda! LOL
Johnson's wife is offering the help that you and your liberal friends need.Get help!
It’s just marriage.Marriage, by definition, always has been, and always will be, between a man and a woman. To claim that a disgusting homosexual mockery of “marriage” is in any way comparable to a genuine marriage does not make it so, and accomplishes nothing other than to demonstrate what a morally-, spiritually-, and intellectually-fucked-up degenerate the creature is that is making that claim.
…and accomplishes nothing other than to demonstrate what a morally-, spiritually-, and intellectually-fucked-up degenerate the creature is that is making that claim.
It’s just marriage.
No different than any other marriage.
For the hateful, bigoted right it’s about fear and ignorance; gay and transgender Americans aren’t a ‘threat’ to anyone; same-sex marriage isn’t a ‘threat’ to anyone.
The only threat are conservatives’ lies and efforts to vilify those gay and transgender and to divide the American people with those lies.
Among the many problems with the electoral system is Republicans lying – this post being one of countless examples.The main problem in the electoral system is the Democrats cheating. If that wasn't happening things would be a lot different. Oh also Democrats lying and hoaxing.
Why? You're the person with something wrong with them.Get help!
Schoolteacher selling pornographic content....that is sexual anarchy.And this has what exactly to do with the topic?
Dude! The topic is Johnsons statement that --" that homosexuality will lead to 'chaos and sexual anarchy'---"Schoolteacher selling pornographic content....that is sexual anarchy.
I was in school in the 1960s-1970s and they never had to quit over pregnancy.Schoolteacher selling pornographic content....that is sexual anarchy.
Because once upon a time a schoolteacher so much as getting pregnant outside of the bounds of marriage would be fired...even inside she often had to quit for a while instead of being pregnant in front of the children.
But now I stead of being morally a leader we have the top rated slutty milf teaching school children.
Let's get rid of marriage altogether. Make it simply a contract between 2 people. And if both agree to break it at some point then so be it. Issue fixed. More and more people will just start living together and skip the process anyway. It's on the way out. Good riddens. One less thing to argue about.
I don't like religion because none of you actually seem content to leave the judging to God.
I don't pretend to be a Christian you moron, nor do I pretend that my opinion is the opinion of Sky Daddy's.As if you don't 'judge', please.
I don't pretend to be a Christian you moron, nor do I pretend that my opinion is the opinion of Sky Daddy's.
Everyone's allowed to judge, I don't hide my judgements behind sky daddy, nor do I pretend to subscribe to a faith that tells me only sky daddy can judge. What are you confused about you Bingo?Oh, so you're allowed to judge if you're not a Christian? Tell me more, how does your judgment differ exactly?
Everyone's allowed to judge, I don't hide my judgements behind sky daddy, nor do I pretend to subscribe to a faith that tells me only sky daddy can judge. What are you confused about you Bingo?
Which part? The part about your judgements being your own rather than God's? Well that's just rational thinking on my part. Your thoughts don't come from sky daddy or magical fairy dust, they come from brain activity in your own head.And what are you basing your judgement on, your own feelings and emotions?
Not at all. I think your feelings are equally as valid as mine. All opinions are equally subjective. What I don't subscribe to is the notion that your opinion means more than mine just because you claim sky daddy agrees with you. Obviously my opinion matters more because Zeus agrees with me and he says he can kick sky daddy's ass.It's a complete bullshit argument that your side has used for decades, that judgement is allowed as long as it is not rooted in 'religion'. What you're basically saying is that if you have a belief or faith in something than yourself that your emotions and feeling then have no merit at all.
Guess what you Bingo, that's what we're all doing. You included.While you sit there and cast judgement on everyone from some imaginary form of morality that you've decided is right in your own mind?
Because the people of the past didn't conjure their beliefs out of thin air? Prove it.Why are your thoughts more accurate, because you have no faith in anything beyond yourself? If so, that's your opinion, and you're welcome to it, but it doesn't give you the right to discredit where others form their moral values from. Your conclusions of what is moral and right is no different, there is no difference at all. As a matter of fact, using history and a faith as a moral compass far surpasses one that you just conjure up out of thin air.
Which part? The part about your judgements being your own rather than God's? Well that's just rational thinking on my part. Your thoughts don't come from sky daddy or magical fairy dust, they come from brain activity in your own head.
The part about only God being the judge that I learned from Christians and the Bible. Am I wrong?
Not at all. I think your feelings are equally as valid as mine. All opinions are equally subjective. What I don't subscribe to is the notion that your opinion means more than mine just because you claim sky daddy agrees with you. Obviously my opinion matters more because Zeus agrees with me and he says he can kick sky daddy's ass.
Guess what you Bingo, that's what we're all doing. You included.
Because the people of the past didn't conjure their beliefs out of thin air? Prove it.
Objective observation..... science.... I'm not sure how to explain to you the difference between things that can be reasoned with observation from the things expected to be taken on faith if as an adult you don't understand the difference.Who determines that your thoughts are 'rational'?
What's your point?You can't argue my point, therefore you make things up to argue.
That doesn't really address my point which is that according to the Bible Christians aren't supposed to judge and that the ones who do are pretending their judgement is God's judgment.But you did finally grasp one thing, 'Guess what you Bingo, that's what we're all doing. You included.'
That's exactly what I am saying, your judgment is no different, maybe you're finally learning, but I doubt it.